意大利禽肉生产链中的抗生素耐药性:从一个健康角度比较从养殖到屠宰场的无抗生素和传统系统

G. Ferri, A. Buonavoglia, M. Farooq, A. R. Festino, Fausto Ruffini, D. Paludi, C. D. Di Francesco, A. Vergara, C. Smoglica
{"title":"意大利禽肉生产链中的抗生素耐药性:从一个健康角度比较从养殖到屠宰场的无抗生素和传统系统","authors":"G. Ferri, A. Buonavoglia, M. Farooq, A. R. Festino, Fausto Ruffini, D. Paludi, C. D. Di Francesco, A. Vergara, C. Smoglica","doi":"10.3389/frfst.2023.1168896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study a multidisciplinary approach was applied in order to determine the diffusion of resistant bacteria and selected antibiotic resistance genes in antibiotic-free and conventional broiler farms. Litter samples coming from the two farming types and surface sponges obtained from carcasses at slaughterhouse level were screened by end-point PCR targeting specific resistance for tetracycline, ampicillin, sulfonamide, aminoglycoside, carbapenem, nitrofurantoin, vancomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, lincomycin, linezolid, chloramphenicol molecules. Microbiological investigations were conducted from the carcasses to determine phenotypical and genetic resistance patterns from pathogenic and commensal Gram-negative and Gram-positive strains. At farm level, catA1, sul2, blaTEM and aadA2 genes were amplified in all samples, while from carcasses the most representative genes were sul2, blaTEM, along with the vatD, relative to quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance. Gram-negative isolates included Aeromonas, Salmonella, Proteus spp. And Escherichia coli, while the Gram-positive were represented by Enterococcus strains. Phenotypical and genetic analysis revealed multidrug resistance patterns in Salmonella, E. coli and Serratia isolates, followed by the Enterococcus species. The comparison between antibiotic-free and conventional farming systems showed some difference regarding the distribution of resistance genes at farm level but no significance was obtained comparing the phenotypical resistance profiles of bacterial strains from both groups of samples, suggesting a poor influence of farming model on the diffusion of antibiotic resistance in poultry meat production chain.","PeriodicalId":93753,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in food science and technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic resistance in Italian poultry meat production chain: a one-health perspective comparing antibiotic free and conventional systems from the farming to the slaughterhouse\",\"authors\":\"G. Ferri, A. Buonavoglia, M. Farooq, A. R. Festino, Fausto Ruffini, D. Paludi, C. D. Di Francesco, A. Vergara, C. Smoglica\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frfst.2023.1168896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study a multidisciplinary approach was applied in order to determine the diffusion of resistant bacteria and selected antibiotic resistance genes in antibiotic-free and conventional broiler farms. Litter samples coming from the two farming types and surface sponges obtained from carcasses at slaughterhouse level were screened by end-point PCR targeting specific resistance for tetracycline, ampicillin, sulfonamide, aminoglycoside, carbapenem, nitrofurantoin, vancomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, lincomycin, linezolid, chloramphenicol molecules. Microbiological investigations were conducted from the carcasses to determine phenotypical and genetic resistance patterns from pathogenic and commensal Gram-negative and Gram-positive strains. At farm level, catA1, sul2, blaTEM and aadA2 genes were amplified in all samples, while from carcasses the most representative genes were sul2, blaTEM, along with the vatD, relative to quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance. Gram-negative isolates included Aeromonas, Salmonella, Proteus spp. And Escherichia coli, while the Gram-positive were represented by Enterococcus strains. Phenotypical and genetic analysis revealed multidrug resistance patterns in Salmonella, E. coli and Serratia isolates, followed by the Enterococcus species. The comparison between antibiotic-free and conventional farming systems showed some difference regarding the distribution of resistance genes at farm level but no significance was obtained comparing the phenotypical resistance profiles of bacterial strains from both groups of samples, suggesting a poor influence of farming model on the diffusion of antibiotic resistance in poultry meat production chain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in food science and technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in food science and technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frfst.2023.1168896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in food science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frfst.2023.1168896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这项研究中,应用了一种多学科的方法来确定抗性细菌和选定的抗生素抗性基因在无抗生素和传统肉鸡养殖场的扩散。通过终点PCR筛选来自两种养殖类型的粪便样本和从屠宰场水平的胴体中获得的表面海绵,靶向对四环素、氨苄青霉素、磺酰胺、氨基糖苷、碳青霉烯、呋喃妥因、万古霉素、喹唑菌素、林可霉素、利奈唑胺和氯霉素分子的特异性耐药性。对尸体进行微生物学调查,以确定致病性和共生性革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性菌株的表型和遗传抗性模式。在农场水平上,所有样品中都扩增了catA1、sul2、blaTEM和aadA2基因,而从胴体中,最具代表性的基因是sul2、blaTEM和vatD,与喹唑菌素抗性有关。革兰氏阴性菌株包括气单胞菌、沙门氏菌、变形杆菌和大肠杆菌,而革兰氏阳性菌株以肠球菌为代表。表型和遗传分析揭示了沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌和沙雷氏菌分离株的多药耐药性模式,其次是肠球菌。无抗生素和传统农业系统之间的比较显示了在农场水平上抗性基因的分布方面的一些差异,但比较来自两组样品的菌株的表型抗性谱没有获得显著性,表明养殖模式对禽肉生产链中抗生素耐药性的扩散影响不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antibiotic resistance in Italian poultry meat production chain: a one-health perspective comparing antibiotic free and conventional systems from the farming to the slaughterhouse
In this study a multidisciplinary approach was applied in order to determine the diffusion of resistant bacteria and selected antibiotic resistance genes in antibiotic-free and conventional broiler farms. Litter samples coming from the two farming types and surface sponges obtained from carcasses at slaughterhouse level were screened by end-point PCR targeting specific resistance for tetracycline, ampicillin, sulfonamide, aminoglycoside, carbapenem, nitrofurantoin, vancomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, lincomycin, linezolid, chloramphenicol molecules. Microbiological investigations were conducted from the carcasses to determine phenotypical and genetic resistance patterns from pathogenic and commensal Gram-negative and Gram-positive strains. At farm level, catA1, sul2, blaTEM and aadA2 genes were amplified in all samples, while from carcasses the most representative genes were sul2, blaTEM, along with the vatD, relative to quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance. Gram-negative isolates included Aeromonas, Salmonella, Proteus spp. And Escherichia coli, while the Gram-positive were represented by Enterococcus strains. Phenotypical and genetic analysis revealed multidrug resistance patterns in Salmonella, E. coli and Serratia isolates, followed by the Enterococcus species. The comparison between antibiotic-free and conventional farming systems showed some difference regarding the distribution of resistance genes at farm level but no significance was obtained comparing the phenotypical resistance profiles of bacterial strains from both groups of samples, suggesting a poor influence of farming model on the diffusion of antibiotic resistance in poultry meat production chain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信