主导逻辑——认知和实践层面及其与战略更新和绩效的关系

IF 7.5 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Ari Jantunen, Anni Tuppura, Satu Pätäri
{"title":"主导逻辑——认知和实践层面及其与战略更新和绩效的关系","authors":"Ari Jantunen,&nbsp;Anni Tuppura,&nbsp;Satu Pätäri","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2022.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we distinguish two facets of dominant logic and assess empirically their relationships to strategic renewal and firm performance. In a sample of 156 Finnish small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the forestry and forest products sector, we find that cognitive and practiced dominant logics have divergent relationships with outcomes. Practiced dominant logic is more strongly related to a recognized need for capability development and performance than cognitive dominant logic is. These effects appear regardless of whether the practiced dominant logic is efficiency- or proactivity-oriented. Further, the results suggest that the differences in practiced dominant logic may reflect future investment plans, especially in terms of investment in research and development and new markets. We contribute to the literature by examining with survey-based data the relationship that dominant logic has with strategic renewal and performance. The practiced and cognitive dominant logics are measured separately, and we present a novel operationalization of cognitive dominant logic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322000913/pdfft?md5=bca7e202beb265dc84502aa158af6aee&pid=1-s2.0-S0263237322000913-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dominant logic – Cognitive and practiced facets and their relationships to strategic renewal and performance\",\"authors\":\"Ari Jantunen,&nbsp;Anni Tuppura,&nbsp;Satu Pätäri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.emj.2022.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, we distinguish two facets of dominant logic and assess empirically their relationships to strategic renewal and firm performance. In a sample of 156 Finnish small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the forestry and forest products sector, we find that cognitive and practiced dominant logics have divergent relationships with outcomes. Practiced dominant logic is more strongly related to a recognized need for capability development and performance than cognitive dominant logic is. These effects appear regardless of whether the practiced dominant logic is efficiency- or proactivity-oriented. Further, the results suggest that the differences in practiced dominant logic may reflect future investment plans, especially in terms of investment in research and development and new markets. We contribute to the literature by examining with survey-based data the relationship that dominant logic has with strategic renewal and performance. The practiced and cognitive dominant logics are measured separately, and we present a novel operationalization of cognitive dominant logic.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Management Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322000913/pdfft?md5=bca7e202beb265dc84502aa158af6aee&pid=1-s2.0-S0263237322000913-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322000913\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322000913","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们区分了主导逻辑的两个方面,并对它们与战略更新和企业绩效之间的关系进行了实证评估。我们以芬兰林业和林产品行业的 156 家中小型企业为样本,发现认知主导逻辑和实践主导逻辑与结果之间存在不同的关系。与认知主导逻辑相比,实践主导逻辑与公认的能力发展需求和绩效的关系更为密切。无论实践主导逻辑是以效率为导向还是以主动性为导向,这些效应都会出现。此外,研究结果表明,实践主导逻辑的差异可能反映了未来的投资计划,尤其是在研发投资和新市场方面。我们通过基于调查的数据,研究了主导逻辑与战略更新和绩效之间的关系,为相关文献做出了贡献。我们分别测量了实践主导逻辑和认知主导逻辑,并提出了认知主导逻辑的新操作方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dominant logic – Cognitive and practiced facets and their relationships to strategic renewal and performance

In this study, we distinguish two facets of dominant logic and assess empirically their relationships to strategic renewal and firm performance. In a sample of 156 Finnish small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the forestry and forest products sector, we find that cognitive and practiced dominant logics have divergent relationships with outcomes. Practiced dominant logic is more strongly related to a recognized need for capability development and performance than cognitive dominant logic is. These effects appear regardless of whether the practiced dominant logic is efficiency- or proactivity-oriented. Further, the results suggest that the differences in practiced dominant logic may reflect future investment plans, especially in terms of investment in research and development and new markets. We contribute to the literature by examining with survey-based data the relationship that dominant logic has with strategic renewal and performance. The practiced and cognitive dominant logics are measured separately, and we present a novel operationalization of cognitive dominant logic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信