Indita Dorina, B. Mullan, Elizaveta Novoradovskaya
{"title":"应用时间自律理论确定澳大利亚软塑料回收的相关因素","authors":"Indita Dorina, B. Mullan, Elizaveta Novoradovskaya","doi":"10.1080/00049530.2021.2002125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Rigid plastics are accepted by Australian recycling facilities but soft forms are not. Further, single-use soft plastic may only be used once but can take 400 years to break down. As only 12% of plastic is recycled, increasing recycling of soft plastic will decrease negative environmental impacts. This study aims to assess the applicability of temporal self-regulation theory to identify factors that correlated with soft plastic recycling. Method: Participants (N = 318) completed a cross-sectional online questionnaire measuring connectedness beliefs, temporal valuations, intention, habit, self-control and behaviour. Results: Connectedness beliefs and temporal valuations accounted for significant variance in intention (R = .13, p < .001). Intention and habit accounted for significant variance in behaviour (R = .39, p < .001). Habit at low levels moderated the relationship between intention and behaviour but self-control was not a significant moderator between intention and behaviour. Conclusions: Findings provide partial support for temporal self-regulation theory to assess a pro-environmental behaviour. Collecting soft plastic for recycling is largely explained by habit and intention. Moderating effects suggest that strong habit may compensate for weaker intention to carry out the behaviour and vice-versa. Results indicate potential for transferability of the theory for other areas of behavioural research and can inform interventions to encourage soft plastic recycling. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: (1) When used to predict environmental behaviours the theory of planned behaviour has shown good predictive ability but also an intention behaviour gap. (2) Temporal self-regulation theory is used to explain and predict health behaviours and has been successful in closing the observed intention-behaviour gap in the theory of planned behaviour, a key theory in the field. (3) There is a need to effectively recycle soft plastic due to the global increase in plastic pollution and high soft plastic production rates but lack of infrastructure and knowledge regarding how to recycle soft plastic, potentially contributing to overall low plastic recycling rates. What this topic adds: (1) This study is the first to apply temporal self-regulation theory to environmental psychology with partial support for the theory in explaining behaviour. This suggests that temporal self-regulation theory may have utility in environmental psychology. (2) This study explains variance in recycling behaviour and demonstrates ways researchers could intervene to change behaviour. (3) This study is the first to investigate soft plastic recycling behaviour and has identified some of its correlates and directions for future research, which can inform knowledge and interventions to increase rates. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 15 March 2021 Accepted 30 October 2021","PeriodicalId":8871,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying temporal self-regulation theory to identify correlates of soft plastic recycling in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Indita Dorina, B. Mullan, Elizaveta Novoradovskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00049530.2021.2002125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Rigid plastics are accepted by Australian recycling facilities but soft forms are not. Further, single-use soft plastic may only be used once but can take 400 years to break down. As only 12% of plastic is recycled, increasing recycling of soft plastic will decrease negative environmental impacts. This study aims to assess the applicability of temporal self-regulation theory to identify factors that correlated with soft plastic recycling. Method: Participants (N = 318) completed a cross-sectional online questionnaire measuring connectedness beliefs, temporal valuations, intention, habit, self-control and behaviour. Results: Connectedness beliefs and temporal valuations accounted for significant variance in intention (R = .13, p < .001). Intention and habit accounted for significant variance in behaviour (R = .39, p < .001). Habit at low levels moderated the relationship between intention and behaviour but self-control was not a significant moderator between intention and behaviour. Conclusions: Findings provide partial support for temporal self-regulation theory to assess a pro-environmental behaviour. Collecting soft plastic for recycling is largely explained by habit and intention. Moderating effects suggest that strong habit may compensate for weaker intention to carry out the behaviour and vice-versa. Results indicate potential for transferability of the theory for other areas of behavioural research and can inform interventions to encourage soft plastic recycling. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: (1) When used to predict environmental behaviours the theory of planned behaviour has shown good predictive ability but also an intention behaviour gap. (2) Temporal self-regulation theory is used to explain and predict health behaviours and has been successful in closing the observed intention-behaviour gap in the theory of planned behaviour, a key theory in the field. (3) There is a need to effectively recycle soft plastic due to the global increase in plastic pollution and high soft plastic production rates but lack of infrastructure and knowledge regarding how to recycle soft plastic, potentially contributing to overall low plastic recycling rates. What this topic adds: (1) This study is the first to apply temporal self-regulation theory to environmental psychology with partial support for the theory in explaining behaviour. This suggests that temporal self-regulation theory may have utility in environmental psychology. (2) This study explains variance in recycling behaviour and demonstrates ways researchers could intervene to change behaviour. (3) This study is the first to investigate soft plastic recycling behaviour and has identified some of its correlates and directions for future research, which can inform knowledge and interventions to increase rates. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 15 March 2021 Accepted 30 October 2021\",\"PeriodicalId\":8871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.2002125\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.2002125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
目的:澳大利亚回收设施接受硬质塑料,但不接受软塑料。此外,一次性软塑料可能只使用一次,但可能需要400年才能分解。由于只有12%的塑料被回收,增加软塑料的回收将减少对环境的负面影响。本研究旨在评估时间自我调节理论在识别软塑料回收相关因素中的适用性。方法:参与者(N = 318)完成了一份横断面在线问卷,测量了连通性信念、时间价值、意图、习惯、自我控制和行为。结果:连通性信念和时间评价在意向上有显著差异(R = 0.13, p < 0.001)。意向和习惯在行为上有显著差异(R = 0.39, p < 0.001)。低水平的习惯调节了意图和行为之间的关系,而自我控制在意图和行为之间没有显著的调节作用。结论:研究结果为时间自我调节理论评估亲环境行为提供了部分支持。收集软塑料回收利用在很大程度上是由习惯和意图来解释的。调节效应表明,强烈的习惯可能会弥补较弱的行为意图,反之亦然。研究结果表明,该理论在其他行为研究领域具有可转移性,并可以为鼓励软塑料回收的干预措施提供信息。(1)计划行为理论在预测环境行为时表现出良好的预测能力,但也存在意向行为差距。(2)时间自我调节理论被用来解释和预测健康行为,并成功地弥补了计划行为理论中观察到的意图-行为差距,这是该领域的关键理论。(3)由于全球塑料污染的增加和软塑料的高生产率,但缺乏关于如何回收软塑料的基础设施和知识,因此需要有效地回收软塑料,这可能导致整体塑料回收率低。本课题补充:(1)本研究首次将时间自我调节理论应用于环境心理学,部分支持了该理论对行为的解释。这表明时间自我调节理论在环境心理学中可能具有实用价值。(2)本研究解释了回收行为的差异,并展示了研究人员可以干预改变行为的方法。(3)本研究首次调查了软塑料的回收行为,并确定了一些相关因素和未来研究的方向,这可以为提高回收率提供知识和干预措施。文章接收日期2021年3月15日接收日期2021年10月30日
Applying temporal self-regulation theory to identify correlates of soft plastic recycling in Australia
Objective: Rigid plastics are accepted by Australian recycling facilities but soft forms are not. Further, single-use soft plastic may only be used once but can take 400 years to break down. As only 12% of plastic is recycled, increasing recycling of soft plastic will decrease negative environmental impacts. This study aims to assess the applicability of temporal self-regulation theory to identify factors that correlated with soft plastic recycling. Method: Participants (N = 318) completed a cross-sectional online questionnaire measuring connectedness beliefs, temporal valuations, intention, habit, self-control and behaviour. Results: Connectedness beliefs and temporal valuations accounted for significant variance in intention (R = .13, p < .001). Intention and habit accounted for significant variance in behaviour (R = .39, p < .001). Habit at low levels moderated the relationship between intention and behaviour but self-control was not a significant moderator between intention and behaviour. Conclusions: Findings provide partial support for temporal self-regulation theory to assess a pro-environmental behaviour. Collecting soft plastic for recycling is largely explained by habit and intention. Moderating effects suggest that strong habit may compensate for weaker intention to carry out the behaviour and vice-versa. Results indicate potential for transferability of the theory for other areas of behavioural research and can inform interventions to encourage soft plastic recycling. KEY POINTS What is already known about this topic: (1) When used to predict environmental behaviours the theory of planned behaviour has shown good predictive ability but also an intention behaviour gap. (2) Temporal self-regulation theory is used to explain and predict health behaviours and has been successful in closing the observed intention-behaviour gap in the theory of planned behaviour, a key theory in the field. (3) There is a need to effectively recycle soft plastic due to the global increase in plastic pollution and high soft plastic production rates but lack of infrastructure and knowledge regarding how to recycle soft plastic, potentially contributing to overall low plastic recycling rates. What this topic adds: (1) This study is the first to apply temporal self-regulation theory to environmental psychology with partial support for the theory in explaining behaviour. This suggests that temporal self-regulation theory may have utility in environmental psychology. (2) This study explains variance in recycling behaviour and demonstrates ways researchers could intervene to change behaviour. (3) This study is the first to investigate soft plastic recycling behaviour and has identified some of its correlates and directions for future research, which can inform knowledge and interventions to increase rates. ARTICLE HISTORY Received 15 March 2021 Accepted 30 October 2021
期刊介绍:
Australian Journal of Psychology is the premier scientific journal of the Australian Psychological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of psychological research and receives articles on all topics within the broad scope of the discipline. The journal publishes high quality peer-reviewed articles with reviewers and associate editors providing detailed assistance to authors to reach publication. The journal publishes reports of experimental and survey studies, including reports of qualitative investigations, on pure and applied topics in the field of psychology. Articles on clinical psychology or on the professional concerns of applied psychology should be submitted to our sister journals, Australian Psychologist or Clinical Psychologist. The journal publishes occasional reviews of specific topics, theoretical pieces and commentaries on methodological issues. There are also solicited book reviews and comments Annual special issues devoted to a single topic, and guest edited by a specialist editor, are published. The journal regards itself as international in vision and will accept submissions from psychologists in all countries.