提高阻抗散射体迭代物理光学收敛性的线性迭代方案的比较

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Jeong-Un Yoo, I. Koh
{"title":"提高阻抗散射体迭代物理光学收敛性的线性迭代方案的比较","authors":"Jeong-Un Yoo, I. Koh","doi":"10.26866/jees.2023.1.l.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional iterative physical optics (IPO) method updates the surface current based on the Jacobi iteration scheme, which typically diverges for large objects. To control the convergence property of the IPO method, other iteration schemes, such as Gauss–Seidel and successive over-relaxation, can be used. In this study, we compare the convergence properties of three iteration schemes for scatterings by five scatterers comprising electrically perfect or imperfect conductors modeled with an impedance material. The accuracy of the IPO method is compared with that of the multi-level fast multipole method.","PeriodicalId":15662,"journal":{"name":"Journal of electromagnetic engineering and science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Linear Iteration Schemes to Improve the Convergence of Iterative Physical Optics for an Impedance Scatterer\",\"authors\":\"Jeong-Un Yoo, I. Koh\",\"doi\":\"10.26866/jees.2023.1.l.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The conventional iterative physical optics (IPO) method updates the surface current based on the Jacobi iteration scheme, which typically diverges for large objects. To control the convergence property of the IPO method, other iteration schemes, such as Gauss–Seidel and successive over-relaxation, can be used. In this study, we compare the convergence properties of three iteration schemes for scatterings by five scatterers comprising electrically perfect or imperfect conductors modeled with an impedance material. The accuracy of the IPO method is compared with that of the multi-level fast multipole method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of electromagnetic engineering and science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of electromagnetic engineering and science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26866/jees.2023.1.l.12\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of electromagnetic engineering and science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26866/jees.2023.1.l.12","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的迭代物理光学(IPO)方法基于Jacobi迭代方案更新表面电流,该方案通常对大型物体发散。为了控制IPO方法的收敛性,可以使用其他迭代方案,如高斯-塞德尔和逐次过松弛。在这项研究中,我们比较了五个散射体散射的三种迭代方案的收敛特性,这些散射体包括用阻抗材料建模的电完美或不完美导体。将IPO方法的精度与多级快速多极方法的精度进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Linear Iteration Schemes to Improve the Convergence of Iterative Physical Optics for an Impedance Scatterer
The conventional iterative physical optics (IPO) method updates the surface current based on the Jacobi iteration scheme, which typically diverges for large objects. To control the convergence property of the IPO method, other iteration schemes, such as Gauss–Seidel and successive over-relaxation, can be used. In this study, we compare the convergence properties of three iteration schemes for scatterings by five scatterers comprising electrically perfect or imperfect conductors modeled with an impedance material. The accuracy of the IPO method is compared with that of the multi-level fast multipole method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of electromagnetic engineering and science
Journal of electromagnetic engineering and science ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science (JEES) is an official English-language journal of the Korean Institute of Electromagnetic and Science (KIEES). This journal was launched in 2001 and has been published quarterly since 2003. It is currently registered with the National Research Foundation of Korea and also indexed in Scopus, CrossRef and EBSCO, DOI/Crossref, Google Scholar and Web of Science Core Collection as Emerging Sources Citation Index(ESCI) Journal. The objective of JEES is to publish academic as well as industrial research results and discoveries in electromagnetic engineering and science. The particular scope of the journal includes electromagnetic field theory and its applications: High frequency components, circuits, and systems, Antennas, smart phones, and radars, Electromagnetic wave environments, Relevant industrial developments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信