新自由主义的政策分析

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Alexis Jones, Stacey Korson, Natasha C. Murray-Everett, Meghan A. Kessler, Dorian L. Harrison, S. Cronenberg, Michael Parrish, M. Parsons
{"title":"新自由主义的政策分析","authors":"Alexis Jones, Stacey Korson, Natasha C. Murray-Everett, Meghan A. Kessler, Dorian L. Harrison, S. Cronenberg, Michael Parrish, M. Parsons","doi":"10.1080/00131725.2020.1790705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The edTPA, a recent example of a teacher candidate assessment, has influenced how teacher education classes are taught and how teacher candidates are learning. We describe three tensions present in candidate narratives during two separate years of edTPA implementation: attention to the edTPA rubrics vs. the student teachers’ real teaching, a focus on Pearson vs. the teacher education program, and candidates’ feelings of being monitored during the process rather than mentored.","PeriodicalId":46482,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATIONAL FORUM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00131725.2020.1790705","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teacher Candidate Tensions with the edTPA: A Neoliberal Policy Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Jones, Stacey Korson, Natasha C. Murray-Everett, Meghan A. Kessler, Dorian L. Harrison, S. Cronenberg, Michael Parrish, M. Parsons\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00131725.2020.1790705\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The edTPA, a recent example of a teacher candidate assessment, has influenced how teacher education classes are taught and how teacher candidates are learning. We describe three tensions present in candidate narratives during two separate years of edTPA implementation: attention to the edTPA rubrics vs. the student teachers’ real teaching, a focus on Pearson vs. the teacher education program, and candidates’ feelings of being monitored during the process rather than mentored.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EDUCATIONAL FORUM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00131725.2020.1790705\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EDUCATIONAL FORUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2020.1790705\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATIONAL FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2020.1790705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

edTPA是最近一个教师候选人评估的例子,它影响了教师教育课程的教学方式和教师候选人的学习方式。我们描述了在实施edTPA的两年中,候选人叙述中出现的三种紧张关系:对edTPA规则的关注与学生教师的实际教学,对Pearson与教师教育计划的关注,以及候选人在过程中被监控而不是指导的感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teacher Candidate Tensions with the edTPA: A Neoliberal Policy Analysis
Abstract The edTPA, a recent example of a teacher candidate assessment, has influenced how teacher education classes are taught and how teacher candidates are learning. We describe three tensions present in candidate narratives during two separate years of edTPA implementation: attention to the edTPA rubrics vs. the student teachers’ real teaching, a focus on Pearson vs. the teacher education program, and candidates’ feelings of being monitored during the process rather than mentored.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EDUCATIONAL FORUM
EDUCATIONAL FORUM EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信