消极党派时代的党外线索与事实信念

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Suhwoo Ahn, D. Bergan, Dustin Carnahan, R. Barry, Ezgi Ulusoy
{"title":"消极党派时代的党外线索与事实信念","authors":"Suhwoo Ahn, D. Bergan, Dustin Carnahan, R. Barry, Ezgi Ulusoy","doi":"10.1080/15377857.2021.1939570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The rise of negative partisanship raises the possibility that perceptions of what the partisan out-group believes on a factual matter could serve as a cue for one’s own factual beliefs. In the current paper, we present the results of an online experiment using a sample of self-identified conservatives and liberals on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform. Across several statements on various political issues, participants were randomly assigned to receive a corrective message, polling information about the factual beliefs of members from the partisan out-group, or both. We find that while the corrective message improved belief accuracy, information about the out-group did not influence belief accuracy either directly or by moderating the influence of corrections – even among those with the strongest antipathy toward the out-party. We discuss the implications of the results for the role of negative partisanship for misinformation and corrective messages.","PeriodicalId":46259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Marketing","volume":"20 1","pages":"269 - 288"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15377857.2021.1939570","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Out-Party Cues and Factual Beliefs in an Era of Negative Partisanship\",\"authors\":\"Suhwoo Ahn, D. Bergan, Dustin Carnahan, R. Barry, Ezgi Ulusoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15377857.2021.1939570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The rise of negative partisanship raises the possibility that perceptions of what the partisan out-group believes on a factual matter could serve as a cue for one’s own factual beliefs. In the current paper, we present the results of an online experiment using a sample of self-identified conservatives and liberals on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform. Across several statements on various political issues, participants were randomly assigned to receive a corrective message, polling information about the factual beliefs of members from the partisan out-group, or both. We find that while the corrective message improved belief accuracy, information about the out-group did not influence belief accuracy either directly or by moderating the influence of corrections – even among those with the strongest antipathy toward the out-party. We discuss the implications of the results for the role of negative partisanship for misinformation and corrective messages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Political Marketing\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"269 - 288\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15377857.2021.1939570\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Political Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.1939570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.1939570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

消极党派关系的兴起提出了一种可能性,即党派外群体对事实问题的看法可以作为一个人自己的事实信念的线索。在本文中,我们展示了一项在线实验的结果,该实验使用了亚马逊土耳其机械平台上自我认同的保守派和自由派样本。在对各种政治问题的陈述中,参与者被随机分配接收纠正信息,或对党派外群体成员的事实信念进行民意调查,或两者兼而有之。我们发现,虽然纠正信息提高了信念的准确性,但关于外群体的信息并没有直接影响信念的准确性,也没有通过调节纠正的影响来影响信念的准确性——即使在那些对外群体最反感的人身上也是如此。我们讨论了负面党派关系对错误信息和纠正信息的作用的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Out-Party Cues and Factual Beliefs in an Era of Negative Partisanship
Abstract The rise of negative partisanship raises the possibility that perceptions of what the partisan out-group believes on a factual matter could serve as a cue for one’s own factual beliefs. In the current paper, we present the results of an online experiment using a sample of self-identified conservatives and liberals on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform. Across several statements on various political issues, participants were randomly assigned to receive a corrective message, polling information about the factual beliefs of members from the partisan out-group, or both. We find that while the corrective message improved belief accuracy, information about the out-group did not influence belief accuracy either directly or by moderating the influence of corrections – even among those with the strongest antipathy toward the out-party. We discuss the implications of the results for the role of negative partisanship for misinformation and corrective messages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Political Marketing
Journal of Political Marketing POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Journal of Political Marketing aims to be the leading scholarly journal examining the latest developments in the application of marketing methods to politics. As the political world becomes more complex and interwoven, it is imperative for all interested parties to stay abreast of “cutting edge” tools that are used in unique and different ways in countries around the world. The journal goes beyond the application of advertising to politics to study various strategic marketing tools such as: Voter segmentation Candidate positioning Use of multivariate statistical modeling to better understand the thinking and choices made by voters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信