商品益生菌对临床标本中分离的耐药肠道病原菌的影响

IF 1 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
T. Ishma, A. Akter, Eiva Akter, M. Momo, Raquiba Sultana, S. Munshi, S. Alam, M. Uddin
{"title":"商品益生菌对临床标本中分离的耐药肠道病原菌的影响","authors":"T. Ishma, A. Akter, Eiva Akter, M. Momo, Raquiba Sultana, S. Munshi, S. Alam, M. Uddin","doi":"10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_65_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neoteric times have witnessed antibiotic resistance and the increase of infectious diseases; hence these trends lead people toward natural products. Probiotics are considered a natural source for maintaining human health from the past decades. Owing to their health benefits consuming probiotics nowadays is becoming a very popular approach for managing the digestive tract and immune health of human beings as well as promising against some human diseases. The aim of this study was to observe the inhibitory effect of probiotics on some clinically isolated drug-resistant enteric pathogens. Methods: Six commercially available probiotics (capsules) were collected from different medicine shops of Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Agar well-diffusion technique was employed to observe the antimicrobial efficacy of these samples against different pathogenic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. Different concentrations of the probiotics were subjected to microdilution assay to determine their minimal inhibitory concentration. Results: Gram-negative bacterial pathogens such as Shigella spp., Vibrio spp., Salmonella spp., Klebsiella spp., and Pseudomonas spp. were isolated from clinical specimens. The isolates were biochemically identified and determined to be multidrug resistant. All the probiotic samples contained lactic acid bacteria as conferred by their presence on magnetic resonance spectroscopy agar media and most of them displayed significant antibacterial activity as these samples produced a zone of inhibition against the studied bacterial isolates. Conclusions: The samples showed varying degrees of effectiveness against the clinical pathogens. Luvena, Acteria, Probio, and Good gut exhibited remarkable antibacterial traits, which could effectively inhibit the growth of most of the clinical isolates. On the other hand, samples from Prolacto and Enterogermina merely had an antimicrobial effect. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value at 512 μL was found against the majority of the pathogenic isolates, while 256 μl was recorded to be the lowest MIC value. Hence, the antimicrobial efficacy of the studied samples revealed the potency of the probiotic capsules against drug-resistant enteric pathogens.","PeriodicalId":36500,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of commercial probiotics on the drug-resistant enteric pathogens isolated from clinical specimens\",\"authors\":\"T. Ishma, A. Akter, Eiva Akter, M. Momo, Raquiba Sultana, S. Munshi, S. Alam, M. Uddin\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_65_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Neoteric times have witnessed antibiotic resistance and the increase of infectious diseases; hence these trends lead people toward natural products. Probiotics are considered a natural source for maintaining human health from the past decades. Owing to their health benefits consuming probiotics nowadays is becoming a very popular approach for managing the digestive tract and immune health of human beings as well as promising against some human diseases. The aim of this study was to observe the inhibitory effect of probiotics on some clinically isolated drug-resistant enteric pathogens. Methods: Six commercially available probiotics (capsules) were collected from different medicine shops of Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Agar well-diffusion technique was employed to observe the antimicrobial efficacy of these samples against different pathogenic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. Different concentrations of the probiotics were subjected to microdilution assay to determine their minimal inhibitory concentration. Results: Gram-negative bacterial pathogens such as Shigella spp., Vibrio spp., Salmonella spp., Klebsiella spp., and Pseudomonas spp. were isolated from clinical specimens. The isolates were biochemically identified and determined to be multidrug resistant. All the probiotic samples contained lactic acid bacteria as conferred by their presence on magnetic resonance spectroscopy agar media and most of them displayed significant antibacterial activity as these samples produced a zone of inhibition against the studied bacterial isolates. Conclusions: The samples showed varying degrees of effectiveness against the clinical pathogens. Luvena, Acteria, Probio, and Good gut exhibited remarkable antibacterial traits, which could effectively inhibit the growth of most of the clinical isolates. On the other hand, samples from Prolacto and Enterogermina merely had an antimicrobial effect. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value at 512 μL was found against the majority of the pathogenic isolates, while 256 μl was recorded to be the lowest MIC value. Hence, the antimicrobial efficacy of the studied samples revealed the potency of the probiotic capsules against drug-resistant enteric pathogens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_65_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_65_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近代以来,抗生素耐药性和传染病增加;因此,这些趋势将人们引向天然产品。过去几十年来,益生菌一直被认为是维持人体健康的天然来源。由于益生菌对健康的益处,食用益生菌如今已成为一种非常流行的方法,用于管理人类的消化道和免疫健康,并有望对抗一些人类疾病。本研究的目的是观察益生菌对一些临床分离的耐药肠道病原菌的抑制作用。方法:从孟加拉国达卡市不同药店收集6种市售益生菌(胶囊)。采用琼脂孔扩散技术对临床标本中分离的不同致病菌进行抑菌效果观察。对不同浓度的益生菌进行微稀释试验,以确定其最低抑菌浓度。结果:临床标本中检出革兰氏阴性病原菌志贺氏菌、弧菌、沙门菌、克雷伯氏菌、假单胞菌等。对分离株进行生化鉴定,确定为多重耐药菌株。所有的益生菌样品都含有乳酸菌,这是由于它们存在于磁共振光谱琼脂培养基上,大多数益生菌样品显示出显著的抗菌活性,因为这些样品对所研究的细菌分离物产生了抑制区。结论:样品对临床病原菌有不同程度的防治效果。Luvena、acacia、Probio和Good gut表现出显著的抗菌特性,能有效抑制大多数临床分离株的生长。另一方面,来自Prolacto和Enterogermina的样品仅具有抗菌作用。大多数病原菌的最低抑菌浓度为512 μL,最低抑菌浓度为256 μL。因此,研究样品的抗菌功效揭示了益生菌胶囊对耐药肠道病原体的效力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of commercial probiotics on the drug-resistant enteric pathogens isolated from clinical specimens
Background: Neoteric times have witnessed antibiotic resistance and the increase of infectious diseases; hence these trends lead people toward natural products. Probiotics are considered a natural source for maintaining human health from the past decades. Owing to their health benefits consuming probiotics nowadays is becoming a very popular approach for managing the digestive tract and immune health of human beings as well as promising against some human diseases. The aim of this study was to observe the inhibitory effect of probiotics on some clinically isolated drug-resistant enteric pathogens. Methods: Six commercially available probiotics (capsules) were collected from different medicine shops of Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Agar well-diffusion technique was employed to observe the antimicrobial efficacy of these samples against different pathogenic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. Different concentrations of the probiotics were subjected to microdilution assay to determine their minimal inhibitory concentration. Results: Gram-negative bacterial pathogens such as Shigella spp., Vibrio spp., Salmonella spp., Klebsiella spp., and Pseudomonas spp. were isolated from clinical specimens. The isolates were biochemically identified and determined to be multidrug resistant. All the probiotic samples contained lactic acid bacteria as conferred by their presence on magnetic resonance spectroscopy agar media and most of them displayed significant antibacterial activity as these samples produced a zone of inhibition against the studied bacterial isolates. Conclusions: The samples showed varying degrees of effectiveness against the clinical pathogens. Luvena, Acteria, Probio, and Good gut exhibited remarkable antibacterial traits, which could effectively inhibit the growth of most of the clinical isolates. On the other hand, samples from Prolacto and Enterogermina merely had an antimicrobial effect. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value at 512 μL was found against the majority of the pathogenic isolates, while 256 μl was recorded to be the lowest MIC value. Hence, the antimicrobial efficacy of the studied samples revealed the potency of the probiotic capsules against drug-resistant enteric pathogens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.90%
发文量
24
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信