澳大利亚豆类浓缩蛋白的优化干法加工:蚕豆、黄豌豆和红扁豆种子材料的比较研究

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Legume Science Pub Date : 2022-10-13 DOI:10.1002/leg3.161
Daniel J. Skylas, Joel B. Johnson, John Kalitsis, Sonya Richard, Chris Whiteway, Ian Wesley, Mani Naiker, Ken J. Quail
{"title":"澳大利亚豆类浓缩蛋白的优化干法加工:蚕豆、黄豌豆和红扁豆种子材料的比较研究","authors":"Daniel J. Skylas,&nbsp;Joel B. Johnson,&nbsp;John Kalitsis,&nbsp;Sonya Richard,&nbsp;Chris Whiteway,&nbsp;Ian Wesley,&nbsp;Mani Naiker,&nbsp;Ken J. Quail","doi":"10.1002/leg3.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Milling and air classification settings were optimised for production of protein concentrates from Australian faba bean, yellow pea and red lentil seed material. Pulses were milled to flour of three progressively finer particle size distributions (D<sub>50</sub> of 23–25, 16–18 and 13–14 μm) and air classified at classifier wheel speeds of 7080, 9600 and 10,200 rpm. Maximum protein concentration was reported for pulse flours (D<sub>50</sub> of 13–14 μm) at 9600 rpm. Protein concentrations of 61.4, 58.1 and 61.0 g/100 g (db.), reflecting a fold increase in protein content of 1.9, 2.3 and 2.1, were reported for faba bean, yellow pea and red lentil, respectively. Protein, ash, fat and total dietary fibre contents were significantly higher in fine fractions (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), compared with coarse fractions, resulting in protein concentrates with enhanced nutritional properties. Amino acid score (AAS) of protein concentrates highlighted deficiencies in sulphur-containing amino acids, methionine and cysteine (MET + CYS), and tryptophan. Based on the lowest AAS (MET + CYS), protein concentrates were ranked highest for yellow pea (0.75), followed by faba bean (0.58) and red lentil (0.51). Phytochemical analysis demonstrated that bioactive constituents also co-concentrated with protein (fine fraction), potentially leading to protein concentrates with enhanced health benefits. Shelf-life assessment for the original flours and protein concentrates indicated the onset of rancidity after 3 months of storage. As fat content co-concentrated with protein, the rancidity (%) scores were higher for protein concentrates compared with the original flours. This demonstrates the importance of developing effective treatments, suitable for dry processing, which can extend shelf-life and stability of protein concentrate ingredients for domestic and export markets. The objective of this study was to increase the knowledge available on dry processing of protein concentrates from Australian pulses. The information generated from this study will look to inform future commercial scale processing operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17929,"journal":{"name":"Legume Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leg3.161","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimised dry processing of protein concentrates from Australian pulses: A comparative study of faba bean, yellow pea and red lentil seed material\",\"authors\":\"Daniel J. Skylas,&nbsp;Joel B. Johnson,&nbsp;John Kalitsis,&nbsp;Sonya Richard,&nbsp;Chris Whiteway,&nbsp;Ian Wesley,&nbsp;Mani Naiker,&nbsp;Ken J. Quail\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/leg3.161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Milling and air classification settings were optimised for production of protein concentrates from Australian faba bean, yellow pea and red lentil seed material. Pulses were milled to flour of three progressively finer particle size distributions (D<sub>50</sub> of 23–25, 16–18 and 13–14 μm) and air classified at classifier wheel speeds of 7080, 9600 and 10,200 rpm. Maximum protein concentration was reported for pulse flours (D<sub>50</sub> of 13–14 μm) at 9600 rpm. Protein concentrations of 61.4, 58.1 and 61.0 g/100 g (db.), reflecting a fold increase in protein content of 1.9, 2.3 and 2.1, were reported for faba bean, yellow pea and red lentil, respectively. Protein, ash, fat and total dietary fibre contents were significantly higher in fine fractions (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), compared with coarse fractions, resulting in protein concentrates with enhanced nutritional properties. Amino acid score (AAS) of protein concentrates highlighted deficiencies in sulphur-containing amino acids, methionine and cysteine (MET + CYS), and tryptophan. Based on the lowest AAS (MET + CYS), protein concentrates were ranked highest for yellow pea (0.75), followed by faba bean (0.58) and red lentil (0.51). Phytochemical analysis demonstrated that bioactive constituents also co-concentrated with protein (fine fraction), potentially leading to protein concentrates with enhanced health benefits. Shelf-life assessment for the original flours and protein concentrates indicated the onset of rancidity after 3 months of storage. As fat content co-concentrated with protein, the rancidity (%) scores were higher for protein concentrates compared with the original flours. This demonstrates the importance of developing effective treatments, suitable for dry processing, which can extend shelf-life and stability of protein concentrate ingredients for domestic and export markets. The objective of this study was to increase the knowledge available on dry processing of protein concentrates from Australian pulses. The information generated from this study will look to inform future commercial scale processing operations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legume Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leg3.161\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legume Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leg3.161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legume Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leg3.161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

优化了研磨和空气分类设置,以从澳大利亚蚕豆、黄豌豆和红扁豆种子材料生产蛋白质浓缩物。将脉冲研磨成三种粒度分布逐渐变细的面粉(D50为23–25、16–18和13–14 μm)和以7080、9600和10200的分级机轮速分类的空气 rpm。据报道,脉冲面粉的最大蛋白质浓度(D50,13–14 μm) rpm。61.4、58.1和61.0的蛋白质浓度 g/100 据报道,蚕豆、黄豌豆和红扁豆的蛋白质含量分别增加了1.9、2.3和2.1倍。细颗粒中蛋白质、灰分、脂肪和总膳食纤维含量显著较高(p< 0.05),从而得到具有增强的营养特性的蛋白质浓缩物。蛋白质浓缩物的氨基酸评分(AAS)突出了含硫氨基酸、蛋氨酸和半胱氨酸(MET + CYS)和色氨酸。基于最低AAS(MET + CYS),浓缩蛋白的排名最高的是黄豌豆(0.75),其次是蚕豆(0.58)和红扁豆(0.51)。植物化学分析表明,生物活性成分也与蛋白质(精细组分)共同浓缩,可能导致浓缩蛋白对健康有益。对原始面粉和蛋白浓缩物的保质期评估表明,3天后开始出现酸败 储存数月。由于脂肪含量与蛋白质共同浓缩,与原始面粉相比,蛋白质浓缩物的酸败(%)得分更高。这表明了开发适用于干加工的有效处理方法的重要性,这可以延长浓缩蛋白成分在国内和出口市场的保质期和稳定性。本研究的目的是增加对澳大利亚豆类蛋白浓缩物干法加工的了解。这项研究产生的信息将为未来的商业规模加工操作提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimised dry processing of protein concentrates from Australian pulses: A comparative study of faba bean, yellow pea and red lentil seed material

Optimised dry processing of protein concentrates from Australian pulses: A comparative study of faba bean, yellow pea and red lentil seed material

Milling and air classification settings were optimised for production of protein concentrates from Australian faba bean, yellow pea and red lentil seed material. Pulses were milled to flour of three progressively finer particle size distributions (D50 of 23–25, 16–18 and 13–14 μm) and air classified at classifier wheel speeds of 7080, 9600 and 10,200 rpm. Maximum protein concentration was reported for pulse flours (D50 of 13–14 μm) at 9600 rpm. Protein concentrations of 61.4, 58.1 and 61.0 g/100 g (db.), reflecting a fold increase in protein content of 1.9, 2.3 and 2.1, were reported for faba bean, yellow pea and red lentil, respectively. Protein, ash, fat and total dietary fibre contents were significantly higher in fine fractions (p < 0.05), compared with coarse fractions, resulting in protein concentrates with enhanced nutritional properties. Amino acid score (AAS) of protein concentrates highlighted deficiencies in sulphur-containing amino acids, methionine and cysteine (MET + CYS), and tryptophan. Based on the lowest AAS (MET + CYS), protein concentrates were ranked highest for yellow pea (0.75), followed by faba bean (0.58) and red lentil (0.51). Phytochemical analysis demonstrated that bioactive constituents also co-concentrated with protein (fine fraction), potentially leading to protein concentrates with enhanced health benefits. Shelf-life assessment for the original flours and protein concentrates indicated the onset of rancidity after 3 months of storage. As fat content co-concentrated with protein, the rancidity (%) scores were higher for protein concentrates compared with the original flours. This demonstrates the importance of developing effective treatments, suitable for dry processing, which can extend shelf-life and stability of protein concentrate ingredients for domestic and export markets. The objective of this study was to increase the knowledge available on dry processing of protein concentrates from Australian pulses. The information generated from this study will look to inform future commercial scale processing operations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Legume Science
Legume Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信