{"title":"中美英语课堂中纠正反馈与学习者吸收的比较研究","authors":"Weiqing Wang, Shaofeng Li","doi":"10.1080/07908318.2020.1767124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Instructional context plays a crucial role in the learning of a second/foreign language. The present study compared the occurrence of corrective feedback (CF) and learner uptake across two instructional contexts at the tertiary level: English as a second language (ESL) in the US and English as a foreign language (EFL) in China. Analysis of 36 h of observation data showed that (1) recast was the most preferred feedback type in both settings, but with a much higher percentage in the EFL lessons than in the ESL lessons; (2) the distribution of CF was similar in terms of emphasis but was significantly different in terms of linguistic focus; and (3) the overall frequencies of uptake and repair were close between the two settings, but the rates of uptake and repair following explicit correction were significantly higher in the EFL lessons than in the ESL lessons. These findings suggest that although teacher-student interactions across ESL and EFL settings demonstrate a common trend, CF and uptake are not context-free.","PeriodicalId":17945,"journal":{"name":"Language, Culture and Curriculum","volume":"34 1","pages":"35 - 50"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07908318.2020.1767124","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corrective feedback and learner uptake in American ESL and Chinese EFL classrooms: A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Weiqing Wang, Shaofeng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07908318.2020.1767124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Instructional context plays a crucial role in the learning of a second/foreign language. The present study compared the occurrence of corrective feedback (CF) and learner uptake across two instructional contexts at the tertiary level: English as a second language (ESL) in the US and English as a foreign language (EFL) in China. Analysis of 36 h of observation data showed that (1) recast was the most preferred feedback type in both settings, but with a much higher percentage in the EFL lessons than in the ESL lessons; (2) the distribution of CF was similar in terms of emphasis but was significantly different in terms of linguistic focus; and (3) the overall frequencies of uptake and repair were close between the two settings, but the rates of uptake and repair following explicit correction were significantly higher in the EFL lessons than in the ESL lessons. These findings suggest that although teacher-student interactions across ESL and EFL settings demonstrate a common trend, CF and uptake are not context-free.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language, Culture and Curriculum\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"35 - 50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07908318.2020.1767124\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language, Culture and Curriculum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1767124\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language, Culture and Curriculum","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2020.1767124","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Corrective feedback and learner uptake in American ESL and Chinese EFL classrooms: A comparative study
ABSTRACT Instructional context plays a crucial role in the learning of a second/foreign language. The present study compared the occurrence of corrective feedback (CF) and learner uptake across two instructional contexts at the tertiary level: English as a second language (ESL) in the US and English as a foreign language (EFL) in China. Analysis of 36 h of observation data showed that (1) recast was the most preferred feedback type in both settings, but with a much higher percentage in the EFL lessons than in the ESL lessons; (2) the distribution of CF was similar in terms of emphasis but was significantly different in terms of linguistic focus; and (3) the overall frequencies of uptake and repair were close between the two settings, but the rates of uptake and repair following explicit correction were significantly higher in the EFL lessons than in the ESL lessons. These findings suggest that although teacher-student interactions across ESL and EFL settings demonstrate a common trend, CF and uptake are not context-free.
期刊介绍:
Language, Culture and Curriculum is a well-established journal that seeks to enhance the understanding of the relations between the three dimensions of its title. It welcomes work dealing with a wide range of languages (mother tongues, global English, foreign, minority, immigrant, heritage, or endangered languages) in the context of bilingual and multilingual education and first, second or additional language learning. It focuses on research into cultural content, literacy or intercultural and transnational studies, usually related to curriculum development, organisation or implementation. The journal also includes studies of language instruction, teacher training, teaching methods and language-in-education policy. It is open to investigations of language attitudes, beliefs and identities as well as to contributions dealing with language learning processes and language practices inside and outside of the classroom. Language, Culture and Curriculum encourages submissions from a variety of disciplinary approaches. Since its inception in 1988 the journal has tried to cover a wide range of topics and it has disseminated articles from authors from all continents.