广告研究中定义和操作的变化——是否合理?

IF 5.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
L. Bergkvist, M. Eisend
{"title":"广告研究中定义和操作的变化——是否合理?","authors":"L. Bergkvist, M. Eisend","doi":"10.1080/00913367.2022.2077268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Many advertising constructs vary considerably in how they are defined and operationalized—variations which result from changes in definitions and operationalizations over time and between studies. These changes undermine the comparability of empirical insights, challenge the integration of insights into an existing body of knowledge, and thereby impede knowledge development in advertising research. This negative effect is why it is crucial to know whether and when changes are needed and justified. In this article, we address definition and operationalization change from a theoretical perspective, identify factors driving changes in definitions and operationalizations, and outline when changes are justified. We then offer recommendations for how to avoid unjustified changes.","PeriodicalId":48337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advertising","volume":"52 1","pages":"468 - 476"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Definitions and Operationalizations in Advertising Research—Justified or Not?\",\"authors\":\"L. Bergkvist, M. Eisend\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00913367.2022.2077268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Many advertising constructs vary considerably in how they are defined and operationalized—variations which result from changes in definitions and operationalizations over time and between studies. These changes undermine the comparability of empirical insights, challenge the integration of insights into an existing body of knowledge, and thereby impede knowledge development in advertising research. This negative effect is why it is crucial to know whether and when changes are needed and justified. In this article, we address definition and operationalization change from a theoretical perspective, identify factors driving changes in definitions and operationalizations, and outline when changes are justified. We then offer recommendations for how to avoid unjustified changes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advertising\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"468 - 476\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advertising\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2077268\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2077268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要许多广告结构在定义和操作方式上存在很大差异,这些差异是由于定义和操作随时间和研究之间的变化而产生的。这些变化破坏了经验见解的可比性,挑战了见解与现有知识体系的整合,从而阻碍了广告研究中的知识发展。这种负面影响就是为什么知道是否以及何时需要和证明变革是合理的至关重要。在这篇文章中,我们从理论角度讨论了定义和操作的变化,确定了驱动定义和操作变化的因素,并概述了何时可以证明这些变化是合理的。然后,我们就如何避免不合理的改变提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in Definitions and Operationalizations in Advertising Research—Justified or Not?
Abstract Many advertising constructs vary considerably in how they are defined and operationalized—variations which result from changes in definitions and operationalizations over time and between studies. These changes undermine the comparability of empirical insights, challenge the integration of insights into an existing body of knowledge, and thereby impede knowledge development in advertising research. This negative effect is why it is crucial to know whether and when changes are needed and justified. In this article, we address definition and operationalization change from a theoretical perspective, identify factors driving changes in definitions and operationalizations, and outline when changes are justified. We then offer recommendations for how to avoid unjustified changes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advertising is the premier journal devoted to the development of advertising theory and its relationship to practice. The major purpose of the Journal is to provide a public forum where ideas about advertising can be expressed. Research dealing with the economic, political, social, and environmental aspects of advertising, and methodological advances in advertising research represent some of the key foci of the Journal. Other topics of interest recently covered by the Journal include the assessment of advertising effectiveness, advertising ethics, and global issues surrounding advertising.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信