心理健康多门筛查研究中筛查和识别学生比例的Meta分析

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 Social Sciences
Victor Villarreal, Felicia Castro-Villarreal, Lisa S. Peterson, Madeleine Bear, D. M. Cortés, Tanya Escobedo
{"title":"心理健康多门筛查研究中筛查和识别学生比例的Meta分析","authors":"Victor Villarreal, Felicia Castro-Villarreal, Lisa S. Peterson, Madeleine Bear, D. M. Cortés, Tanya Escobedo","doi":"10.1080/2372966X.2022.2106155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We investigated characteristics of school-based mental health screening using multiple-gating (MG) approaches through a systematic review of the literature and proportional meta-analyses of screening participation and risk identification. The main analyses included 38 studies conducted in the United States. Pooled estimates indicate that approximately 72% of eligible students participated in initial screening, with 82% of eligible students participating in a second assessment. Approximately 24% of students participating in initial screening were identified as at-risk for mental health difficulties, with 65% identified at-risk in a second assessment. Participation rate was significantly associated with the type of consent process used, with participation rates of 55% and 58% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with active consent processes, and participation rates of 90% and 96% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with passive consent processes. Implications for future research and practice are provided. Impact Statement This study presents an initial review of school-based, multiple-gating (MG) mental health screening studies. Results indicate that low participation is a significant barrier to screening, which may influence the generalizability of research in this area. More inclusive practices are recommended, both to increase the number of students supported through screening and to improve research.","PeriodicalId":21555,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology Review","volume":"52 1","pages":"130 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis of Proportions of Students Screened and Identified in Mental Health Multiple-Gate Screening Research\",\"authors\":\"Victor Villarreal, Felicia Castro-Villarreal, Lisa S. Peterson, Madeleine Bear, D. M. Cortés, Tanya Escobedo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2372966X.2022.2106155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We investigated characteristics of school-based mental health screening using multiple-gating (MG) approaches through a systematic review of the literature and proportional meta-analyses of screening participation and risk identification. The main analyses included 38 studies conducted in the United States. Pooled estimates indicate that approximately 72% of eligible students participated in initial screening, with 82% of eligible students participating in a second assessment. Approximately 24% of students participating in initial screening were identified as at-risk for mental health difficulties, with 65% identified at-risk in a second assessment. Participation rate was significantly associated with the type of consent process used, with participation rates of 55% and 58% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with active consent processes, and participation rates of 90% and 96% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with passive consent processes. Implications for future research and practice are provided. Impact Statement This study presents an initial review of school-based, multiple-gating (MG) mental health screening studies. Results indicate that low participation is a significant barrier to screening, which may influence the generalizability of research in this area. More inclusive practices are recommended, both to increase the number of students supported through screening and to improve research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"130 - 143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2022.2106155\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2022.2106155","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要我们通过对文献的系统回顾和筛查参与和风险识别的比例荟萃分析,研究了使用多重门控(MG)方法进行学校心理健康筛查的特点。主要分析包括在美国进行的38项研究。汇总估计表明,约72%的合格学生参加了初步筛查,82%的合格学生参与了第二次评估。大约24%的参与初步筛查的学生被确定为有心理健康困难的风险,65%的学生在第二次评估中被确定为存在风险。参与率与所使用的同意程序类型显著相关,对于采用主动同意程序的研究,参与率在初次筛查和第二次评估中分别为55%和58%,对于采用被动同意程序的调查,参与率分别为90%和96%。对未来的研究和实践提供了启示。影响声明本研究对基于学校的多重门控(MG)心理健康筛查研究进行了初步审查。结果表明,参与度低是筛查的一个重要障碍,这可能会影响该领域研究的可推广性。建议采取更具包容性的做法,既增加通过筛查获得支持的学生人数,又改善研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meta-Analysis of Proportions of Students Screened and Identified in Mental Health Multiple-Gate Screening Research
Abstract We investigated characteristics of school-based mental health screening using multiple-gating (MG) approaches through a systematic review of the literature and proportional meta-analyses of screening participation and risk identification. The main analyses included 38 studies conducted in the United States. Pooled estimates indicate that approximately 72% of eligible students participated in initial screening, with 82% of eligible students participating in a second assessment. Approximately 24% of students participating in initial screening were identified as at-risk for mental health difficulties, with 65% identified at-risk in a second assessment. Participation rate was significantly associated with the type of consent process used, with participation rates of 55% and 58% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with active consent processes, and participation rates of 90% and 96% in initial screening and a second assessment, respectively, for studies with passive consent processes. Implications for future research and practice are provided. Impact Statement This study presents an initial review of school-based, multiple-gating (MG) mental health screening studies. Results indicate that low participation is a significant barrier to screening, which may influence the generalizability of research in this area. More inclusive practices are recommended, both to increase the number of students supported through screening and to improve research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
School Psychology Review
School Psychology Review Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: School Psychology Review (SPR) is a refereed journal published quarterly by NASP. Its primary purpose is to provide a means for communicating scholarly advances in research, training, and practice related to psychology and education, and specifically to school psychology. Of particular interest are articles presenting original, data-based research that can contribute to the development of innovative intervention and prevention strategies and the evaluation of these approaches. SPR presents important conceptual developments and empirical findings from a wide range of disciplines (e.g., educational, child clinical, pediatric, community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信