提高混合方法咨询研究的质量：一个协同参与框架

IF 0.8 4区心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL

Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation Pub Date : 2021-02-25 DOI:10.1080/10474412.2021.1887743

B. Nastasi, J. Hitchcock, Raquel Gutiérrez, Stephanie Oshrin

{"title":"提高混合方法咨询研究的质量：一个协同参与框架","authors":"B. Nastasi, J. Hitchcock, Raquel Gutiérrez, Stephanie Oshrin","doi":"10.1080/10474412.2021.1887743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to provide researchers with a framework for promoting high quality mixed methods school-based consultation research. Furthermore, this article is intended for researchers and practitioners interested in evaluating their practice. To meet these objectives, we address quality criteria for quantitative (validity) and qualitative (trustworthiness). From there, we review also multiple schemes for quality (legitimation) criteria in mixed methods and propose a synergistic participatory approach that includes legitimation criteria for the integration of qualitative and quantitative work throughout the research process, from conceptualization to dissemination. Our view of integration also applies to the application of findings, which is an idea aligned with participatory processes inherent in our approach to consultation practice. Finally, we discuss and illustrate the application of legitimation criteria to consultation research and evaluation.","PeriodicalId":46759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10474412.2021.1887743","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting Quality of Mixed Methods Consultation Research: A Synergistic Participatory Framework\",\"authors\":\"B. Nastasi, J. Hitchcock, Raquel Gutiérrez, Stephanie Oshrin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10474412.2021.1887743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to provide researchers with a framework for promoting high quality mixed methods school-based consultation research. Furthermore, this article is intended for researchers and practitioners interested in evaluating their practice. To meet these objectives, we address quality criteria for quantitative (validity) and qualitative (trustworthiness). From there, we review also multiple schemes for quality (legitimation) criteria in mixed methods and propose a synergistic participatory approach that includes legitimation criteria for the integration of qualitative and quantitative work throughout the research process, from conceptualization to dissemination. Our view of integration also applies to the application of findings, which is an idea aligned with participatory processes inherent in our approach to consultation practice. Finally, we discuss and illustrate the application of legitimation criteria to consultation research and evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10474412.2021.1887743\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2021.1887743\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2021.1887743","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要本文旨在为研究者提供一个促进高质量混合方法校本咨询研究的框架。此外，本文旨在为有兴趣评估其实践的研究人员和从业者提供帮助。为了实现这些目标，我们提出了定量（有效性）和定性（可信度）的质量标准。在此基础上，我们还回顾了混合方法中的质量（合法化）标准的多种方案，并提出了一种协同参与的方法，其中包括在从概念化到传播的整个研究过程中整合定性和定量工作的合法化标准。我们的一体化观点也适用于调查结果的应用，这是一个与我们协商实践方法中固有的参与过程相一致的想法。最后，我们讨论并说明了合法化标准在咨询研究和评估中的应用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Promoting Quality of Mixed Methods Consultation Research: A Synergistic Participatory Framework

ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to provide researchers with a framework for promoting high quality mixed methods school-based consultation research. Furthermore, this article is intended for researchers and practitioners interested in evaluating their practice. To meet these objectives, we address quality criteria for quantitative (validity) and qualitative (trustworthiness). From there, we review also multiple schemes for quality (legitimation) criteria in mixed methods and propose a synergistic participatory approach that includes legitimation criteria for the integration of qualitative and quantitative work throughout the research process, from conceptualization to dissemination. Our view of integration also applies to the application of findings, which is an idea aligned with participatory processes inherent in our approach to consultation practice. Finally, we discuss and illustrate the application of legitimation criteria to consultation research and evaluation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

23.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation (JEPC) provides a forum for improving the scientific understanding of consultation and for describing practical strategies to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of consultation services. Consultation is broadly defined as a process that facilitates problem solving for individuals, groups, and organizations. JEPC publishes articles and special thematic issues that describe formal research, evaluate practice, examine the program implementation process, review relevant literature, investigate systems change, discuss salient issues, and carefully document the translation of theory into practice.