Elizabeth A. Spry , Stephanie R. Aarsman , George J. Youssef , George C. Patton , Jacqui A. Macdonald , Ann Sanson , Kimberley Thomson , Delyse M. Hutchinson , Primrose Letcher , Craig A. Olsson
{"title":"父母抑郁、焦虑与子女婴儿负性情感:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Elizabeth A. Spry , Stephanie R. Aarsman , George J. Youssef , George C. Patton , Jacqui A. Macdonald , Ann Sanson , Kimberley Thomson , Delyse M. Hutchinson , Primrose Letcher , Craig A. Olsson","doi":"10.1016/j.dr.2020.100934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Maternal internalizing symptoms during pregnancy, specifically depression and/or anxiety, are commonly linked to negative affectivity (NA) in infant offspring. These links are commonly attributed to biological effects of the in utero environment on fetal development. However, research suggests that internalizing symptoms before and after pregnancy, as well as in fathers, may also be associated with NA in infant offspring. Such findings suggest greater complexity in transmission than can be explained by biological in utero programming alone. Further, infant NA is often treated as an homogenous construct, yet it covers a range of facets including fear, frustration, sadness, and slow recovery from distress that may each be differentially associated with parent internalizing distress. Here we aimed to (1) meta-analytically quantify associations between maternal and paternal internalizing symptoms and infant offspring NA, (2) examine how associations varied as a function of distinct phenotypic facets of NA, and (3) examine how associations varied by timing of parental symptoms (preconception, antenatal, postnatal) and infant age. Using random-effects meta-analysis, we found that maternal internalizing symptoms were positively associated with infant NA (</span><em>r</em> = 0.17 [95% CI 0.14, 0.21], 42 studies, 149 estimates). Preliminary evidence from studies of fathers likewise suggested a positive association with infant NA (r = 0.13 [95% CI 0.04, 0.22], 6 studies, 40 estimates). We observed associations with the global infant NA construct, as well as effect modification by infant NA facet (maternal <em>r</em> range 0.12–0.22; paternal <em>r</em> range 0.03–0.21). In mothers, there was no evidence of effect modification by timing of internalizing symptoms or infant age; in fathers, preliminary associations were larger for postnatal than antenatal symptoms. Further studies of preconception and paternal symptoms are now needed, and we suggest avenues for research to advance understanding of the relations between parent internalizing symptoms and infant NA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48214,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Review","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 100934"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100934","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal and paternal depression and anxiety and offspring infant negative affectivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth A. Spry , Stephanie R. Aarsman , George J. Youssef , George C. Patton , Jacqui A. Macdonald , Ann Sanson , Kimberley Thomson , Delyse M. Hutchinson , Primrose Letcher , Craig A. Olsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dr.2020.100934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Maternal internalizing symptoms during pregnancy, specifically depression and/or anxiety, are commonly linked to negative affectivity (NA) in infant offspring. These links are commonly attributed to biological effects of the in utero environment on fetal development. However, research suggests that internalizing symptoms before and after pregnancy, as well as in fathers, may also be associated with NA in infant offspring. Such findings suggest greater complexity in transmission than can be explained by biological in utero programming alone. Further, infant NA is often treated as an homogenous construct, yet it covers a range of facets including fear, frustration, sadness, and slow recovery from distress that may each be differentially associated with parent internalizing distress. Here we aimed to (1) meta-analytically quantify associations between maternal and paternal internalizing symptoms and infant offspring NA, (2) examine how associations varied as a function of distinct phenotypic facets of NA, and (3) examine how associations varied by timing of parental symptoms (preconception, antenatal, postnatal) and infant age. Using random-effects meta-analysis, we found that maternal internalizing symptoms were positively associated with infant NA (</span><em>r</em> = 0.17 [95% CI 0.14, 0.21], 42 studies, 149 estimates). Preliminary evidence from studies of fathers likewise suggested a positive association with infant NA (r = 0.13 [95% CI 0.04, 0.22], 6 studies, 40 estimates). We observed associations with the global infant NA construct, as well as effect modification by infant NA facet (maternal <em>r</em> range 0.12–0.22; paternal <em>r</em> range 0.03–0.21). In mothers, there was no evidence of effect modification by timing of internalizing symptoms or infant age; in fathers, preliminary associations were larger for postnatal than antenatal symptoms. Further studies of preconception and paternal symptoms are now needed, and we suggest avenues for research to advance understanding of the relations between parent internalizing symptoms and infant NA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Review\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100934\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027322972030040X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027322972030040X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
摘要
母亲在怀孕期间的内化症状,特别是抑郁和/或焦虑,通常与婴儿后代的负面情感(NA)有关。这些联系通常归因于子宫内环境对胎儿发育的生物学影响。然而,研究表明,怀孕前后以及父亲的内化症状也可能与婴儿后代的NA有关。这些发现表明,传播的复杂性比单靠子宫内生物编程所能解释的要大得多。此外,婴儿不良情绪通常被视为一个同质结构,但它涵盖了一系列方面,包括恐惧、沮丧、悲伤和从痛苦中缓慢恢复,这些方面可能与父母内化痛苦有不同的联系。在这里,我们的目的是(1)荟萃分析量化母亲和父亲的内化症状与婴儿后代NA之间的关联,(2)研究NA的不同表型方面的关联如何变化,以及(3)研究父母症状的时间(孕前、产前、产后)和婴儿年龄之间的关联如何变化。使用随机效应荟萃分析,我们发现母亲内化症状与婴儿NA呈正相关(r = 0.17 [95% CI 0.14, 0.21], 42项研究,149项估计)。来自父亲研究的初步证据同样表明,与婴儿NA呈正相关(r = 0.13 [95% CI 0.04, 0.22], 6项研究,40项估计)。我们观察到与整体婴儿NA结构的关联,以及婴儿NA facet的效应修饰(母体r范围0.12-0.22;父系范围0.03-0.21)。在母亲中,没有证据表明内化症状的时间或婴儿年龄会改变效果;在父亲中,产后症状的初步关联大于产前症状。现在需要进一步研究孕前和父亲症状,我们建议研究途径,以促进理解父母内化症状和婴儿NA之间的关系。
Maternal and paternal depression and anxiety and offspring infant negative affectivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Maternal internalizing symptoms during pregnancy, specifically depression and/or anxiety, are commonly linked to negative affectivity (NA) in infant offspring. These links are commonly attributed to biological effects of the in utero environment on fetal development. However, research suggests that internalizing symptoms before and after pregnancy, as well as in fathers, may also be associated with NA in infant offspring. Such findings suggest greater complexity in transmission than can be explained by biological in utero programming alone. Further, infant NA is often treated as an homogenous construct, yet it covers a range of facets including fear, frustration, sadness, and slow recovery from distress that may each be differentially associated with parent internalizing distress. Here we aimed to (1) meta-analytically quantify associations between maternal and paternal internalizing symptoms and infant offspring NA, (2) examine how associations varied as a function of distinct phenotypic facets of NA, and (3) examine how associations varied by timing of parental symptoms (preconception, antenatal, postnatal) and infant age. Using random-effects meta-analysis, we found that maternal internalizing symptoms were positively associated with infant NA (r = 0.17 [95% CI 0.14, 0.21], 42 studies, 149 estimates). Preliminary evidence from studies of fathers likewise suggested a positive association with infant NA (r = 0.13 [95% CI 0.04, 0.22], 6 studies, 40 estimates). We observed associations with the global infant NA construct, as well as effect modification by infant NA facet (maternal r range 0.12–0.22; paternal r range 0.03–0.21). In mothers, there was no evidence of effect modification by timing of internalizing symptoms or infant age; in fathers, preliminary associations were larger for postnatal than antenatal symptoms. Further studies of preconception and paternal symptoms are now needed, and we suggest avenues for research to advance understanding of the relations between parent internalizing symptoms and infant NA.
期刊介绍:
Presenting research that bears on important conceptual issues in developmental psychology, Developmental Review: Perspectives in Behavior and Cognition provides child and developmental, child clinical, and educational psychologists with authoritative articles that reflect current thinking and cover significant scientific developments. The journal emphasizes human developmental processes and gives particular attention to issues relevant to child developmental psychology. The research concerns issues with important implications for the fields of pediatrics, psychiatry, and education, and increases the understanding of socialization processes.