拆封参与与影响:多样性对群体专业知识使用的抵消效应

IF 4.3 2区管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT

Academy of Management Discoveries Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.5465/AMD.2018.0044

Anna T. Mayo, A. Woolley, R. Chow

引用次数: 6

摘要

尽管组织经常使用小组来解决复杂的问题，但小组经常不能使用所有可用的专业知识，从而产生次优的解决方案。为了更好地理解为什么会发生这种情况，……

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Unpacking Participation and Influence: Diversity’s Countervailing Effects on Expertise Use in Groups

Although organizations frequently use groups to solve complex problems, groups often fail to use all available expertise, thus generating suboptimal solutions. To better understand why this occurs,...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Academy of Management Discoveries MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

10.00

自引率

3.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： The mission of AMD is to publish phenomenon-driven empirical research that theories of management and organizations neither adequately predict nor explain. Data on these poorly-understood phenomena can come from any source, including ethnographic observations, lab and field experiments, field surveys, meta-analyses, construct validation research, and replication studies. AMD welcomes exploratory research at the pre-theory stage of knowledge development, where it is premature to specify hypotheses, and which generates surprising findings likely to stimulate and guide further exploration and analysis. This research must be grounded in rigorous state-of-the-art methods, present strong and persuasive evidence, and offer interesting and important implications for management theory and practice. Read the Discoveries FAQs.