Jing Mo, Wenbin Wang, Yongyi Wang, Huachun Cheng, Xiaofang Li, Bo Wang
{"title":"MLPA - HRM和rhPCR - HRM快速同时鉴定金银花和金银花","authors":"Jing Mo, Wenbin Wang, Yongyi Wang, Huachun Cheng, Xiaofang Li, Bo Wang","doi":"10.1002/jsf2.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Lonicera Japonicae Flos (LJF) and Lonicerae Flos (LF), derived from different species of <i>Lonicera</i>, are two different types of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) according to their differences in composition and effectiveness. Because of the high price, good effectiveness of the medicinal, and functional values, LJF is often adulterated by LF in the market. Therefore, two single nucleotide polymorphism-based genotyping methods, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification high-resolution melting (MLPA-HRM) and RNase H2-dependant PCR (rhPCR)-HRM, were established for the identification of LF and LJF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Highly specific MLPA probes and rhPCR-primers were designed based on the <i>trnL-trnF</i> regions. The melting temperature (<i>T</i><sub><i>m</i></sub>) of amplicons was derived from the peak of the HRM curve, and the differences in <i>T</i><sub><i>m</i></sub> values were used to identify LJF and LF. The two methods have both shown good specificity for identifying LJF and LF without cross-reaction, and have high sensitivity with the detection limits of 0.1 ng DNA template. For mixed samples, MLPA-HRM could detect LJF mixed with 10% LF while rhPCR-HRM could detect 5% LF in mixed samples. The MLPA-HRM and rhPCR-HRM were performed on DNA extracted from 54 samples of LJF and LF randomly selected from the medicinal material market, all samples were successfully identified and further verified with DNA barcoding.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>MLPA-HRM and rhPCR-HRM methods developed in our study not only provided fast, simple, sensitive, and practical identification of LJF and LF, but also provided technical references for the adulteration identification of other herb-medicines, they are of great significance to the quality control and safe use of plant medicinal materials.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93795,"journal":{"name":"JSFA reports","volume":"3 7","pages":"331-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid and simultaneous identification of Lonicera Japonicae Flos and Lonicerae Flos using MLPA-HRM and rhPCR-HRM\",\"authors\":\"Jing Mo, Wenbin Wang, Yongyi Wang, Huachun Cheng, Xiaofang Li, Bo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jsf2.136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Lonicera Japonicae Flos (LJF) and Lonicerae Flos (LF), derived from different species of <i>Lonicera</i>, are two different types of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) according to their differences in composition and effectiveness. Because of the high price, good effectiveness of the medicinal, and functional values, LJF is often adulterated by LF in the market. Therefore, two single nucleotide polymorphism-based genotyping methods, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification high-resolution melting (MLPA-HRM) and RNase H2-dependant PCR (rhPCR)-HRM, were established for the identification of LF and LJF.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Highly specific MLPA probes and rhPCR-primers were designed based on the <i>trnL-trnF</i> regions. The melting temperature (<i>T</i><sub><i>m</i></sub>) of amplicons was derived from the peak of the HRM curve, and the differences in <i>T</i><sub><i>m</i></sub> values were used to identify LJF and LF. The two methods have both shown good specificity for identifying LJF and LF without cross-reaction, and have high sensitivity with the detection limits of 0.1 ng DNA template. For mixed samples, MLPA-HRM could detect LJF mixed with 10% LF while rhPCR-HRM could detect 5% LF in mixed samples. The MLPA-HRM and rhPCR-HRM were performed on DNA extracted from 54 samples of LJF and LF randomly selected from the medicinal material market, all samples were successfully identified and further verified with DNA barcoding.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>MLPA-HRM and rhPCR-HRM methods developed in our study not only provided fast, simple, sensitive, and practical identification of LJF and LF, but also provided technical references for the adulteration identification of other herb-medicines, they are of great significance to the quality control and safe use of plant medicinal materials.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSFA reports\",\"volume\":\"3 7\",\"pages\":\"331-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSFA reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsf2.136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSFA reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsf2.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rapid and simultaneous identification of Lonicera Japonicae Flos and Lonicerae Flos using MLPA-HRM and rhPCR-HRM
Background
Lonicera Japonicae Flos (LJF) and Lonicerae Flos (LF), derived from different species of Lonicera, are two different types of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) according to their differences in composition and effectiveness. Because of the high price, good effectiveness of the medicinal, and functional values, LJF is often adulterated by LF in the market. Therefore, two single nucleotide polymorphism-based genotyping methods, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification high-resolution melting (MLPA-HRM) and RNase H2-dependant PCR (rhPCR)-HRM, were established for the identification of LF and LJF.
Results
Highly specific MLPA probes and rhPCR-primers were designed based on the trnL-trnF regions. The melting temperature (Tm) of amplicons was derived from the peak of the HRM curve, and the differences in Tm values were used to identify LJF and LF. The two methods have both shown good specificity for identifying LJF and LF without cross-reaction, and have high sensitivity with the detection limits of 0.1 ng DNA template. For mixed samples, MLPA-HRM could detect LJF mixed with 10% LF while rhPCR-HRM could detect 5% LF in mixed samples. The MLPA-HRM and rhPCR-HRM were performed on DNA extracted from 54 samples of LJF and LF randomly selected from the medicinal material market, all samples were successfully identified and further verified with DNA barcoding.
Conclusion
MLPA-HRM and rhPCR-HRM methods developed in our study not only provided fast, simple, sensitive, and practical identification of LJF and LF, but also provided technical references for the adulteration identification of other herb-medicines, they are of great significance to the quality control and safe use of plant medicinal materials.