写作促进知识:可读性对OSCM中知识传播的影响

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Seongkyoon Jeong, Zachary S. Rogers, Seth Washispack
{"title":"写作促进知识:可读性对OSCM中知识传播的影响","authors":"Seongkyoon Jeong,&nbsp;Zachary S. Rogers,&nbsp;Seth Washispack","doi":"10.1111/deci.12543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The sophistication of academic research often creates a cognitive barrier for readers when they understand and utilize new knowledge. Cognizant of this issue, scholars in various fields, including Operations and Supply Chain Management (OSCM), have called for improved communication in academic research. Readability is a key pillar of written communication and is particularly important in OSCM. This is partially because OSCM articles tend to be diverse in terms of methods, theoretical lenses used, and author origins. OSCM is also a field where knowledge is created with the purpose of interfacing with real business problems closely and engaging with diverse external stakeholders. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between readability and knowledge diffusion in academic OSCM research. Using cognitive load as the theoretical lens for readability, we analyze a full-text dataset of 1476 articles published in leading OSCM journals between 1998 and 2018. We find that readability has a positive impact on citations garnered. This relationship holds over 3-year short-term spans and 6-year long-term spans, indicating lasting effects. In addition, the results show that the impact of readability on knowledge diffusions is nonlinear. This finding confirms the additive nature of cognitive load and suggests that there is a level authors and journal editors should achieve to make their work more understandable and more likely to be diffused. Suggestions are made to help researchers reduce cognitive loads and to increase the likelihood that knowledge generated in their research is more likely to be disseminated by future researchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"54 3","pages":"297-314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/deci.12543","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing to advance knowledge: The impact of readability on knowledge diffusion in OSCM\",\"authors\":\"Seongkyoon Jeong,&nbsp;Zachary S. Rogers,&nbsp;Seth Washispack\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/deci.12543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The sophistication of academic research often creates a cognitive barrier for readers when they understand and utilize new knowledge. Cognizant of this issue, scholars in various fields, including Operations and Supply Chain Management (OSCM), have called for improved communication in academic research. Readability is a key pillar of written communication and is particularly important in OSCM. This is partially because OSCM articles tend to be diverse in terms of methods, theoretical lenses used, and author origins. OSCM is also a field where knowledge is created with the purpose of interfacing with real business problems closely and engaging with diverse external stakeholders. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between readability and knowledge diffusion in academic OSCM research. Using cognitive load as the theoretical lens for readability, we analyze a full-text dataset of 1476 articles published in leading OSCM journals between 1998 and 2018. We find that readability has a positive impact on citations garnered. This relationship holds over 3-year short-term spans and 6-year long-term spans, indicating lasting effects. In addition, the results show that the impact of readability on knowledge diffusions is nonlinear. This finding confirms the additive nature of cognitive load and suggests that there is a level authors and journal editors should achieve to make their work more understandable and more likely to be diffused. Suggestions are made to help researchers reduce cognitive loads and to increase the likelihood that knowledge generated in their research is more likely to be disseminated by future researchers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DECISION SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"297-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/deci.12543\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DECISION SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12543\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

学术研究的复杂性往往会给读者在理解和利用新知识时造成认知障碍。认识到这一问题,包括运营与供应链管理(OSCM)在内的各个领域的学者都呼吁在学术研究中加强沟通。可读性是书面沟通的关键支柱,在OSCM中尤为重要。这部分是因为OSCM文章在方法、使用的理论视角和作者来源方面趋于多样化。OSCM也是一个知识创造的领域,其目的是与实际业务问题紧密结合,并与不同的外部利益相关者接触。摘要本研究的目的是探讨在学术文献管理研究中,可读性与知识扩散之间的关系。以认知负荷作为可读性的理论视角,我们分析了1998年至2018年间发表在主要OSCM期刊上的1476篇文章的全文数据集。我们发现可读性对引用量有积极的影响。这种关系的短期跨度为3年,长期跨度为6年,表明了持久的影响。此外,结果表明,可读性对知识扩散的影响是非线性的。这一发现证实了认知负荷的附加性质,并表明作者和期刊编辑应该达到一个水平,使他们的工作更容易被理解,更有可能被传播。提出了一些建议,以帮助研究人员减少认知负荷,并增加他们在研究中产生的知识更有可能被未来的研究人员传播的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Writing to advance knowledge: The impact of readability on knowledge diffusion in OSCM

The sophistication of academic research often creates a cognitive barrier for readers when they understand and utilize new knowledge. Cognizant of this issue, scholars in various fields, including Operations and Supply Chain Management (OSCM), have called for improved communication in academic research. Readability is a key pillar of written communication and is particularly important in OSCM. This is partially because OSCM articles tend to be diverse in terms of methods, theoretical lenses used, and author origins. OSCM is also a field where knowledge is created with the purpose of interfacing with real business problems closely and engaging with diverse external stakeholders. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between readability and knowledge diffusion in academic OSCM research. Using cognitive load as the theoretical lens for readability, we analyze a full-text dataset of 1476 articles published in leading OSCM journals between 1998 and 2018. We find that readability has a positive impact on citations garnered. This relationship holds over 3-year short-term spans and 6-year long-term spans, indicating lasting effects. In addition, the results show that the impact of readability on knowledge diffusions is nonlinear. This finding confirms the additive nature of cognitive load and suggests that there is a level authors and journal editors should achieve to make their work more understandable and more likely to be diffused. Suggestions are made to help researchers reduce cognitive loads and to increase the likelihood that knowledge generated in their research is more likely to be disseminated by future researchers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DECISION SCIENCES
DECISION SCIENCES MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信