远程心理服务与现场心理服务的效果比较:一个快速系统的证据综述

IF 0.8 4区心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL

Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation Pub Date : 2021-08-25 DOI:10.1080/10474412.2021.1963267

Alexa von Hagen, B. Müller, A. Sędłak, G. Bachmann, J. Herbert, G. Büttner

{"title":"远程心理服务与现场心理服务的效果比较:一个快速系统的证据综述","authors":"Alexa von Hagen, B. Müller, A. Sędłak, G. Bachmann, J. Herbert, G. Büttner","doi":"10.1080/10474412.2021.1963267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic, remote school psychological services have increased notably in many countries. With the aim of supporting evidence-based practices, we conducted a rapid systematic evidence review on the efficacy of remote as compared to in-person school psychological services. From a total of 3,873 references identified through our search, only three (< 1%) met eligibility criteria for this review. One of these studies showed serious risk of bias according to the ROBINS-I rating scale and was therefore excluded. Overall, the limited evidence that we identified indicates that the impact of remote school psychological services on consumer satisfaction and evaluated mental health outcomes of service users is equivalent or slightly higher to in-person school psychological services. However, this information needs to be interpreted with caution due to the scarcity of available data, as well as methodological limitations.","PeriodicalId":46759,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Remote as Compared to In-Person School Psychological Services: A Rapid Systematic Evidence Review\",\"authors\":\"Alexa von Hagen, B. Müller, A. Sędłak, G. Bachmann, J. Herbert, G. Büttner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10474412.2021.1963267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT As a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic, remote school psychological services have increased notably in many countries. With the aim of supporting evidence-based practices, we conducted a rapid systematic evidence review on the efficacy of remote as compared to in-person school psychological services. From a total of 3,873 references identified through our search, only three (< 1%) met eligibility criteria for this review. One of these studies showed serious risk of bias according to the ROBINS-I rating scale and was therefore excluded. Overall, the limited evidence that we identified indicates that the impact of remote school psychological services on consumer satisfaction and evaluated mental health outcomes of service users is equivalent or slightly higher to in-person school psychological services. However, this information needs to be interpreted with caution due to the scarcity of available data, as well as methodological limitations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2021.1963267\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2021.1963267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

受新冠肺炎疫情影响，许多国家的远程学校心理服务显著增加。为了支持基于证据的实践，我们对远程与现场学校心理服务的效果进行了快速系统的证据审查。从我们检索到的3873篇文献中，只有3篇(< 1%)符合本综述的资格标准。其中一项研究根据ROBINS-I评定量表显示存在严重偏倚风险，因此被排除。总的来说，我们发现的有限证据表明，远程学校心理服务对消费者满意度和服务使用者评估的心理健康结果的影响相当于或略高于现场学校心理服务。然而，由于可用数据的缺乏以及方法的限制，需要谨慎解释这些信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Efficacy of Remote as Compared to In-Person School Psychological Services: A Rapid Systematic Evidence Review

ABSTRACT As a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic, remote school psychological services have increased notably in many countries. With the aim of supporting evidence-based practices, we conducted a rapid systematic evidence review on the efficacy of remote as compared to in-person school psychological services. From a total of 3,873 references identified through our search, only three (< 1%) met eligibility criteria for this review. One of these studies showed serious risk of bias according to the ROBINS-I rating scale and was therefore excluded. Overall, the limited evidence that we identified indicates that the impact of remote school psychological services on consumer satisfaction and evaluated mental health outcomes of service users is equivalent or slightly higher to in-person school psychological services. However, this information needs to be interpreted with caution due to the scarcity of available data, as well as methodological limitations.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

23.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation (JEPC) provides a forum for improving the scientific understanding of consultation and for describing practical strategies to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of consultation services. Consultation is broadly defined as a process that facilitates problem solving for individuals, groups, and organizations. JEPC publishes articles and special thematic issues that describe formal research, evaluate practice, examine the program implementation process, review relevant literature, investigate systems change, discuss salient issues, and carefully document the translation of theory into practice.