社会研究方法教师知道什么,做什么?教师教育工作者促进历史讨论的PCK

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
L. Jay
{"title":"社会研究方法教师知道什么,做什么?教师教育工作者促进历史讨论的PCK","authors":"L. Jay","doi":"10.1080/00933104.2022.2113194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Although Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) has been a guiding framework for the development of novice teachers for decades, less attention has been paid to the PCK of teacher educators. This comparative case study analyzes the PCK of two social studies methods instructors as they teach the practice of facilitating historical discussions and examines how two pairs of novices take up that instruction. Findings reveal that relatively small differences in teacher educators’ pedagogy conveyed divergent perspectives on social studies, and the novices’ teaching and reflection came to express elements of their instructors’ PCK. The coherence between novices and instructors revolved around the instructors’ enactment, not the perspectives they expressed in interviews, and emerged in relationship to novices’ incoming PCK. If novices are more influenced by what teacher educators do than what they believe, a more nuanced language of practice is required to understand how instructors develop and enact their PCK.","PeriodicalId":46808,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Research in Social Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"72 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What do social studies methods instructors know and do? Teacher educators’ PCK for facilitating historical discussions\",\"authors\":\"L. Jay\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00933104.2022.2113194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Although Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) has been a guiding framework for the development of novice teachers for decades, less attention has been paid to the PCK of teacher educators. This comparative case study analyzes the PCK of two social studies methods instructors as they teach the practice of facilitating historical discussions and examines how two pairs of novices take up that instruction. Findings reveal that relatively small differences in teacher educators’ pedagogy conveyed divergent perspectives on social studies, and the novices’ teaching and reflection came to express elements of their instructors’ PCK. The coherence between novices and instructors revolved around the instructors’ enactment, not the perspectives they expressed in interviews, and emerged in relationship to novices’ incoming PCK. If novices are more influenced by what teacher educators do than what they believe, a more nuanced language of practice is required to understand how instructors develop and enact their PCK.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Research in Social Education\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"72 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Research in Social Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2113194\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Research in Social Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2113194","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要尽管教学内容知识(PCK)几十年来一直是新手教师发展的指导框架,但教师教育者的PCK却很少受到关注。这项比较案例研究分析了两位社会研究方法讲师在教授促进历史讨论的实践时的PCK,并考察了两对新手是如何接受这一教学的。研究结果表明,教师教育学中相对较小的差异传达了对社会研究的不同看法,而新手的教学和反思开始表达其导师PCK的元素。新手和导师之间的一致性围绕着导师的制定,而不是他们在采访中表达的观点,并与新手即将到来的PCK有关。如果新手更受教师教育者所做的事情的影响,而不是他们所相信的,那么就需要更细致的实践语言来理解教师是如何发展和实施他们的PCK的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What do social studies methods instructors know and do? Teacher educators’ PCK for facilitating historical discussions
ABSTRACT Although Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) has been a guiding framework for the development of novice teachers for decades, less attention has been paid to the PCK of teacher educators. This comparative case study analyzes the PCK of two social studies methods instructors as they teach the practice of facilitating historical discussions and examines how two pairs of novices take up that instruction. Findings reveal that relatively small differences in teacher educators’ pedagogy conveyed divergent perspectives on social studies, and the novices’ teaching and reflection came to express elements of their instructors’ PCK. The coherence between novices and instructors revolved around the instructors’ enactment, not the perspectives they expressed in interviews, and emerged in relationship to novices’ incoming PCK. If novices are more influenced by what teacher educators do than what they believe, a more nuanced language of practice is required to understand how instructors develop and enact their PCK.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theory and Research in Social Education
Theory and Research in Social Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
30.80%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信