{"title":"文化智力作为组织成果的预测因子","authors":"Abel P Lee","doi":"10.1177/14705958231187473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its introduction less than two decades ago, cultural intelligence (CQ) has emerged as a new field of research against the backdrop of globalization to advance our understanding of the required capabilities for individuals and firms to function effectively in contexts characterized by cultural complexity. Despite its recognition as an independent factor within a multi-loci framework of intelligences influencing individual and organizational outcomes, CQ’s nature and conceptualization on the three levels of analysis currently identified are still ambiguous. Consequently, CQ’s associations with proposed outcomes are also undertheorized. Upon a review of the literature, this paper will advance three main arguments, First, aside from the original individual level, clarification is required for CQ on the team and firm levels as to whether it is a collective manifestation of individual CQ or something entirely different. Second, organizational outcomes related to CQ have not been fully imagined, particularly in the contexts of transformations of organizational structures and leadership configurations in the modern economy. Third, the current theoretical framework and future research agenda can be enriched by adding an ethical dimension and a meta-firm level of analysis.","PeriodicalId":46626,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cross Cultural Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural intelligence as a predictor of organizational outcome\",\"authors\":\"Abel P Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14705958231187473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since its introduction less than two decades ago, cultural intelligence (CQ) has emerged as a new field of research against the backdrop of globalization to advance our understanding of the required capabilities for individuals and firms to function effectively in contexts characterized by cultural complexity. Despite its recognition as an independent factor within a multi-loci framework of intelligences influencing individual and organizational outcomes, CQ’s nature and conceptualization on the three levels of analysis currently identified are still ambiguous. Consequently, CQ’s associations with proposed outcomes are also undertheorized. Upon a review of the literature, this paper will advance three main arguments, First, aside from the original individual level, clarification is required for CQ on the team and firm levels as to whether it is a collective manifestation of individual CQ or something entirely different. Second, organizational outcomes related to CQ have not been fully imagined, particularly in the contexts of transformations of organizational structures and leadership configurations in the modern economy. Third, the current theoretical framework and future research agenda can be enriched by adding an ethical dimension and a meta-firm level of analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cross Cultural Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cross Cultural Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14705958231187473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cross Cultural Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14705958231187473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cultural intelligence as a predictor of organizational outcome
Since its introduction less than two decades ago, cultural intelligence (CQ) has emerged as a new field of research against the backdrop of globalization to advance our understanding of the required capabilities for individuals and firms to function effectively in contexts characterized by cultural complexity. Despite its recognition as an independent factor within a multi-loci framework of intelligences influencing individual and organizational outcomes, CQ’s nature and conceptualization on the three levels of analysis currently identified are still ambiguous. Consequently, CQ’s associations with proposed outcomes are also undertheorized. Upon a review of the literature, this paper will advance three main arguments, First, aside from the original individual level, clarification is required for CQ on the team and firm levels as to whether it is a collective manifestation of individual CQ or something entirely different. Second, organizational outcomes related to CQ have not been fully imagined, particularly in the contexts of transformations of organizational structures and leadership configurations in the modern economy. Third, the current theoretical framework and future research agenda can be enriched by adding an ethical dimension and a meta-firm level of analysis.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Cross Cultural Management is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in cross cultural aspects of management, work and organization. The International Journal of Cross Cultural Management (IJCCM) aims to provide a specialized academic medium and main reference for the encouragement and dissemination of research on cross cultural aspects of management, work and organization. This includes both original qualitative and quantitative empirical work as well as theoretical and conceptual work which adds to the understanding of management across cultures.