卫生服务心理学学员对远程监护的偏好和接受程度。

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Sarah M. Thompson, Danielle Keenan-Miller, Daniel I. Dunn, Jacqueline Hersh, K. Saules, S. Graham, Debora J. Bell, Jennifer L. Hames, Alisha M. Wray, Regina Hiraoka, M. Heller, Sarah M. Taber-Thomas, M. Taylor, R. Hawkins, Rebecca L. Schacht, Nancy H. Liu, J. Schwartz, E. H. Akey
{"title":"卫生服务心理学学员对远程监护的偏好和接受程度。","authors":"Sarah M. Thompson, Danielle Keenan-Miller, Daniel I. Dunn, Jacqueline Hersh, K. Saules, S. Graham, Debora J. Bell, Jennifer L. Hames, Alisha M. Wray, Regina Hiraoka, M. Heller, Sarah M. Taber-Thomas, M. Taylor, R. Hawkins, Rebecca L. Schacht, Nancy H. Liu, J. Schwartz, E. H. Akey","doi":"10.1037/tep0000415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Telesupervision is an increasingly common practice in health service psychology training, particularly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little is known about important considerations that may inform the long-term adoption of telesupervision, including its acceptability among trainees, the impact of technology-mediated supervision on critical variables such as the supervisory working alliance, and whether established supervisory best practices can be effectively employed in a telehealth format. The present study provides qualitative and quantitative data on trainee perceptions of telesupervision among a sample of 144 health service psychology students engaged in either telesupervision or hybrid supervision combining telesupervision with in-person meetings within university training clinics in the United States. Trainees completed questionnaires rating supervisory working alliance, metacommunication, quality of supervision, the identified supervisor's use of best practices, and perceptions of COVID-19 danger as well as provided qualitative responses to three open-ended questions exploring expectations around telesupervision as well as perceived advantages and disadvantages. Findings suggest that trainees find telesupervision to be highly acceptable, with over 90% of participants reporting that it met or exceeded their expectations. Ratings of critical variables such as supervisory working alliance, metacommunication, and engagement in best practices generally did not differ between the hybrid and telesupervision groups, nor were these results affected by supervision format (i.e., individual vs. group) or trainee developmental level. Unique benefits and limitations of telesupervision were highlighted. Overall, results suggest that telesupervision is a highly acceptable and beneficial tool in health service psychology training. Considerations for the ongoing use of telesupervision are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Health service psychology trainees find telesupervision to be highly acceptable and report strong supervisory alliances, effective engagement in metacommunication, and utilization of supervisory best practices via telehealth. The widely recommended practice of incorporating at least some in-person meetings was not associated with higher trainee ratings of supervision. Findings suggest that trainees across developmental levels may benefit from telesupervision as an alternative to in-person supervision, which may ultimately increase access to high-quality clinical supervision. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)","PeriodicalId":47035,"journal":{"name":"Training and Education in Professional Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences for and acceptability of telesupervision among health\\n service psychology trainees.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah M. Thompson, Danielle Keenan-Miller, Daniel I. Dunn, Jacqueline Hersh, K. Saules, S. Graham, Debora J. Bell, Jennifer L. Hames, Alisha M. Wray, Regina Hiraoka, M. Heller, Sarah M. Taber-Thomas, M. Taylor, R. Hawkins, Rebecca L. Schacht, Nancy H. Liu, J. Schwartz, E. H. Akey\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tep0000415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Telesupervision is an increasingly common practice in health service psychology training, particularly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little is known about important considerations that may inform the long-term adoption of telesupervision, including its acceptability among trainees, the impact of technology-mediated supervision on critical variables such as the supervisory working alliance, and whether established supervisory best practices can be effectively employed in a telehealth format. The present study provides qualitative and quantitative data on trainee perceptions of telesupervision among a sample of 144 health service psychology students engaged in either telesupervision or hybrid supervision combining telesupervision with in-person meetings within university training clinics in the United States. Trainees completed questionnaires rating supervisory working alliance, metacommunication, quality of supervision, the identified supervisor's use of best practices, and perceptions of COVID-19 danger as well as provided qualitative responses to three open-ended questions exploring expectations around telesupervision as well as perceived advantages and disadvantages. Findings suggest that trainees find telesupervision to be highly acceptable, with over 90% of participants reporting that it met or exceeded their expectations. Ratings of critical variables such as supervisory working alliance, metacommunication, and engagement in best practices generally did not differ between the hybrid and telesupervision groups, nor were these results affected by supervision format (i.e., individual vs. group) or trainee developmental level. Unique benefits and limitations of telesupervision were highlighted. Overall, results suggest that telesupervision is a highly acceptable and beneficial tool in health service psychology training. Considerations for the ongoing use of telesupervision are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Health service psychology trainees find telesupervision to be highly acceptable and report strong supervisory alliances, effective engagement in metacommunication, and utilization of supervisory best practices via telehealth. The widely recommended practice of incorporating at least some in-person meetings was not associated with higher trainee ratings of supervision. Findings suggest that trainees across developmental levels may benefit from telesupervision as an alternative to in-person supervision, which may ultimately increase access to high-quality clinical supervision. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)\",\"PeriodicalId\":47035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Training and Education in Professional Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Training and Education in Professional Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000415\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Training and Education in Professional Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000415","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

远程监护在卫生服务心理培训中越来越普遍,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行的背景下。然而,人们对可能影响长期采用远程监督的重要因素知之甚少,包括受训者对远程监督的接受程度、技术介导的监督对监督工作联盟等关键变量的影响,以及是否可以在远程保健格式中有效地采用现有的监督最佳做法。本研究提供了144名卫生服务心理学学生样本中受训人员对远程监督的看法的定性和定量数据,这些学生在美国大学培训诊所从事远程监督或将远程监督与面对面会议相结合的混合监督。学员完成了对监督工作联盟、元沟通、监督质量、确定的主管使用最佳实践和对COVID-19危险的看法进行评级的问卷调查,并对三个开放式问题提供了定性回答,这些问题探讨了对远程监督的期望以及感知的优势和劣势。调查结果表明,受训者认为远程监督是高度可接受的,超过90%的参与者报告说,远程监督达到或超过了他们的期望。诸如监督工作联盟、元沟通和参与最佳实践等关键变量的评级通常在混合监督组和远程监督组之间没有差异,这些结果也不受监督形式(即个人vs.团体)或学员发展水平的影响。强调了远程监护的独特优势和局限性。综上所述,结果表明远程监护是一种高度可接受和有益的卫生服务心理培训工具。讨论了持续使用远程监控的考虑因素。(心理信息数据库记录(c) 2022 APA,所有权利保留)影响声明卫生服务心理学学员发现远程监督是高度可接受的,并报告了强有力的监督联盟,有效参与元通信,以及通过远程医疗利用监督最佳实践。被广泛推荐的做法是至少安排一些面对面的会议,但这种做法与学员对监管的较高评价无关。研究结果表明,各个发育阶段的受训者都可以从远程监护中受益,作为面对面监护的替代方案,这可能最终增加获得高质量临床监护的机会。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2022 APA,版权所有)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preferences for and acceptability of telesupervision among health service psychology trainees.
Telesupervision is an increasingly common practice in health service psychology training, particularly due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little is known about important considerations that may inform the long-term adoption of telesupervision, including its acceptability among trainees, the impact of technology-mediated supervision on critical variables such as the supervisory working alliance, and whether established supervisory best practices can be effectively employed in a telehealth format. The present study provides qualitative and quantitative data on trainee perceptions of telesupervision among a sample of 144 health service psychology students engaged in either telesupervision or hybrid supervision combining telesupervision with in-person meetings within university training clinics in the United States. Trainees completed questionnaires rating supervisory working alliance, metacommunication, quality of supervision, the identified supervisor's use of best practices, and perceptions of COVID-19 danger as well as provided qualitative responses to three open-ended questions exploring expectations around telesupervision as well as perceived advantages and disadvantages. Findings suggest that trainees find telesupervision to be highly acceptable, with over 90% of participants reporting that it met or exceeded their expectations. Ratings of critical variables such as supervisory working alliance, metacommunication, and engagement in best practices generally did not differ between the hybrid and telesupervision groups, nor were these results affected by supervision format (i.e., individual vs. group) or trainee developmental level. Unique benefits and limitations of telesupervision were highlighted. Overall, results suggest that telesupervision is a highly acceptable and beneficial tool in health service psychology training. Considerations for the ongoing use of telesupervision are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Health service psychology trainees find telesupervision to be highly acceptable and report strong supervisory alliances, effective engagement in metacommunication, and utilization of supervisory best practices via telehealth. The widely recommended practice of incorporating at least some in-person meetings was not associated with higher trainee ratings of supervision. Findings suggest that trainees across developmental levels may benefit from telesupervision as an alternative to in-person supervision, which may ultimately increase access to high-quality clinical supervision. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Association of Postdoctoral and Internship Centers and the American Psychological Association have joined together to publish Training and Education in Professional Psychology, which serves as the primary source for gathering the most important information that contributes to and advances professional psychology education and training. The journal is written for psychologists and other mental health professionals who educate, supervise, and train mental health practitioners during their academic programs as well as during their participation at practicum, internship, and postdoctoral settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信