从关键评估到谨慎评估

IF 0.9 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
V. Douglas
{"title":"从关键评估到谨慎评估","authors":"V. Douglas","doi":"10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Teaching Against the Grain: Critical Assessment in the Library Classroom, Maria Accardi sought a critical, feminist approach to assessment that questioned power structures, celebrated learners, and found strength in diverse perspectives and voices. This article expands on Accardi’s work to explore a care-based assessment framework rooted in the foundations of critical assessment, relational-cultural theory, and critical generosity. This includes a critique of the current language of assessment in library and information science literature and higher education; an examination of models for more caring versions of assessment (particularly those from other feminized professions); and a reframing of the conversation around assessment from one of demonstrating value to one of embodying a value of care and connection in learning for both students and librarians.","PeriodicalId":44439,"journal":{"name":"Communications in Information Literacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving from Critical Assessment to Assessment as Care\",\"authors\":\"V. Douglas\",\"doi\":\"10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Teaching Against the Grain: Critical Assessment in the Library Classroom, Maria Accardi sought a critical, feminist approach to assessment that questioned power structures, celebrated learners, and found strength in diverse perspectives and voices. This article expands on Accardi’s work to explore a care-based assessment framework rooted in the foundations of critical assessment, relational-cultural theory, and critical generosity. This includes a critique of the current language of assessment in library and information science literature and higher education; an examination of models for more caring versions of assessment (particularly those from other feminized professions); and a reframing of the conversation around assessment from one of demonstrating value to one of embodying a value of care and connection in learning for both students and librarians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications in Information Literacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications in Information Literacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in Information Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在《逆向教学:图书馆课堂中的批判性评估》一书中,玛丽亚·阿卡迪(Maria Accardi)寻求一种批判性的、女权主义的评估方法,质疑权力结构,赞扬学习者,并在不同的观点和声音中找到力量。本文扩展了Accardi的工作,探索了基于批判性评估、关系文化理论和批判性慷慨的基础上的基于关怀的评估框架。这包括对当前图书馆情报学文献和高等教育评估语言的批判;检查更有爱心的评估模式(特别是来自其他女性化职业的模式);围绕评估的对话从展示价值转变为体现学生和图书馆员在学习中关心和联系的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moving from Critical Assessment to Assessment as Care
In Teaching Against the Grain: Critical Assessment in the Library Classroom, Maria Accardi sought a critical, feminist approach to assessment that questioned power structures, celebrated learners, and found strength in diverse perspectives and voices. This article expands on Accardi’s work to explore a care-based assessment framework rooted in the foundations of critical assessment, relational-cultural theory, and critical generosity. This includes a critique of the current language of assessment in library and information science literature and higher education; an examination of models for more caring versions of assessment (particularly those from other feminized professions); and a reframing of the conversation around assessment from one of demonstrating value to one of embodying a value of care and connection in learning for both students and librarians.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Communications in Information Literacy
Communications in Information Literacy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Communications in Information Literacy (CIL) is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to advancing research, theory, and practice in the area of information literacy in higher education. CIL is independently published. Furthermore, it is open access in the truest sense; there are no article processing charges or other regressive publication fees. The editors of CIL are solely committed to the investigation of various models and theories of information literacy worldwide, and they remain faithful to principles of open access for academic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信