健康教育教师对学生多元文化学习的贡献

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Tuula Nygård, N. Hirvonen, Sari Räisänen, R. Korkeamäki
{"title":"健康教育教师对学生多元文化学习的贡献","authors":"Tuula Nygård, N. Hirvonen, Sari Räisänen, R. Korkeamäki","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2021.2008556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article describes how Finnish health education teachers reflect on their views of multiliteracy and the instructional practices they used to implement it. Narrative interviews were conducted among eight junior high school and high school teachers. Nexus analysis was used to guide the analysis on the teachers’ views and practices. The results indicate that the study participants considered the promotion of multiliteracy to be part of their work as a health education teacher and they implemented multiliteracy instruction in diverse ways, such as assigning information-seeking and production tasks, or by creating role-playing games. However, the study revealed tensions between need-based literacy teaching and curriculum-steered multiliteracy promotion as well as common and novel teaching practices. At its best, reflecting on these tensions can serve as a steppingstone toward professional change and development.","PeriodicalId":45434,"journal":{"name":"Literacy Research and Instruction","volume":"61 1","pages":"402 - 421"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Education Teachers’ Contributions to Students’ Multiliteracy Learning\",\"authors\":\"Tuula Nygård, N. Hirvonen, Sari Räisänen, R. Korkeamäki\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19388071.2021.2008556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article describes how Finnish health education teachers reflect on their views of multiliteracy and the instructional practices they used to implement it. Narrative interviews were conducted among eight junior high school and high school teachers. Nexus analysis was used to guide the analysis on the teachers’ views and practices. The results indicate that the study participants considered the promotion of multiliteracy to be part of their work as a health education teacher and they implemented multiliteracy instruction in diverse ways, such as assigning information-seeking and production tasks, or by creating role-playing games. However, the study revealed tensions between need-based literacy teaching and curriculum-steered multiliteracy promotion as well as common and novel teaching practices. At its best, reflecting on these tensions can serve as a steppingstone toward professional change and development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Literacy Research and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"402 - 421\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Literacy Research and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.2008556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy Research and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.2008556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文描述了芬兰健康教育教师如何反思他们的多元文学观以及他们实施多元文学的教学实践。对八名初中和高中教师进行了叙述性访谈。采用Nexus分析法对教师的观点和实践进行分析。研究结果表明,研究参与者认为促进多元性是他们作为健康教育教师工作的一部分,他们以多种方式实施多元性教学,如分配信息寻求和制作任务,或通过创建角色扮演游戏。然而,该研究揭示了基于需求的识字教学与课程导向的多语篇推广以及常见和新颖的教学实践之间的紧张关系。在最好的情况下,反思这些紧张关系可以成为职业变革和发展的垫脚石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Education Teachers’ Contributions to Students’ Multiliteracy Learning
ABSTRACT This article describes how Finnish health education teachers reflect on their views of multiliteracy and the instructional practices they used to implement it. Narrative interviews were conducted among eight junior high school and high school teachers. Nexus analysis was used to guide the analysis on the teachers’ views and practices. The results indicate that the study participants considered the promotion of multiliteracy to be part of their work as a health education teacher and they implemented multiliteracy instruction in diverse ways, such as assigning information-seeking and production tasks, or by creating role-playing games. However, the study revealed tensions between need-based literacy teaching and curriculum-steered multiliteracy promotion as well as common and novel teaching practices. At its best, reflecting on these tensions can serve as a steppingstone toward professional change and development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy Research and Instruction
Literacy Research and Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction), the official journal of the College Reading Association, is an international refereed professional journal that publishes articles dealing with research and instruction in reading education and allied literacy fields. The journal is especially focused on instructional practices and applied or basic research of special interest to reading and literacy educators. Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信