教师对研究-实践文章的使用和认知

IF 0.6 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Renée E. Lastrapes, P. Mooney
{"title":"教师对研究-实践文章的使用和认知","authors":"Renée E. Lastrapes, P. Mooney","doi":"10.1080/09362835.2020.1772068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The practitioner journal article has been suggested as a tool to increase teaching professionals’ use of evidence-based educational practices in the classroom. Not much is known about teacher use and opinions of practitioner journal articles. A purposeful sample of 346 preservice teacher candidates and in-service teachers was surveyed about its use of practitioner journal articles and the sample’s presentation preferences. Respondents indicated that they did not read journals but did read articles. The average number of articles read was eight, most often accessed from online search engines. There were more similarities than differences in the preferred presentation of articles across preservice, in-service, general education, and special education teachers surveyed. Respondents preferred shorter articles, written from a practitioner perspective, that included real application vignettes and graphics highlighting student outcome and implementation fidelity data. Research implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46668,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality","volume":"29 1","pages":"375 - 389"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2020.1772068","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers’ Use and Perceptions of Research-to-Practice Articles\",\"authors\":\"Renée E. Lastrapes, P. Mooney\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09362835.2020.1772068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The practitioner journal article has been suggested as a tool to increase teaching professionals’ use of evidence-based educational practices in the classroom. Not much is known about teacher use and opinions of practitioner journal articles. A purposeful sample of 346 preservice teacher candidates and in-service teachers was surveyed about its use of practitioner journal articles and the sample’s presentation preferences. Respondents indicated that they did not read journals but did read articles. The average number of articles read was eight, most often accessed from online search engines. There were more similarities than differences in the preferred presentation of articles across preservice, in-service, general education, and special education teachers surveyed. Respondents preferred shorter articles, written from a practitioner perspective, that included real application vignettes and graphics highlighting student outcome and implementation fidelity data. Research implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exceptionality\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"375 - 389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2020.1772068\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exceptionality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1772068\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1772068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:从业者期刊文章已被建议作为一种工具,以增加教学专业人员在课堂上使用循证教育实践。关于教师的使用和对从业者期刊文章的看法,我们知之甚少。对346名职前教师候选人和在职教师进行了有目的的抽样调查,了解其对从业者期刊文章的使用情况和样本的陈述偏好。受访者表示,他们不读期刊,但读过文章。平均阅读的文章数量为8篇,最常从在线搜索引擎访问。在接受调查的职前、在职、普通教育和特殊教育教师中,文章的偏好呈现与其说是不同,不如说是相似。受访者更喜欢从从业者的角度撰写的简短文章,其中包括真实的应用程序小插曲和突出学生成果和实现保真度数据的图形。讨论了研究意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teachers’ Use and Perceptions of Research-to-Practice Articles
ABSTRACT The practitioner journal article has been suggested as a tool to increase teaching professionals’ use of evidence-based educational practices in the classroom. Not much is known about teacher use and opinions of practitioner journal articles. A purposeful sample of 346 preservice teacher candidates and in-service teachers was surveyed about its use of practitioner journal articles and the sample’s presentation preferences. Respondents indicated that they did not read journals but did read articles. The average number of articles read was eight, most often accessed from online search engines. There were more similarities than differences in the preferred presentation of articles across preservice, in-service, general education, and special education teachers surveyed. Respondents preferred shorter articles, written from a practitioner perspective, that included real application vignettes and graphics highlighting student outcome and implementation fidelity data. Research implications are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Exceptionality
Exceptionality EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信