从模拟参与者的角度看临床模拟中的反思过程

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Orna Levin
{"title":"从模拟参与者的角度看临床模拟中的反思过程","authors":"Orna Levin","doi":"10.1080/14623943.2022.2103106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Simulation-based learning (SBL) relies on reflective practices presented from the perspectives of the participants, instructors, and actors. To date, most research in SBL has examined the reflectivity of the simulation participants and simulation instructors; only a few have considered the professional actors’ perspectives, and these did not explore their reflective activity in depth. This study is the first attempt to focus specifically on the reflective practices of the professional simulation actors in the SBL process. Fifteen professional simulation actors participated in this case study. Triangulation was achieved by using three data collection tools: reflections, interviews, and focus groups. An inductive analysis of the data revealed the professional actors’ efforts to establish a reflexive relationship with the simulation participants and its significance in the SBL process. The adoption of the clinical model, originating from the medical field, in the field of teacher education, as well as the study’s focus on the practice of reflectivity rather than on specific content, suggests that the findings regarding the simulation actors’ reflective processes may be applied to other fields.","PeriodicalId":51594,"journal":{"name":"Reflective Practice","volume":"23 1","pages":"635 - 650"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflective processes in clinical simulations from the perspective of the simulation actors\",\"authors\":\"Orna Levin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14623943.2022.2103106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Simulation-based learning (SBL) relies on reflective practices presented from the perspectives of the participants, instructors, and actors. To date, most research in SBL has examined the reflectivity of the simulation participants and simulation instructors; only a few have considered the professional actors’ perspectives, and these did not explore their reflective activity in depth. This study is the first attempt to focus specifically on the reflective practices of the professional simulation actors in the SBL process. Fifteen professional simulation actors participated in this case study. Triangulation was achieved by using three data collection tools: reflections, interviews, and focus groups. An inductive analysis of the data revealed the professional actors’ efforts to establish a reflexive relationship with the simulation participants and its significance in the SBL process. The adoption of the clinical model, originating from the medical field, in the field of teacher education, as well as the study’s focus on the practice of reflectivity rather than on specific content, suggests that the findings regarding the simulation actors’ reflective processes may be applied to other fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"635 - 650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2103106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflective Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2103106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

迄今为止,大多数关于SBL的研究都考察了模拟参与者和模拟讲师的反射率;只有少数人考虑了专业演员的观点,这些都没有深入探讨他们的反思活动。本研究首次尝试专门关注专业模拟行为者在SBL过程中的反思性实践。15名专业模拟演员参与了本案例研究。三角测量是通过使用三种数据收集工具实现的:反思、访谈和焦点小组。对数据的归纳分析揭示了专业行为者与模拟参与者建立反身关系的努力及其在SBL过程中的意义。源于医学领域的临床模式在教师教育领域的采用,以及本研究对反思性实践的关注而非对具体内容的关注,表明关于模拟演员反思性过程的研究结果可以应用于其他领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflective processes in clinical simulations from the perspective of the simulation actors
ABSTRACT Simulation-based learning (SBL) relies on reflective practices presented from the perspectives of the participants, instructors, and actors. To date, most research in SBL has examined the reflectivity of the simulation participants and simulation instructors; only a few have considered the professional actors’ perspectives, and these did not explore their reflective activity in depth. This study is the first attempt to focus specifically on the reflective practices of the professional simulation actors in the SBL process. Fifteen professional simulation actors participated in this case study. Triangulation was achieved by using three data collection tools: reflections, interviews, and focus groups. An inductive analysis of the data revealed the professional actors’ efforts to establish a reflexive relationship with the simulation participants and its significance in the SBL process. The adoption of the clinical model, originating from the medical field, in the field of teacher education, as well as the study’s focus on the practice of reflectivity rather than on specific content, suggests that the findings regarding the simulation actors’ reflective processes may be applied to other fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reflective Practice
Reflective Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信