Back to the Logic of Paradox

ABSTRACT The author once again offers a definition of paradox that fundamentally differs from a Hegelian notion of contradiction. In a paradox, thought should logically identify and comprehend the mental reproduction of the subject of thought and the object of thought as the nonidentical thought of an unthinkable being. This is why Bibler argues for the emergence of a new logic as the logic of the beginnings of logic, a dialogue of logics whose appearance is due to changing social conditions and a transformation happened in human activity itself. From joint labor, activity becomes universal labor directed at the subject, at which point thinking turns on itself and paradoxes emerge.