自然科学中的科学思维与推理框架及其在制造业和服务业企业中的适用性

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Svatava Janoušková, Lubomíra Pyskatá Rathouská, Vojtěch Žák, Eva Stratilová Urválková
{"title":"自然科学中的科学思维与推理框架及其在制造业和服务业企业中的适用性","authors":"Svatava Janoušková, Lubomíra Pyskatá Rathouská, Vojtěch Žák, Eva Stratilová Urválková","doi":"10.1080/02635143.2021.1928048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background The competencies for the 21st century are defined as a broad and interrelated system of knowledge, skills, values and attitudes enabling the full application of man in personal and professional life. Regarding the science education competencies combining science and scientific knowledge, as well as skills such as inquiry, critical thinking, analytical thinking, problem solving and decision making should be developed. These higher-order abilities are reflected in the concept of scientific thinking and reasoning that has no specific definition yet, although many employers expect these abilities at their job applicants. Purpose The purpose of this study is to create a framework of scientific thinking and reasoning for knowledge-based companies operating in natural sciences that would meet the needs of these companies. Sample Theoretical research is based on analysis, comparison and synthesis of five relevant scientific and reasoning frameworks from years 1997–2014. Empirical research was an expert survey conducted with seven participants, experts working on key positions inside companies, followed by two interviews with experts outside the companies. Design and methods During the first part of the study a prototype of a scientific thinking and reasoning framework based on the methods of theoretical research was developed. Following empirical part (expert survey) aimed at adjusting the framework based on semi-structured interviews to employees in key positions of companies whose production portfolio or services are based on the knowledge and skills of their employees in natural science disciplines. Results Qualitative analysis of interviews showed that the proposed framework seems as a useful tool for companies that can easier identify the skills and abilities for their employees. Conclusion: The framework has been slightly changed according to results of the analysis and can be used as a supporting tool bridging the gap between those who prepare students for a specific graduate job and the companies that employ graduates.","PeriodicalId":46656,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science & Technological Education","volume":"41 1","pages":"653 - 674"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02635143.2021.1928048","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The scientific thinking and reasoning framework and its applicability to manufacturing and services firms in natural sciences\",\"authors\":\"Svatava Janoušková, Lubomíra Pyskatá Rathouská, Vojtěch Žák, Eva Stratilová Urválková\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02635143.2021.1928048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background The competencies for the 21st century are defined as a broad and interrelated system of knowledge, skills, values and attitudes enabling the full application of man in personal and professional life. Regarding the science education competencies combining science and scientific knowledge, as well as skills such as inquiry, critical thinking, analytical thinking, problem solving and decision making should be developed. These higher-order abilities are reflected in the concept of scientific thinking and reasoning that has no specific definition yet, although many employers expect these abilities at their job applicants. Purpose The purpose of this study is to create a framework of scientific thinking and reasoning for knowledge-based companies operating in natural sciences that would meet the needs of these companies. Sample Theoretical research is based on analysis, comparison and synthesis of five relevant scientific and reasoning frameworks from years 1997–2014. Empirical research was an expert survey conducted with seven participants, experts working on key positions inside companies, followed by two interviews with experts outside the companies. Design and methods During the first part of the study a prototype of a scientific thinking and reasoning framework based on the methods of theoretical research was developed. Following empirical part (expert survey) aimed at adjusting the framework based on semi-structured interviews to employees in key positions of companies whose production portfolio or services are based on the knowledge and skills of their employees in natural science disciplines. Results Qualitative analysis of interviews showed that the proposed framework seems as a useful tool for companies that can easier identify the skills and abilities for their employees. Conclusion: The framework has been slightly changed according to results of the analysis and can be used as a supporting tool bridging the gap between those who prepare students for a specific graduate job and the companies that employ graduates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Science & Technological Education\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"653 - 674\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02635143.2021.1928048\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Science & Technological Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1928048\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science & Technological Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1928048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要背景21世纪的能力被定义为一个广泛而相互关联的知识、技能、价值观和态度体系,使人能够在个人和职业生活中充分发挥作用。在科学教育方面,应培养科学与科学知识相结合的能力,以及探究、批判性思维、分析思维、解决问题和决策等技能。这些更高层次的能力反映在科学思维和推理的概念中,尽管许多雇主希望求职者具备这些能力,但这一概念还没有具体的定义。目的本研究的目的是为在自然科学领域经营的知识型公司创建一个科学思维和推理框架,以满足这些公司的需求。样本理论研究基于对1997-2014年五个相关科学和推理框架的分析、比较和综合。实证研究是一项由七名参与者进行的专家调查,他们是在公司内部担任关键职位的专家,随后对公司外部的专家进行了两次采访。设计和方法在研究的第一部分,基于理论研究方法开发了一个科学思维和推理框架的原型。以下是实证部分(专家调查),旨在根据对公司关键职位员工的半结构化访谈调整框架,这些公司的生产组合或服务基于其员工在自然科学学科的知识和技能。结果访谈的定性分析表明,所提出的框架似乎是一个有用的工具,公司可以更容易地确定其员工的技能和能力。结论:根据分析结果,该框架略有变化,可作为一种支持工具,弥合为学生提供特定研究生工作的公司与雇佣毕业生的公司之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The scientific thinking and reasoning framework and its applicability to manufacturing and services firms in natural sciences
ABSTRACT Background The competencies for the 21st century are defined as a broad and interrelated system of knowledge, skills, values and attitudes enabling the full application of man in personal and professional life. Regarding the science education competencies combining science and scientific knowledge, as well as skills such as inquiry, critical thinking, analytical thinking, problem solving and decision making should be developed. These higher-order abilities are reflected in the concept of scientific thinking and reasoning that has no specific definition yet, although many employers expect these abilities at their job applicants. Purpose The purpose of this study is to create a framework of scientific thinking and reasoning for knowledge-based companies operating in natural sciences that would meet the needs of these companies. Sample Theoretical research is based on analysis, comparison and synthesis of five relevant scientific and reasoning frameworks from years 1997–2014. Empirical research was an expert survey conducted with seven participants, experts working on key positions inside companies, followed by two interviews with experts outside the companies. Design and methods During the first part of the study a prototype of a scientific thinking and reasoning framework based on the methods of theoretical research was developed. Following empirical part (expert survey) aimed at adjusting the framework based on semi-structured interviews to employees in key positions of companies whose production portfolio or services are based on the knowledge and skills of their employees in natural science disciplines. Results Qualitative analysis of interviews showed that the proposed framework seems as a useful tool for companies that can easier identify the skills and abilities for their employees. Conclusion: The framework has been slightly changed according to results of the analysis and can be used as a supporting tool bridging the gap between those who prepare students for a specific graduate job and the companies that employ graduates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Science & Technological Education
Research in Science & Technological Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信