特殊教育工作者的十大法律课程

IF 0.6 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Emma Gratton-Fisher, P. Zirkel
{"title":"特殊教育工作者的十大法律课程","authors":"Emma Gratton-Fisher, P. Zirkel","doi":"10.1080/09362835.2020.1727341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to provide special educators with significant and perhaps surprising recent lessons in special education law. These lessons under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act range from the threshold issues of child find and eligibility through the central obligation of free and appropriate public education in the least restrictive environments to specialized issues, such as discipline and the statute of limitations. The conclusion emphasizes that legal requirements in special education are often not absolute and constitute a bottom boundary, different from the generally advisable guiding norm of best practice.","PeriodicalId":46668,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality","volume":"29 1","pages":"41 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2020.1727341","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten Legal Lessons for Special Educators\",\"authors\":\"Emma Gratton-Fisher, P. Zirkel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09362835.2020.1727341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to provide special educators with significant and perhaps surprising recent lessons in special education law. These lessons under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act range from the threshold issues of child find and eligibility through the central obligation of free and appropriate public education in the least restrictive environments to specialized issues, such as discipline and the statute of limitations. The conclusion emphasizes that legal requirements in special education are often not absolute and constitute a bottom boundary, different from the generally advisable guiding norm of best practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exceptionality\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 46\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2020.1727341\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exceptionality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1727341\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1727341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是为特殊教育工作者提供重要的,也许是令人惊讶的特殊教育法的最新教训。根据《残疾人教育法》和《康复法》第504条,这些教训的范围从儿童寻找和资格的门槛问题,到在限制最少的环境中提供免费和适当的公共教育的中心义务,再到专门问题,如纪律和诉讼时效。结论强调,特殊教育的法律要求往往不是绝对的,而是一个底线,不同于一般可取的最佳实践指导规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ten Legal Lessons for Special Educators
ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to provide special educators with significant and perhaps surprising recent lessons in special education law. These lessons under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act range from the threshold issues of child find and eligibility through the central obligation of free and appropriate public education in the least restrictive environments to specialized issues, such as discipline and the statute of limitations. The conclusion emphasizes that legal requirements in special education are often not absolute and constitute a bottom boundary, different from the generally advisable guiding norm of best practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Exceptionality
Exceptionality EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信