需要技术吗?非传统学生对教育技术工具的看法

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Journal of Continuing Higher Education Pub Date : 2019-09-02 DOI:10.1080/07377363.2019.1680266

Catherine A. Cherrstrom, S. Robbins, Carrie J. Boden, Jonathan C. Bixby

{"title":"需要技术吗?非传统学生对教育技术工具的看法","authors":"Catherine A. Cherrstrom, S. Robbins, Carrie J. Boden, Jonathan C. Bixby","doi":"10.1080/07377363.2019.1680266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Improved educational technology provides new opportunities and tools for enhanced teaching and learning. However, low efficacy with technology adversely affects nontraditional students’ course and college outcomes. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine nontraditional student perceptions of educational technology tools. We thematically coded 10 discussion forums and 239 analyses of 125 student-selected tools. This article highlights traditional student voices and presents a list of tools organized by purpose, the template used by students to analyze tools, and student perceptions of tools. Discussed major themes comprise a wide breadth of tools and purposes, differing experiences in applying theory to practice, and tools supporting learning and interaction in multiple domains.","PeriodicalId":44549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Higher Education","volume":"67 1","pages":"109 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07377363.2019.1680266","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Need Tech? Nontraditional Student Perceptions of Educational Technology Tools\",\"authors\":\"Catherine A. Cherrstrom, S. Robbins, Carrie J. Boden, Jonathan C. Bixby\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07377363.2019.1680266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Improved educational technology provides new opportunities and tools for enhanced teaching and learning. However, low efficacy with technology adversely affects nontraditional students’ course and college outcomes. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine nontraditional student perceptions of educational technology tools. We thematically coded 10 discussion forums and 239 analyses of 125 student-selected tools. This article highlights traditional student voices and presents a list of tools organized by purpose, the template used by students to analyze tools, and student perceptions of tools. Discussed major themes comprise a wide breadth of tools and purposes, differing experiences in applying theory to practice, and tools supporting learning and interaction in multiple domains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Continuing Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"109 - 122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07377363.2019.1680266\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Continuing Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2019.1680266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2019.1680266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

改进的教育技术为加强教与学提供了新的机会和工具。然而，低技术效能对非传统学生的课程和大学成绩有不利影响。本质性研究的目的是检验非传统学生对教育技术工具的看法。我们对10个论坛进行了主题编码，并对125个学生选择的工具进行了239次分析。这篇文章强调了传统的学生的声音，并呈现了一个按目的组织的工具列表，学生用来分析工具的模板，以及学生对工具的看法。讨论的主要主题包括广泛的工具和目的，将理论应用于实践的不同经验，以及支持多领域学习和互动的工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Need Tech? Nontraditional Student Perceptions of Educational Technology Tools

Abstract Improved educational technology provides new opportunities and tools for enhanced teaching and learning. However, low efficacy with technology adversely affects nontraditional students’ course and college outcomes. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine nontraditional student perceptions of educational technology tools. We thematically coded 10 discussion forums and 239 analyses of 125 student-selected tools. This article highlights traditional student voices and presents a list of tools organized by purpose, the template used by students to analyze tools, and student perceptions of tools. Discussed major themes comprise a wide breadth of tools and purposes, differing experiences in applying theory to practice, and tools supporting learning and interaction in multiple domains.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Continuing Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

8.30%

发文量