{"title":"打印版还是iPad?幼儿文本类型共享阅读偏好和行为与父母预测和家庭实践的比较","authors":"Lauren Eutsler, Julia Trotter","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2020.1777229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Little research has examined young children’s reading preference by text type. We examined 37 children reading, evaluated their reading experience, and surveyed parents for at-home reading practices and parent predictions of their child’s text preference. Framed by social learning theory using a multiple-case study research design, data analysis includes descriptive statistics and multimodal discourse analysis. Though 65% of children chose the digital book, 27% of parent predictions accurately predicted text choice. Discourse and observation analyses show children engage differently between text types. Children’s attention, physical position to the reader, and discourse increased while reading digitally. No child requested to read additional print books whereas 50% who read digitally requested more books. Implications for parents, teachers, and teacher educators support today’s young children as readers.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388071.2020.1777229","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Print or iPad? Young Children’s Text Type Shared Reading Preference and Behaviors in Comparison to Parent Predictions and At-home Practices\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Eutsler, Julia Trotter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19388071.2020.1777229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Little research has examined young children’s reading preference by text type. We examined 37 children reading, evaluated their reading experience, and surveyed parents for at-home reading practices and parent predictions of their child’s text preference. Framed by social learning theory using a multiple-case study research design, data analysis includes descriptive statistics and multimodal discourse analysis. Though 65% of children chose the digital book, 27% of parent predictions accurately predicted text choice. Discourse and observation analyses show children engage differently between text types. Children’s attention, physical position to the reader, and discourse increased while reading digitally. No child requested to read additional print books whereas 50% who read digitally requested more books. Implications for parents, teachers, and teacher educators support today’s young children as readers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19388071.2020.1777229\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1777229\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1777229","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Print or iPad? Young Children’s Text Type Shared Reading Preference and Behaviors in Comparison to Parent Predictions and At-home Practices
ABSTRACT Little research has examined young children’s reading preference by text type. We examined 37 children reading, evaluated their reading experience, and surveyed parents for at-home reading practices and parent predictions of their child’s text preference. Framed by social learning theory using a multiple-case study research design, data analysis includes descriptive statistics and multimodal discourse analysis. Though 65% of children chose the digital book, 27% of parent predictions accurately predicted text choice. Discourse and observation analyses show children engage differently between text types. Children’s attention, physical position to the reader, and discourse increased while reading digitally. No child requested to read additional print books whereas 50% who read digitally requested more books. Implications for parents, teachers, and teacher educators support today’s young children as readers.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.