当领导力受到攻击:从最糟糕的老板那里幸存下来的故事

IF 0.5 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Lonnie R. Morris, Cynthia M. Sims, Wendy M. Edmonds
{"title":"当领导力受到攻击:从最糟糕的老板那里幸存下来的故事","authors":"Lonnie R. Morris,&nbsp;Cynthia M. Sims,&nbsp;Wendy M. Edmonds","doi":"10.1002/jls.21835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Inspired by the stories of negative leadership encounters curated in <i>When Leadership Fails</i> (Morris &amp; Edmonds, <span>2021</span>), the current symposium continues the plight to identify, deconstruct, and process leadership at its worst. Leadership from the worst bosses can span the gamut from mere ineffectiveness to extreme unconscionable behavior (Normore &amp; Brooks, <span>2016</span>). It often emanates from self-centered personality traits that trigger indifference, arrogance, intemperance, envy, and greed (Walker &amp; Kutsyuruba, <span>2016</span>). It can include bullying, humiliation, manipulation, deception, and harassment. At times it is abusive in the form of ongoing verbal and nonverbal hostility (Tepper, <span>2000</span>). It may present as unethical leadership when bosses act without a moral compass (Aboyassin &amp; Abood, <span>2013</span>). It can even involve organizational sabotage in the form of absenteeism, deception, or stealing (Einarsen, Aasland, &amp; Skogstad, <span>2007</span>).</p><p>We understand experiences with poor leadership and bad bosses significantly impact individual and organizational outcomes (Aboyassin &amp; Abood, <span>2013</span>). The damage can be long-standing, affecting victims and witnesses even if they move onto new supervisors, departments, or organizations. Bosses and their bad leadership can incite anxiety that increases perceived exposure to negative leadership behaviors going forward and how employees respond to such behavior (Tepper, <span>2000</span>). Employees who endure these experiences are more likely to interpret unfavorable actions as abusive, even if they are not. They may also be more prone to respond negatively to critical actions and decisions.</p><p>The symposium serves as a direct response to calls from Johnson (<span>2018</span>) for leaders to combat evil by stepping out of the shadows, Edmonds (<span>2021</span>) for addressing the dark side of the leadership spectrum and associated consequences, and Klenke (<span>2008</span>) for qualitative documentation of leadership experiences that shape communities, organizations, and nations. In the spirit of Sims &amp; Hughes (<span>2018</span>), we seek to meet the needs of the modern workforce by empowering employees and reimaging approaches to leadership. These stories of surviving bad bosses were deconstructed in the same vein previous works (Carmeli &amp; Sheaffer, <span>2008</span>; Kellerman, <span>2004</span>; Normore &amp; Brooks, <span>2016</span>) unpacked leader failure and bad boss behavior—to promote learning, employee healing, and leader development.</p><p>In the symposium, Dr. Sharon Lassiter reflects on lessons learned from surviving bad bosses in educational leadership. She recounts professional struggles with two different supervisors at opposite ends of the charisma spectrum. She examines how leader ineffectiveness, lack of vision, poor communication, and micromanagement (among other things) provided critical experiences that taught her the value of power and necessity of coping mechanisms. Dr. David Sippio tackles the underpinnings of workplace bullying. He explores the roots of toxic, bullying leadership behavior in the tyrannical, destructive philosophy of American slavery. He integrates reflections on his personal encounters with these bad bosses with critical analysis of how these ideas evolved in leadership theory. Through it all, he offers strategies to combat the personal anxiety and bewilderment that can result from exposure to these leadership practices. Through case study analysis, Dr. Comfort Okpala explores abusive leadership in the context of an unstable organization. High employee turnover was the result of ineffective managers and lack of accountability. Incompetence, self-centered, micromanagement, and intimidation emerged as themes to describe how participants experienced abusive supervision. Forming alliances and being authentic emerged to describe strategies used to navigate the abusive work environment. Dr. Heidi Marshall grapples with the effects of toxic masculinity on women in the workplace. She dissects poor leadership fueled by harmful motives and the aftermath. In processing her own psychological distress, she identifies the lasting impact of these experiences. With experiences that run the gamut of struggling to articulate what happened to disengaging with the work environment, she unravels the damage caused by bad bosses.</p><p>We owe the utmost gratitude to our contributing authors. Thank you for sharing these experiences. Thank you for trusting us to relay them to the leadership community in this way. We value your time, scholarship, and reflection.</p>","PeriodicalId":45503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Leadership Studies","volume":"16 4","pages":"22-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jls.21835","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Leadership Attacks: Stories of Surviving the Worst Bosses\",\"authors\":\"Lonnie R. Morris,&nbsp;Cynthia M. Sims,&nbsp;Wendy M. Edmonds\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jls.21835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Inspired by the stories of negative leadership encounters curated in <i>When Leadership Fails</i> (Morris &amp; Edmonds, <span>2021</span>), the current symposium continues the plight to identify, deconstruct, and process leadership at its worst. Leadership from the worst bosses can span the gamut from mere ineffectiveness to extreme unconscionable behavior (Normore &amp; Brooks, <span>2016</span>). It often emanates from self-centered personality traits that trigger indifference, arrogance, intemperance, envy, and greed (Walker &amp; Kutsyuruba, <span>2016</span>). It can include bullying, humiliation, manipulation, deception, and harassment. At times it is abusive in the form of ongoing verbal and nonverbal hostility (Tepper, <span>2000</span>). It may present as unethical leadership when bosses act without a moral compass (Aboyassin &amp; Abood, <span>2013</span>). It can even involve organizational sabotage in the form of absenteeism, deception, or stealing (Einarsen, Aasland, &amp; Skogstad, <span>2007</span>).</p><p>We understand experiences with poor leadership and bad bosses significantly impact individual and organizational outcomes (Aboyassin &amp; Abood, <span>2013</span>). The damage can be long-standing, affecting victims and witnesses even if they move onto new supervisors, departments, or organizations. Bosses and their bad leadership can incite anxiety that increases perceived exposure to negative leadership behaviors going forward and how employees respond to such behavior (Tepper, <span>2000</span>). Employees who endure these experiences are more likely to interpret unfavorable actions as abusive, even if they are not. They may also be more prone to respond negatively to critical actions and decisions.</p><p>The symposium serves as a direct response to calls from Johnson (<span>2018</span>) for leaders to combat evil by stepping out of the shadows, Edmonds (<span>2021</span>) for addressing the dark side of the leadership spectrum and associated consequences, and Klenke (<span>2008</span>) for qualitative documentation of leadership experiences that shape communities, organizations, and nations. In the spirit of Sims &amp; Hughes (<span>2018</span>), we seek to meet the needs of the modern workforce by empowering employees and reimaging approaches to leadership. These stories of surviving bad bosses were deconstructed in the same vein previous works (Carmeli &amp; Sheaffer, <span>2008</span>; Kellerman, <span>2004</span>; Normore &amp; Brooks, <span>2016</span>) unpacked leader failure and bad boss behavior—to promote learning, employee healing, and leader development.</p><p>In the symposium, Dr. Sharon Lassiter reflects on lessons learned from surviving bad bosses in educational leadership. She recounts professional struggles with two different supervisors at opposite ends of the charisma spectrum. She examines how leader ineffectiveness, lack of vision, poor communication, and micromanagement (among other things) provided critical experiences that taught her the value of power and necessity of coping mechanisms. Dr. David Sippio tackles the underpinnings of workplace bullying. He explores the roots of toxic, bullying leadership behavior in the tyrannical, destructive philosophy of American slavery. He integrates reflections on his personal encounters with these bad bosses with critical analysis of how these ideas evolved in leadership theory. Through it all, he offers strategies to combat the personal anxiety and bewilderment that can result from exposure to these leadership practices. Through case study analysis, Dr. Comfort Okpala explores abusive leadership in the context of an unstable organization. High employee turnover was the result of ineffective managers and lack of accountability. Incompetence, self-centered, micromanagement, and intimidation emerged as themes to describe how participants experienced abusive supervision. Forming alliances and being authentic emerged to describe strategies used to navigate the abusive work environment. Dr. Heidi Marshall grapples with the effects of toxic masculinity on women in the workplace. She dissects poor leadership fueled by harmful motives and the aftermath. In processing her own psychological distress, she identifies the lasting impact of these experiences. With experiences that run the gamut of struggling to articulate what happened to disengaging with the work environment, she unravels the damage caused by bad bosses.</p><p>We owe the utmost gratitude to our contributing authors. Thank you for sharing these experiences. Thank you for trusting us to relay them to the leadership community in this way. We value your time, scholarship, and reflection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Leadership Studies\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"22-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jls.21835\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Leadership Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jls.21835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Leadership Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jls.21835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

灵感来自于《当领导力失败时》(Morris &Edmonds, 2021),当前的研讨会继续在最坏的情况下识别,解构和处理领导的困境。最糟糕的老板的领导可以从纯粹的无能到极端的不合理行为(诺莫尔& &;布鲁克斯,2016)。它通常源于以自我为中心的性格特征,这些性格特征会引发冷漠、傲慢、放纵、嫉妒和贪婪。Kutsyuruba, 2016)。它可以包括欺凌、羞辱、操纵、欺骗和骚扰。有时,它以持续的言语和非言语敌意的形式出现(泰珀,2000)。当老板的行为没有道德指南针时,可能会表现为不道德的领导(Aboyassin & &;Abood, 2013)。它甚至包括以旷工、欺骗或偷窃等形式的组织破坏(Einarsen, Aasland, &Skogstad, 2007)。我们知道,糟糕的领导和糟糕的老板会对个人和组织的成果产生重大影响(Aboyassin & &;Abood, 2013)。这种伤害可能是长期的,即使受害者和证人换到新的主管、部门或组织,也会受到影响。老板和他们的坏领导可以激发焦虑,增加对消极领导行为的感知暴露,以及员工如何应对这种行为(泰珀,2000)。忍受这些经历的员工更有可能将不利的行为解释为虐待,即使他们不是。他们也可能更倾向于对关键的行为和决定做出消极的反应。本次研讨会是对Johnson(2018)呼吁领导人走出阴影来对抗邪恶的直接回应,Edmonds(2021)呼吁解决领导光谱的阴暗面及其相关后果,Klenke(2008)呼吁定性记录塑造社区、组织和国家的领导经验。本着《模拟人生》的精神Hughes(2018),我们寻求通过赋予员工权力和重新构想领导方法来满足现代劳动力的需求。这些幸存下来的坏老板的故事被解构成与之前作品相同的风格(Carmeli &;犀飞利,2008;凯勒曼,2004;Normore,布鲁克斯,2016)解开领导失败和坏老板行为——促进学习,员工愈合和领导者发展。在研讨会上,莎伦·拉斯特博士反思了从教育领导中幸存下来的坏老板身上学到的教训。她讲述了在个人魅力谱的两端,她与两个不同的主管之间的职业斗争。她研究了领导者的低效、缺乏远见、沟通不灵和微观管理(以及其他一些事情)如何提供了重要的经验,这些经验教会了她权力的价值和应对机制的必要性。大卫·西皮奥博士探讨了职场欺凌的根源。他在美国奴隶制的暴虐、破坏性哲学中探索了有毒、欺凌的领导行为的根源。他将自己与这些坏老板的个人经历的反思与对这些想法在领导理论中如何演变的批判性分析结合起来。在整个过程中,他提供了一些策略,以对抗因接触这些领导实践而可能产生的个人焦虑和困惑。康福特·奥克帕拉博士通过案例分析,探讨了不稳定组织背景下的滥用领导。员工流动率高是管理人员效率低下和缺乏问责制的结果。无能、自我中心、微观管理和恐吓成为描述参与者如何经历虐待监督的主题。建立联盟和保持真诚是应对恶劣工作环境的策略。海蒂·马歇尔(Heidi Marshall)博士致力于研究有毒的男性气质对职场女性的影响。她剖析了由有害动机推动的糟糕领导及其后果。在处理自己的心理困扰时,她发现了这些经历的持久影响。她的经历让她难以清楚地表达出脱离工作环境的后果,她解释了坏老板造成的伤害。我们非常感谢我们的投稿作者。谢谢你分享这些经历。感谢您信任我们以这种方式将它们传递给领导社区。我们重视你的时间、学识和反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Leadership Attacks: Stories of Surviving the Worst Bosses

Inspired by the stories of negative leadership encounters curated in When Leadership Fails (Morris & Edmonds, 2021), the current symposium continues the plight to identify, deconstruct, and process leadership at its worst. Leadership from the worst bosses can span the gamut from mere ineffectiveness to extreme unconscionable behavior (Normore & Brooks, 2016). It often emanates from self-centered personality traits that trigger indifference, arrogance, intemperance, envy, and greed (Walker & Kutsyuruba, 2016). It can include bullying, humiliation, manipulation, deception, and harassment. At times it is abusive in the form of ongoing verbal and nonverbal hostility (Tepper, 2000). It may present as unethical leadership when bosses act without a moral compass (Aboyassin & Abood, 2013). It can even involve organizational sabotage in the form of absenteeism, deception, or stealing (Einarsen, Aasland, & Skogstad, 2007).

We understand experiences with poor leadership and bad bosses significantly impact individual and organizational outcomes (Aboyassin & Abood, 2013). The damage can be long-standing, affecting victims and witnesses even if they move onto new supervisors, departments, or organizations. Bosses and their bad leadership can incite anxiety that increases perceived exposure to negative leadership behaviors going forward and how employees respond to such behavior (Tepper, 2000). Employees who endure these experiences are more likely to interpret unfavorable actions as abusive, even if they are not. They may also be more prone to respond negatively to critical actions and decisions.

The symposium serves as a direct response to calls from Johnson (2018) for leaders to combat evil by stepping out of the shadows, Edmonds (2021) for addressing the dark side of the leadership spectrum and associated consequences, and Klenke (2008) for qualitative documentation of leadership experiences that shape communities, organizations, and nations. In the spirit of Sims & Hughes (2018), we seek to meet the needs of the modern workforce by empowering employees and reimaging approaches to leadership. These stories of surviving bad bosses were deconstructed in the same vein previous works (Carmeli & Sheaffer, 2008; Kellerman, 2004; Normore & Brooks, 2016) unpacked leader failure and bad boss behavior—to promote learning, employee healing, and leader development.

In the symposium, Dr. Sharon Lassiter reflects on lessons learned from surviving bad bosses in educational leadership. She recounts professional struggles with two different supervisors at opposite ends of the charisma spectrum. She examines how leader ineffectiveness, lack of vision, poor communication, and micromanagement (among other things) provided critical experiences that taught her the value of power and necessity of coping mechanisms. Dr. David Sippio tackles the underpinnings of workplace bullying. He explores the roots of toxic, bullying leadership behavior in the tyrannical, destructive philosophy of American slavery. He integrates reflections on his personal encounters with these bad bosses with critical analysis of how these ideas evolved in leadership theory. Through it all, he offers strategies to combat the personal anxiety and bewilderment that can result from exposure to these leadership practices. Through case study analysis, Dr. Comfort Okpala explores abusive leadership in the context of an unstable organization. High employee turnover was the result of ineffective managers and lack of accountability. Incompetence, self-centered, micromanagement, and intimidation emerged as themes to describe how participants experienced abusive supervision. Forming alliances and being authentic emerged to describe strategies used to navigate the abusive work environment. Dr. Heidi Marshall grapples with the effects of toxic masculinity on women in the workplace. She dissects poor leadership fueled by harmful motives and the aftermath. In processing her own psychological distress, she identifies the lasting impact of these experiences. With experiences that run the gamut of struggling to articulate what happened to disengaging with the work environment, she unravels the damage caused by bad bosses.

We owe the utmost gratitude to our contributing authors. Thank you for sharing these experiences. Thank you for trusting us to relay them to the leadership community in this way. We value your time, scholarship, and reflection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信