以社区为导向的合作评估普遍筛查对学生接受社会、情感和行为干预的影响

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Kristy L. Brann, M. Maras, Mills K. Smith-Millman, J. Splett, Kayla Kilpatrick
{"title":"以社区为导向的合作评估普遍筛查对学生接受社会、情感和行为干预的影响","authors":"Kristy L. Brann, M. Maras, Mills K. Smith-Millman, J. Splett, Kayla Kilpatrick","doi":"10.1080/10474412.2019.1654882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Tiered response models encourage a proactive approach to identification of social-emotional needs and intervention. However, schools experience barriers to adopting and implementing such models that use data to allocate interventions. The current study examines the utility of a universal social-emotional learning (SEL) screening system embedded in an empowerment evaluation framework to improve intervention receipt. Teachers at two primary elementary schools rated all students with an SEL screening system in a tiered response model. The intervention school received screening results with empowerment evaluation supports while the comparison school did not receive screening results and proceeded with intervention decision-making as usual. Intervention receipt results were analyzed with chi-square tests and descriptive comparisons. The intervention school served a greater number of students with interventions, was more likely to intervene for students with SEL need, and implemented a greater number of small-group interventions than the comparison school. Limitations and future directions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10474412.2019.1654882","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Universal Screening with Community-Oriented Collaboration on Students’ Receipt of Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Intervention\",\"authors\":\"Kristy L. Brann, M. Maras, Mills K. Smith-Millman, J. Splett, Kayla Kilpatrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10474412.2019.1654882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Tiered response models encourage a proactive approach to identification of social-emotional needs and intervention. However, schools experience barriers to adopting and implementing such models that use data to allocate interventions. The current study examines the utility of a universal social-emotional learning (SEL) screening system embedded in an empowerment evaluation framework to improve intervention receipt. Teachers at two primary elementary schools rated all students with an SEL screening system in a tiered response model. The intervention school received screening results with empowerment evaluation supports while the comparison school did not receive screening results and proceeded with intervention decision-making as usual. Intervention receipt results were analyzed with chi-square tests and descriptive comparisons. The intervention school served a greater number of students with interventions, was more likely to intervene for students with SEL need, and implemented a greater number of small-group interventions than the comparison school. Limitations and future directions are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10474412.2019.1654882\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2019.1654882\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2019.1654882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要分层反应模型鼓励采取积极主动的方法来识别社会情感需求和干预。然而,学校在采用和实施这种利用数据分配干预措施的模式方面遇到了障碍。目前的研究考察了嵌入赋权评估框架的通用社会情感学习(SEL)筛查系统对提高干预效果的效用。两所小学的教师采用分层反应模型,用SEL筛查系统对所有学生进行评分。干预学校收到了带有赋权评估支持的筛查结果,而对照学校没有收到筛查结果,照常进行干预决策。干预接收结果采用卡方检验和描述性比较进行分析。与对照学校相比,干预学校为更多的学生提供了干预服务,更有可能为有SEL需求的学生进行干预,并实施了更多的小组干预。讨论了局限性和未来的发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Universal Screening with Community-Oriented Collaboration on Students’ Receipt of Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Intervention
ABSTRACT Tiered response models encourage a proactive approach to identification of social-emotional needs and intervention. However, schools experience barriers to adopting and implementing such models that use data to allocate interventions. The current study examines the utility of a universal social-emotional learning (SEL) screening system embedded in an empowerment evaluation framework to improve intervention receipt. Teachers at two primary elementary schools rated all students with an SEL screening system in a tiered response model. The intervention school received screening results with empowerment evaluation supports while the comparison school did not receive screening results and proceeded with intervention decision-making as usual. Intervention receipt results were analyzed with chi-square tests and descriptive comparisons. The intervention school served a greater number of students with interventions, was more likely to intervene for students with SEL need, and implemented a greater number of small-group interventions than the comparison school. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation (JEPC) provides a forum for improving the scientific understanding of consultation and for describing practical strategies to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of consultation services. Consultation is broadly defined as a process that facilitates problem solving for individuals, groups, and organizations. JEPC publishes articles and special thematic issues that describe formal research, evaluate practice, examine the program implementation process, review relevant literature, investigate systems change, discuss salient issues, and carefully document the translation of theory into practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信