打印版还是iPad?幼儿文本类型共享阅读偏好和行为与父母预测和家庭实践的比较

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Lauren Eutsler, Julia Trotter
{"title":"打印版还是iPad?幼儿文本类型共享阅读偏好和行为与父母预测和家庭实践的比较","authors":"Lauren Eutsler, Julia Trotter","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2020.1777229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Little research has examined young children’s reading preference by text type. We examined 37 children reading, evaluated their reading experience, and surveyed parents for at-home reading practices and parent predictions of their child’s text preference. Framed by social learning theory using a multiple-case study research design, data analysis includes descriptive statistics and multimodal discourse analysis. Though 65% of children chose the digital book, 27% of parent predictions accurately predicted text choice. Discourse and observation analyses show children engage differently between text types. Children’s attention, physical position to the reader, and discourse increased while reading digitally. No child requested to read additional print books whereas 50% who read digitally requested more books. Implications for parents, teachers, and teacher educators support today’s young children as readers.","PeriodicalId":45434,"journal":{"name":"Literacy Research and Instruction","volume":"59 1","pages":"324 - 345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388071.2020.1777229","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Print or iPad? Young Children’s Text Type Shared Reading Preference and Behaviors in Comparison to Parent Predictions and At-home Practices\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Eutsler, Julia Trotter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19388071.2020.1777229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Little research has examined young children’s reading preference by text type. We examined 37 children reading, evaluated their reading experience, and surveyed parents for at-home reading practices and parent predictions of their child’s text preference. Framed by social learning theory using a multiple-case study research design, data analysis includes descriptive statistics and multimodal discourse analysis. Though 65% of children chose the digital book, 27% of parent predictions accurately predicted text choice. Discourse and observation analyses show children engage differently between text types. Children’s attention, physical position to the reader, and discourse increased while reading digitally. No child requested to read additional print books whereas 50% who read digitally requested more books. Implications for parents, teachers, and teacher educators support today’s young children as readers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Literacy Research and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"324 - 345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388071.2020.1777229\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Literacy Research and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1777229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy Research and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1777229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

很少有研究通过文本类型来考察幼儿的阅读偏好。我们检查了37名儿童的阅读情况,评估了他们的阅读体验,并调查了家长在家阅读的做法和家长对孩子文本偏好的预测。以社会学习理论为框架,采用多案例研究设计,数据分析包括描述性统计和多模态语篇分析。尽管65%的孩子选择了电子书,但只有27%的家长预测准确地预测了文本的选择。话语分析和观察分析表明,儿童对不同文本类型的参与存在差异。在数字化阅读中,儿童的注意力、对读者的身体位置和话语都有所增加。没有孩子要求阅读更多的纸质书,而50%的孩子要求阅读更多的电子书。对父母、教师和教师教育工作者的启示支持今天的幼儿作为读者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Print or iPad? Young Children’s Text Type Shared Reading Preference and Behaviors in Comparison to Parent Predictions and At-home Practices
ABSTRACT Little research has examined young children’s reading preference by text type. We examined 37 children reading, evaluated their reading experience, and surveyed parents for at-home reading practices and parent predictions of their child’s text preference. Framed by social learning theory using a multiple-case study research design, data analysis includes descriptive statistics and multimodal discourse analysis. Though 65% of children chose the digital book, 27% of parent predictions accurately predicted text choice. Discourse and observation analyses show children engage differently between text types. Children’s attention, physical position to the reader, and discourse increased while reading digitally. No child requested to read additional print books whereas 50% who read digitally requested more books. Implications for parents, teachers, and teacher educators support today’s young children as readers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy Research and Instruction
Literacy Research and Instruction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Literacy Research and Instruction (formerly Reading Research and Instruction), the official journal of the College Reading Association, is an international refereed professional journal that publishes articles dealing with research and instruction in reading education and allied literacy fields. The journal is especially focused on instructional practices and applied or basic research of special interest to reading and literacy educators. Peer Review Policy: All articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信