在追求正义的过程中:超越颜色回避的努力

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Simona Goldin, Debi Khasnabis
{"title":"在追求正义的过程中:超越颜色回避的努力","authors":"Simona Goldin, Debi Khasnabis","doi":"10.1080/00131725.2022.1997307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this issue, titled “In the Pursuit of Justice: Moving Past Color-Evasive Efforts” we focus on educational efforts that were conceived of to improve and expand equity in U.S. public schools, but rather than interrupting injustice, they have often resulted in harm. Our orientation to this tension is grounded in Critical Race Theory, and its central tenet of racial realism (Bell, 1992), meaning the awareness that race and racism are omnipresent even when unnamed. Our work with educators in various spaces and roles has deepened our awareness that educators are, writ large, deeply committed to their students’ well-being. However, the impact of their commitments is variable and vulnerable to the sway of racist systems––especially when educators do not attend to the role of race and racism; or, even worse, when they deliberately obscure or evade the constructs of race and racism. The harmful pervasiveness of colorblindness in schools is well-documented (Milner, 2010, 2012). Annamma et al. (2017) challenged critical scholars to build upon understandings of colorblindness and advocates for a racial ideology of color-evasiveness. We take up the construct of color-evasion in this volume. Annamma (2017) extended Gotanda’s (1991) critique of colorblindness, pointing in particular to its ableist underpinnings and to the passivity implied by the term. These scholars elaborate how, historically, colorblindness has been hailed as a moral highroad for policymaking and designing. Elaborating these points, they provided multiple examples, from the U.S. Constitution’s insistence that all men are created equal to the standards-based movement in educational reform efforts. Wells (2014), for example, critiqued NCLB as “a reflection of the most ‘colorblind’ approach to addressing racial disparities in education: Ignore glaring racial inequality when implementing policies and then bemoan stark racial inequalities in educational outcomes” (p. 1). Annamma and colleagues (2017) thus advocate for a shift to recognizing and intervening upon color-evasiveness to directly confront these tendencies:","PeriodicalId":46482,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATIONAL FORUM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the Pursuit of Justice: Moving Past Color-Evasive Efforts\",\"authors\":\"Simona Goldin, Debi Khasnabis\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00131725.2022.1997307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this issue, titled “In the Pursuit of Justice: Moving Past Color-Evasive Efforts” we focus on educational efforts that were conceived of to improve and expand equity in U.S. public schools, but rather than interrupting injustice, they have often resulted in harm. Our orientation to this tension is grounded in Critical Race Theory, and its central tenet of racial realism (Bell, 1992), meaning the awareness that race and racism are omnipresent even when unnamed. Our work with educators in various spaces and roles has deepened our awareness that educators are, writ large, deeply committed to their students’ well-being. However, the impact of their commitments is variable and vulnerable to the sway of racist systems––especially when educators do not attend to the role of race and racism; or, even worse, when they deliberately obscure or evade the constructs of race and racism. The harmful pervasiveness of colorblindness in schools is well-documented (Milner, 2010, 2012). Annamma et al. (2017) challenged critical scholars to build upon understandings of colorblindness and advocates for a racial ideology of color-evasiveness. We take up the construct of color-evasion in this volume. Annamma (2017) extended Gotanda’s (1991) critique of colorblindness, pointing in particular to its ableist underpinnings and to the passivity implied by the term. These scholars elaborate how, historically, colorblindness has been hailed as a moral highroad for policymaking and designing. Elaborating these points, they provided multiple examples, from the U.S. Constitution’s insistence that all men are created equal to the standards-based movement in educational reform efforts. Wells (2014), for example, critiqued NCLB as “a reflection of the most ‘colorblind’ approach to addressing racial disparities in education: Ignore glaring racial inequality when implementing policies and then bemoan stark racial inequalities in educational outcomes” (p. 1). Annamma and colleagues (2017) thus advocate for a shift to recognizing and intervening upon color-evasiveness to directly confront these tendencies:\",\"PeriodicalId\":46482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EDUCATIONAL FORUM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EDUCATIONAL FORUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2022.1997307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATIONAL FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2022.1997307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这期题为《追求正义:超越逃避颜色的努力》的文章中,我们关注的是旨在改善和扩大美国公立学校公平的教育努力,但这些努力非但没有打断不公正,反而往往造成伤害。我们对这种紧张关系的定位是基于批判性种族理论及其种族现实主义的核心原则(Bell,1992),这意味着即使没有命名,种族和种族主义也无处不在。我们与不同领域和角色的教育工作者的合作加深了我们的意识,即教育工作者总体上致力于学生的福祉。然而,他们的承诺的影响是可变的,容易受到种族主义制度的影响——尤其是当教育工作者没有注意到种族和种族主义的作用时;或者,更糟糕的是,当他们故意模糊或回避种族和种族主义的概念时。学校中普遍存在的有害色盲现象已被充分证明(Milner,20102012)。Annamma等人(2017)挑战批判性学者,要求他们建立在对色盲的理解之上,并倡导色彩回避的种族意识形态。我们在这本书中讨论了颜色回避的概念。Annamma(2017)扩展了Gotanda(1991)对色盲的批判,特别指出了色盲的能力主义基础和该术语所隐含的被动性。这些学者详细阐述了色盲在历史上是如何被誉为决策和设计的道德大道的。在阐述这些观点时,他们提供了多个例子,从美国宪法坚持人人生而平等到教育改革中基于标准的运动。例如,Wells(2014)批评NCLB“反映了解决教育中种族差异的最‘色盲’的方法:在实施政策时忽略明显的种族不平等,然后哀叹教育结果中的明显种族不平等”(第1页)。Annamma及其同事(2017)因此主张转变为认识和干预颜色回避,以直接面对这些趋势:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In the Pursuit of Justice: Moving Past Color-Evasive Efforts
In this issue, titled “In the Pursuit of Justice: Moving Past Color-Evasive Efforts” we focus on educational efforts that were conceived of to improve and expand equity in U.S. public schools, but rather than interrupting injustice, they have often resulted in harm. Our orientation to this tension is grounded in Critical Race Theory, and its central tenet of racial realism (Bell, 1992), meaning the awareness that race and racism are omnipresent even when unnamed. Our work with educators in various spaces and roles has deepened our awareness that educators are, writ large, deeply committed to their students’ well-being. However, the impact of their commitments is variable and vulnerable to the sway of racist systems––especially when educators do not attend to the role of race and racism; or, even worse, when they deliberately obscure or evade the constructs of race and racism. The harmful pervasiveness of colorblindness in schools is well-documented (Milner, 2010, 2012). Annamma et al. (2017) challenged critical scholars to build upon understandings of colorblindness and advocates for a racial ideology of color-evasiveness. We take up the construct of color-evasion in this volume. Annamma (2017) extended Gotanda’s (1991) critique of colorblindness, pointing in particular to its ableist underpinnings and to the passivity implied by the term. These scholars elaborate how, historically, colorblindness has been hailed as a moral highroad for policymaking and designing. Elaborating these points, they provided multiple examples, from the U.S. Constitution’s insistence that all men are created equal to the standards-based movement in educational reform efforts. Wells (2014), for example, critiqued NCLB as “a reflection of the most ‘colorblind’ approach to addressing racial disparities in education: Ignore glaring racial inequality when implementing policies and then bemoan stark racial inequalities in educational outcomes” (p. 1). Annamma and colleagues (2017) thus advocate for a shift to recognizing and intervening upon color-evasiveness to directly confront these tendencies:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EDUCATIONAL FORUM
EDUCATIONAL FORUM EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信