{"title":"有说服力地使用政治术语作为术语争议的来源","authors":"J. Mateos","doi":"10.15366/BP2019.20.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emotional meaning that is usually associated with lots of political terms has led, in the frame of political theory, to many disagreements about their use. To illustrate these controversies I will refer to a discussion of Hans Kelsen with Lenin –about the concept of democracy– and another one with Eric Voegelin, that concerns the notion of political representation. To identify what kind of disagreements haven arisen, I will use a classification of terminological controversies provided by Genaro Carrio.","PeriodicalId":40614,"journal":{"name":"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El uso persuasivo de los términos políticos como origen de controversias terminológicas\",\"authors\":\"J. Mateos\",\"doi\":\"10.15366/BP2019.20.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The emotional meaning that is usually associated with lots of political terms has led, in the frame of political theory, to many disagreements about their use. To illustrate these controversies I will refer to a discussion of Hans Kelsen with Lenin –about the concept of democracy– and another one with Eric Voegelin, that concerns the notion of political representation. To identify what kind of disagreements haven arisen, I will use a classification of terminological controversies provided by Genaro Carrio.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15366/BP2019.20.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bajo Palabra-Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/BP2019.20.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
El uso persuasivo de los términos políticos como origen de controversias terminológicas
The emotional meaning that is usually associated with lots of political terms has led, in the frame of political theory, to many disagreements about their use. To illustrate these controversies I will refer to a discussion of Hans Kelsen with Lenin –about the concept of democracy– and another one with Eric Voegelin, that concerns the notion of political representation. To identify what kind of disagreements haven arisen, I will use a classification of terminological controversies provided by Genaro Carrio.