高等教育中在线同伴领导小组反思实践:基于研讨会的项目评估

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nahielly Palacios, Rumana Rafique, Felix Kwihangana, Xianming Zhao
{"title":"高等教育中在线同伴领导小组反思实践:基于研讨会的项目评估","authors":"Nahielly Palacios, Rumana Rafique, Felix Kwihangana, Xianming Zhao","doi":"10.1080/14623943.2022.2116567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study explores the effects of online Peer-Led Group Reflective Practice (PLGRP) on students undertaking their master’s degree in the UK, during the Covid-19 pandemic. First, it provides an overview of the online seminar-based project called Holistic Academic and Research Reflective Practice (HARRP) which fostered the PLGRP pedagogical approach presented and evaluated here. Next, it delves into the reflective pedagogical approaches that informed the project design, before looking at its effects on students. A qualitative methodology enabled the implementation of an open-ended questionnaire which helped capture students’ thoughts on the project. Results of a thematic analysis suggest that online PLGRP provided opportunities for students to develop their academic and researcher reflexivity, researcher competence as well as their independent and interdependent learning skills. Issues around lack of time to attend seminars and lack of familiarity with working in peer-led reflective groups enabled further suggestions and improvements to the HARRP project. The contribution of this study lies in the way in which PLGRP approach is designed and operationalised with the purposes of helping students make sense of their academic and research journey individually and in groups. This study also shows how individual and peer-led group reflective practices shape one another.","PeriodicalId":51594,"journal":{"name":"Reflective Practice","volume":"23 1","pages":"676 - 689"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online peer-led group reflective practice in higher education: a seminar-based project evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Nahielly Palacios, Rumana Rafique, Felix Kwihangana, Xianming Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14623943.2022.2116567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study explores the effects of online Peer-Led Group Reflective Practice (PLGRP) on students undertaking their master’s degree in the UK, during the Covid-19 pandemic. First, it provides an overview of the online seminar-based project called Holistic Academic and Research Reflective Practice (HARRP) which fostered the PLGRP pedagogical approach presented and evaluated here. Next, it delves into the reflective pedagogical approaches that informed the project design, before looking at its effects on students. A qualitative methodology enabled the implementation of an open-ended questionnaire which helped capture students’ thoughts on the project. Results of a thematic analysis suggest that online PLGRP provided opportunities for students to develop their academic and researcher reflexivity, researcher competence as well as their independent and interdependent learning skills. Issues around lack of time to attend seminars and lack of familiarity with working in peer-led reflective groups enabled further suggestions and improvements to the HARRP project. The contribution of this study lies in the way in which PLGRP approach is designed and operationalised with the purposes of helping students make sense of their academic and research journey individually and in groups. This study also shows how individual and peer-led group reflective practices shape one another.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"676 - 689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2116567\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflective Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2116567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究探讨了在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,在线同伴领导的小组反思实践(PLGRP)对在英国攻读硕士学位的学生的影响。首先,它提供了一个名为整体学术和研究反思实践(HARRP)的在线研讨会项目的概述,该项目促进了本文提出和评估的PLGRP教学方法。接下来,在研究其对学生的影响之前,深入研究了为项目设计提供信息的反思性教学方法。定性方法使开放式问卷的实施成为可能,这有助于捕捉学生对项目的想法。一项专题分析的结果表明,在线PLGRP为学生提供了发展他们的学术和研究反身性、研究能力以及独立和相互依赖的学习技能的机会。由于缺乏参加研讨会的时间,以及缺乏在同行领导的反思小组中工作的熟悉程度,这些问题使HARRP项目得到了进一步的建议和改进。本研究的贡献在于PLGRP方法的设计和运作方式,旨在帮助学生个人和团体理解他们的学术和研究之旅。这项研究还显示了个人和同伴领导的群体反思实践是如何相互影响的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Online peer-led group reflective practice in higher education: a seminar-based project evaluation
ABSTRACT This study explores the effects of online Peer-Led Group Reflective Practice (PLGRP) on students undertaking their master’s degree in the UK, during the Covid-19 pandemic. First, it provides an overview of the online seminar-based project called Holistic Academic and Research Reflective Practice (HARRP) which fostered the PLGRP pedagogical approach presented and evaluated here. Next, it delves into the reflective pedagogical approaches that informed the project design, before looking at its effects on students. A qualitative methodology enabled the implementation of an open-ended questionnaire which helped capture students’ thoughts on the project. Results of a thematic analysis suggest that online PLGRP provided opportunities for students to develop their academic and researcher reflexivity, researcher competence as well as their independent and interdependent learning skills. Issues around lack of time to attend seminars and lack of familiarity with working in peer-led reflective groups enabled further suggestions and improvements to the HARRP project. The contribution of this study lies in the way in which PLGRP approach is designed and operationalised with the purposes of helping students make sense of their academic and research journey individually and in groups. This study also shows how individual and peer-led group reflective practices shape one another.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reflective Practice
Reflective Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信