灵活性是关键：共同创建程序教学评估的评估准则

IF 0.9 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Communications in Information Literacy Pub Date : 2022-06-06 DOI:10.15760/comminfolit.2022.16.1.3

Maya Hobscheid, Kristin Kerbavaz

{"title":"灵活性是关键：共同创建程序教学评估的评估准则","authors":"Maya Hobscheid, Kristin Kerbavaz","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2022.16.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes a project undertaken at Grand Valley State University in which a co-creative model was used to develop a rubric for assessing student learning in library instruction. It outlines the design process as well as the training and support provided throughout implementation. It concludes with the authors’ reflections on the successes and challenges of the process and provides recommendations for future projects.","PeriodicalId":44439,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Information Literacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flexibility Is Key: Co-creating a Rubric for Programmatic Instructional Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Maya Hobscheid, Kristin Kerbavaz\",\"doi\":\"10.15760/comminfolit.2022.16.1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes a project undertaken at Grand Valley State University in which a co-creative model was used to develop a rubric for assessing student learning in library instruction. It outlines the design process as well as the training and support provided throughout implementation. It concludes with the authors’ reflections on the successes and challenges of the process and provides recommendations for future projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications in Information Literacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications in Information Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2022.16.1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Information Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2022.16.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文描述了Grand Valley州立大学的一个项目，在该项目中，采用了一种共同创造的模式来开发一个评估学生在图书馆教学中学习情况的准则。它概述了设计过程以及在整个实施过程中提供的培训和支持。最后，作者对该过程的成功和挑战进行了反思，并为未来的项目提供了建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Flexibility Is Key: Co-creating a Rubric for Programmatic Instructional Assessment

This paper describes a project undertaken at Grand Valley State University in which a co-creative model was used to develop a rubric for assessing student learning in library instruction. It outlines the design process as well as the training and support provided throughout implementation. It concludes with the authors’ reflections on the successes and challenges of the process and provides recommendations for future projects.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Communications in Information Literacy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

16 weeks

期刊介绍： Communications in Information Literacy (CIL) is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to advancing research, theory, and practice in the area of information literacy in higher education. CIL is independently published. Furthermore, it is open access in the truest sense; there are no article processing charges or other regressive publication fees. The editors of CIL are solely committed to the investigation of various models and theories of information literacy worldwide, and they remain faithful to principles of open access for academic research.