基于专家判断的教师数字能力框架评估——专家能力系数的应用

IF 4.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Julio Cabero-Almenara, Rosalía Romero-Tena, Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez
{"title":"基于专家判断的教师数字能力框架评估——专家能力系数的应用","authors":"Julio Cabero-Almenara, Rosalía Romero-Tena, Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez","doi":"10.7821/naer.2020.7.578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, different proposals made by national and international organizations and institutions on Teacher Digital Literacy are taken into account. The 7 most commonly used competence frameworks in international contexts are presented for evaluation through expert judgment. Next, the most suitable for the subsequent realization of a t-MOOC on Teacher Digital Literacy was selected. The selection of these experts was based on seven criteria that helped to establish the expert knowledge coefficient (EKC). This strategy served to obtain the viability of the selected sample. A total of 412 people, 155 experts and 257 non-experts participated in this study. After conducting the expert judgment, in a single round, it was concluded that the European Framework of Digital Competence for Teachers DigCompEdu is the most valued and adequate to be used as reference for the formative t-MOOC, followed by INTEF. This result is logical, since the latter is inspired by the former. These findings do not question the validity of the other competency frameworks, but the preferences granted by the judges.","PeriodicalId":51833,"journal":{"name":"Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"275-293"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Teacher Digital Competence Frameworks Through Expert Judgement: the Use of the Expert Competence Coefficient\",\"authors\":\"Julio Cabero-Almenara, Rosalía Romero-Tena, Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.7821/naer.2020.7.578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, different proposals made by national and international organizations and institutions on Teacher Digital Literacy are taken into account. The 7 most commonly used competence frameworks in international contexts are presented for evaluation through expert judgment. Next, the most suitable for the subsequent realization of a t-MOOC on Teacher Digital Literacy was selected. The selection of these experts was based on seven criteria that helped to establish the expert knowledge coefficient (EKC). This strategy served to obtain the viability of the selected sample. A total of 412 people, 155 experts and 257 non-experts participated in this study. After conducting the expert judgment, in a single round, it was concluded that the European Framework of Digital Competence for Teachers DigCompEdu is the most valued and adequate to be used as reference for the formative t-MOOC, followed by INTEF. This result is logical, since the latter is inspired by the former. These findings do not question the validity of the other competency frameworks, but the preferences granted by the judges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"275-293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"64\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.578\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

摘要

本文考虑了国内外组织和机构对教师数字素养提出的不同建议。介绍了国际环境中最常用的7个能力框架,供通过专家判断进行评估。接下来,选择了最适合后续实现教师数字素养的t-MOOC。这些专家的选择基于七个标准,这些标准有助于建立专家知识系数。这种策略有助于获得所选样本的生存能力。共有412人、155名专家和257名非专家参与了这项研究。在进行专家判断后,在一轮中,得出的结论是,欧洲教师数字能力框架DigCompEdu是最有价值和最适合作为形成性t-MOOC的参考,其次是INTEF。这个结果是合乎逻辑的,因为后者受到前者的启发。这些调查结果并不质疑其他能力框架的有效性,而是质疑法官给予的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Teacher Digital Competence Frameworks Through Expert Judgement: the Use of the Expert Competence Coefficient
In this paper, different proposals made by national and international organizations and institutions on Teacher Digital Literacy are taken into account. The 7 most commonly used competence frameworks in international contexts are presented for evaluation through expert judgment. Next, the most suitable for the subsequent realization of a t-MOOC on Teacher Digital Literacy was selected. The selection of these experts was based on seven criteria that helped to establish the expert knowledge coefficient (EKC). This strategy served to obtain the viability of the selected sample. A total of 412 people, 155 experts and 257 non-experts participated in this study. After conducting the expert judgment, in a single round, it was concluded that the European Framework of Digital Competence for Teachers DigCompEdu is the most valued and adequate to be used as reference for the formative t-MOOC, followed by INTEF. This result is logical, since the latter is inspired by the former. These findings do not question the validity of the other competency frameworks, but the preferences granted by the judges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research
Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: NAER seeks academic articles on educational sciences based on innovative experiences which can contribute the development of the educational sciences in any of their manifestations and provide new approaches to teaching as a response to the deep changes our society is going through.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信