2014年后《儿童与家庭法》教育心理学家法定评估过程的文化历史活动理论分析

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Zoe Capper, C. Soan
{"title":"2014年后《儿童与家庭法》教育心理学家法定评估过程的文化历史活动理论分析","authors":"Zoe Capper, C. Soan","doi":"10.1080/02667363.2022.2135491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The activity of educational psychologists’ (EPs’) statutory psychological assessment continues to be viewed critically within literature. The current research explores the understanding of EPs and special educational needs and disability (SEND) officers in this activity, considering the 2014/2015 policy reforms. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a single Local Authority (LA) using Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) to explore the constructions of each group. Identified contradictions within the data were explored within a Development Work Research (DWR) Lab to create shared actions. Over time, EPs’ practice has remained constant in its recognised strengths, but identified contradictions within historic literature remained evident. Actions moving forward sought to redevelop graduated assessment processes, promote stronger multi-professional working, strengthen annual review processes, and create effective methods for efficient data collection.","PeriodicalId":45942,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cultural historical activity theory analysis of educational psychologists’ statutory assessment process post- 2014 children and families act\",\"authors\":\"Zoe Capper, C. Soan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02667363.2022.2135491\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The activity of educational psychologists’ (EPs’) statutory psychological assessment continues to be viewed critically within literature. The current research explores the understanding of EPs and special educational needs and disability (SEND) officers in this activity, considering the 2014/2015 policy reforms. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a single Local Authority (LA) using Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) to explore the constructions of each group. Identified contradictions within the data were explored within a Development Work Research (DWR) Lab to create shared actions. Over time, EPs’ practice has remained constant in its recognised strengths, but identified contradictions within historic literature remained evident. Actions moving forward sought to redevelop graduated assessment processes, promote stronger multi-professional working, strengthen annual review processes, and create effective methods for efficient data collection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Psychology in Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Psychology in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2022.2135491\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2022.2135491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

教育心理学家(EPs)的法定心理评估活动在文献中继续被批判性地看待。本研究结合2014/2015年的政策改革,探讨了特殊教育需要及残疾(SEND)人员在这项活动中的理解。采用文化历史活动理论(CHAT)在单个地方当局(LA)进行半结构化访谈,以探索每个群体的结构。在发展工作研究(DWR)实验室中对数据中确定的矛盾进行了探索,以创建共享的行动。随着时间的推移,EPs的实践在其公认的优势中保持不变,但历史文献中发现的矛盾仍然很明显。今后的行动旨在重新制定分级评估程序,促进更强有力的多专业工作,加强年度审查程序,并为高效的数据收集创造有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A cultural historical activity theory analysis of educational psychologists’ statutory assessment process post- 2014 children and families act
ABSTRACT The activity of educational psychologists’ (EPs’) statutory psychological assessment continues to be viewed critically within literature. The current research explores the understanding of EPs and special educational needs and disability (SEND) officers in this activity, considering the 2014/2015 policy reforms. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in a single Local Authority (LA) using Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) to explore the constructions of each group. Identified contradictions within the data were explored within a Development Work Research (DWR) Lab to create shared actions. Over time, EPs’ practice has remained constant in its recognised strengths, but identified contradictions within historic literature remained evident. Actions moving forward sought to redevelop graduated assessment processes, promote stronger multi-professional working, strengthen annual review processes, and create effective methods for efficient data collection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Psychology in Practice
Educational Psychology in Practice PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信