青少年对学校媒介素养倡议与日常媒介素养话语的思考

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Tom De Leyn, Cato Waeterloos, Ralf De Wolf, Bart Vanhaelewyn, Koen Ponnet, L. De Marez
{"title":"青少年对学校媒介素养倡议与日常媒介素养话语的思考","authors":"Tom De Leyn, Cato Waeterloos, Ralf De Wolf, Bart Vanhaelewyn, Koen Ponnet, L. De Marez","doi":"10.1080/17482798.2021.1952463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Often coined as digital natives, contemporary teens are ascribed a paradoxical status of skilled but vulnerable media users. Therefore, media literacy initiatives often target young audiences in order to mitigate detrimental media effects as well as to facilitate emancipatory media engagements. The literature on media literacy draws from diverse disciplines (e.g. educational sciences, media studies) and examines a wide range of thematic areas (e.g. privacy, news, citizenship). However, the voices of those who are the target population of media literacy policy and research are seldom heard. We identify the absence of teenagers’ perceptions and experiences as a limitation in contemporary debates on media literacy. Therefore, this study aims to shed light on how teenagers give meaning to media literacy, how they perceive the contemporary discourse on the importance of media literacy for teens, and in which way they encounter concrete media literacy initiatives at school. Based on in-depth interviews with 31 high-school students between 16 and 18 year old, we found how teenagers primarily have a risk discourse in mind when talking about media literacy. Contextualizing these perceptions, it became clear that both the public discourse and media literacy initiatives largely draw from protectionist approaches. IMPACT SUMMARY a. Prior State of Knowledge: Teenagers and children are oftentimes seen as avid but vulnerable media users. Therefore, this demographic is often the target population of media literacy initiatives. Drawing from a wide range of disciplines, the field of media literacy aims to both understand and facilitate youth’s critical engagements with media. b. Novel Contributions: We identify the lack of a meaningful engagement with teenagers’ own conceptualizations of media literacy as a limitation in scholarly and policy debates. To address this, we contextualize how teenagers give meaning to media literacy by exploring their experiences with media literacy discourses and initiatives in secondary education. c. Practical Implications: This study has practical implications for policymakers who aim for an emancipatory approach of media literacy. Gaining insight into teenagers’ perceptions and experiences is paramount to move beyond the top-down development of media literacy initiatives. The results are also important for media literacy researchers because of its implications for future study designs.","PeriodicalId":46908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children and Media","volume":"16 1","pages":"221 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17482798.2021.1952463","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teenagers’ reflections on media literacy initiatives at school and everyday media literacy discourses\",\"authors\":\"Tom De Leyn, Cato Waeterloos, Ralf De Wolf, Bart Vanhaelewyn, Koen Ponnet, L. De Marez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17482798.2021.1952463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Often coined as digital natives, contemporary teens are ascribed a paradoxical status of skilled but vulnerable media users. Therefore, media literacy initiatives often target young audiences in order to mitigate detrimental media effects as well as to facilitate emancipatory media engagements. The literature on media literacy draws from diverse disciplines (e.g. educational sciences, media studies) and examines a wide range of thematic areas (e.g. privacy, news, citizenship). However, the voices of those who are the target population of media literacy policy and research are seldom heard. We identify the absence of teenagers’ perceptions and experiences as a limitation in contemporary debates on media literacy. Therefore, this study aims to shed light on how teenagers give meaning to media literacy, how they perceive the contemporary discourse on the importance of media literacy for teens, and in which way they encounter concrete media literacy initiatives at school. Based on in-depth interviews with 31 high-school students between 16 and 18 year old, we found how teenagers primarily have a risk discourse in mind when talking about media literacy. Contextualizing these perceptions, it became clear that both the public discourse and media literacy initiatives largely draw from protectionist approaches. IMPACT SUMMARY a. Prior State of Knowledge: Teenagers and children are oftentimes seen as avid but vulnerable media users. Therefore, this demographic is often the target population of media literacy initiatives. Drawing from a wide range of disciplines, the field of media literacy aims to both understand and facilitate youth’s critical engagements with media. b. Novel Contributions: We identify the lack of a meaningful engagement with teenagers’ own conceptualizations of media literacy as a limitation in scholarly and policy debates. To address this, we contextualize how teenagers give meaning to media literacy by exploring their experiences with media literacy discourses and initiatives in secondary education. c. Practical Implications: This study has practical implications for policymakers who aim for an emancipatory approach of media literacy. Gaining insight into teenagers’ perceptions and experiences is paramount to move beyond the top-down development of media literacy initiatives. The results are also important for media literacy researchers because of its implications for future study designs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Children and Media\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"221 - 239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17482798.2021.1952463\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Children and Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1952463\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children and Media","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2021.1952463","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

摘要当代青少年通常被称为数字原住民,他们被认为是技术娴熟但易受攻击的媒体用户,这是一种自相矛盾的地位。因此,媒体扫盲倡议往往以年轻受众为目标,以减轻有害的媒体影响,并促进解放媒体参与。关于媒体素养的文献来自不同的学科(如教育科学、媒体研究),并考察了广泛的主题领域(如隐私、新闻、公民身份)。然而,媒体扫盲政策和研究的目标人群的声音很少被听到。我们认为,在当代关于媒体素养的辩论中,缺乏青少年的感知和经历是一个限制。因此,本研究旨在阐明青少年如何赋予媒体素养以意义,他们如何看待当代关于媒体素养对青少年重要性的讨论,以及他们在学校如何遇到具体的媒体素养举措。基于对31名16至18岁的高中生的深入采访,我们发现青少年在谈论媒体素养时主要考虑的是风险话语。将这些看法结合起来,很明显,公共话语和媒体扫盲举措在很大程度上都来自保护主义方法。影响总结a.先前的知识状态:青少年和儿童经常被视为狂热但易受攻击的媒体用户。因此,这一人群往往是媒体扫盲倡议的目标人群。媒体素养领域涉及广泛的学科,旨在了解和促进青年对媒体的批判性参与。b.新颖的贡献:我们认为,在学术和政策辩论中,缺乏对青少年自己的媒体素养概念的有意义的参与是一个限制。为了解决这一问题,我们将青少年如何通过探索他们在中等教育中的媒介素养话语和倡议的经历,赋予媒介素养以意义。c.实际意义:这项研究对旨在解放媒体素养的政策制定者具有实际意义。深入了解青少年的看法和经历对于超越自上而下的媒体扫盲计划至关重要。这一结果对媒体素养研究人员也很重要,因为它对未来的研究设计有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teenagers’ reflections on media literacy initiatives at school and everyday media literacy discourses
ABSTRACT Often coined as digital natives, contemporary teens are ascribed a paradoxical status of skilled but vulnerable media users. Therefore, media literacy initiatives often target young audiences in order to mitigate detrimental media effects as well as to facilitate emancipatory media engagements. The literature on media literacy draws from diverse disciplines (e.g. educational sciences, media studies) and examines a wide range of thematic areas (e.g. privacy, news, citizenship). However, the voices of those who are the target population of media literacy policy and research are seldom heard. We identify the absence of teenagers’ perceptions and experiences as a limitation in contemporary debates on media literacy. Therefore, this study aims to shed light on how teenagers give meaning to media literacy, how they perceive the contemporary discourse on the importance of media literacy for teens, and in which way they encounter concrete media literacy initiatives at school. Based on in-depth interviews with 31 high-school students between 16 and 18 year old, we found how teenagers primarily have a risk discourse in mind when talking about media literacy. Contextualizing these perceptions, it became clear that both the public discourse and media literacy initiatives largely draw from protectionist approaches. IMPACT SUMMARY a. Prior State of Knowledge: Teenagers and children are oftentimes seen as avid but vulnerable media users. Therefore, this demographic is often the target population of media literacy initiatives. Drawing from a wide range of disciplines, the field of media literacy aims to both understand and facilitate youth’s critical engagements with media. b. Novel Contributions: We identify the lack of a meaningful engagement with teenagers’ own conceptualizations of media literacy as a limitation in scholarly and policy debates. To address this, we contextualize how teenagers give meaning to media literacy by exploring their experiences with media literacy discourses and initiatives in secondary education. c. Practical Implications: This study has practical implications for policymakers who aim for an emancipatory approach of media literacy. Gaining insight into teenagers’ perceptions and experiences is paramount to move beyond the top-down development of media literacy initiatives. The results are also important for media literacy researchers because of its implications for future study designs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信