变化与偏差

IF 1.8 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Pablo E. Requena
{"title":"变化与偏差","authors":"Pablo E. Requena","doi":"10.1075/lab.21001.req","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Naturalistic production research has reported that, unlike monolingual peers, children acquiring Spanish as a\n heritage language omit Differential Object Marking (DOM) with animate objects since the earliest stages of language development.\n However, the previous studies investigating longitudinal monolingual and bilingual corpora cannot be compared to each other given\n their different treatment of language-internal variation in DOM use along the animacy scale. Whereas monolingual results excluded\n contexts predicted to be variable, bilingual results combined them with categorical contexts increasing the rate of “errors” in\n the bilingual group. This study reexamines naturalistic production by monolingual and early bilingual children as well as by their\n caregivers using a common methodology that distinguishes categorical from variable DOM contexts. The results indicate that\n longitudinal corpora covering child heritage speakers’ development up to age three do not show evidence of greater omission of DOM\n compared to monolingual children once variability along the animacy scale is accounted for. By contrast, young monolingual and\n bilingual children’s use of Spanish DOM seems target-like based on their input.","PeriodicalId":48664,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation versus deviation\",\"authors\":\"Pablo E. Requena\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lab.21001.req\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Naturalistic production research has reported that, unlike monolingual peers, children acquiring Spanish as a\\n heritage language omit Differential Object Marking (DOM) with animate objects since the earliest stages of language development.\\n However, the previous studies investigating longitudinal monolingual and bilingual corpora cannot be compared to each other given\\n their different treatment of language-internal variation in DOM use along the animacy scale. Whereas monolingual results excluded\\n contexts predicted to be variable, bilingual results combined them with categorical contexts increasing the rate of “errors” in\\n the bilingual group. This study reexamines naturalistic production by monolingual and early bilingual children as well as by their\\n caregivers using a common methodology that distinguishes categorical from variable DOM contexts. The results indicate that\\n longitudinal corpora covering child heritage speakers’ development up to age three do not show evidence of greater omission of DOM\\n compared to monolingual children once variability along the animacy scale is accounted for. By contrast, young monolingual and\\n bilingual children’s use of Spanish DOM seems target-like based on their input.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.21001.req\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.21001.req","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

自然主义生产研究报告称,与单语同龄人不同,从语言发展的早期阶段起,学习西班牙语作为传统语言的儿童就省略了带有动画对象的差异对象标记(DOM)。然而,先前研究纵向单语和双语语料库的研究无法相互比较,因为它们对DOM使用中的语言内部变化的处理方式不同。单语结果排除了预测为可变的上下文,而双语结果将其与分类上下文相结合,增加了双语组的“错误”率。本研究使用一种区分分类和可变DOM上下文的通用方法,重新审视了单语儿童和早期双语儿童以及他们的照顾者的自然主义生产。研究结果表明,一旦考虑到动物性尺度上的可变性,涵盖儿童遗产说话者三岁以下发展的纵向语料库并没有显示出与单语儿童相比DOM遗漏更大的证据。相比之下,年轻的单语和双语儿童对西班牙语DOM的使用似乎是基于他们的输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variation versus deviation
Naturalistic production research has reported that, unlike monolingual peers, children acquiring Spanish as a heritage language omit Differential Object Marking (DOM) with animate objects since the earliest stages of language development. However, the previous studies investigating longitudinal monolingual and bilingual corpora cannot be compared to each other given their different treatment of language-internal variation in DOM use along the animacy scale. Whereas monolingual results excluded contexts predicted to be variable, bilingual results combined them with categorical contexts increasing the rate of “errors” in the bilingual group. This study reexamines naturalistic production by monolingual and early bilingual children as well as by their caregivers using a common methodology that distinguishes categorical from variable DOM contexts. The results indicate that longitudinal corpora covering child heritage speakers’ development up to age three do not show evidence of greater omission of DOM compared to monolingual children once variability along the animacy scale is accounted for. By contrast, young monolingual and bilingual children’s use of Spanish DOM seems target-like based on their input.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism
Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: LAB provides an outlet for cutting-edge, contemporary studies on bilingualism. LAB assumes a broad definition of bilingualism, including: adult L2 acquisition, simultaneous child bilingualism, child L2 acquisition, adult heritage speaker competence, L1 attrition in L2/Ln environments, and adult L3/Ln acquisition. LAB solicits high quality articles of original research assuming any cognitive science approach to understanding the mental representation of bilingual language competence and performance, including cognitive linguistics, emergentism/connectionism, generative theories, psycholinguistic and processing accounts, and covering typical and atypical populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信