汇率不确定性下的产能预留和采购

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Shahryar Gheibi, Burak Kazaz, Scott Webster
{"title":"汇率不确定性下的产能预留和采购","authors":"Shahryar Gheibi,&nbsp;Burak Kazaz,&nbsp;Scott Webster","doi":"10.1111/deci.12541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We study a firm's capacity reservation and sourcing decisions under exchange-rate and demand uncertainty. The firm initially reserves capacity from one domestic and one international supplier in the presence of exchange-rate and demand uncertainty. After observing exchange rates, the firm determines the amount of capacity to utilize for sourcing under demand uncertainty. The article makes four contributions. First, it identifies the set of optimal capacity reservation policies for sourcing activities: One onshore, two offshore, and two dual sourcing policies. The first dual sourcing policy is a defensive action where the firm rations limited capacity between the two sources. The second dual sourcing policy is an opportunistic approach as it features excess capacity investment in order to benefit from currency fluctuations. The analysis shows how the optimal sourcing policy changes with increasing degrees of exchange-rate volatility. Second, while earlier publications classify cost as an order qualifier, we find that characterization of a dominant sourcing strategy is more nuanced under exchange rate uncertainty. In particular, a buyer might not reserve capacity at a supplier who has a lower (expected) cost and choose to work only with a supplier who has a higher unit expected cost. Third, the article shows that risk aversion reduces the likelihood of single sourcing, specifically offshore sourcing, and increases the likelihood of dual sourcing. Fourth, the study demonstrates that financial hedging can eliminate the negative consequences of risk aversion and make the policy findings more pronounced.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"54 3","pages":"257-276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/deci.12541","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capacity reservation and sourcing under exchange-rate uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Shahryar Gheibi,&nbsp;Burak Kazaz,&nbsp;Scott Webster\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/deci.12541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We study a firm's capacity reservation and sourcing decisions under exchange-rate and demand uncertainty. The firm initially reserves capacity from one domestic and one international supplier in the presence of exchange-rate and demand uncertainty. After observing exchange rates, the firm determines the amount of capacity to utilize for sourcing under demand uncertainty. The article makes four contributions. First, it identifies the set of optimal capacity reservation policies for sourcing activities: One onshore, two offshore, and two dual sourcing policies. The first dual sourcing policy is a defensive action where the firm rations limited capacity between the two sources. The second dual sourcing policy is an opportunistic approach as it features excess capacity investment in order to benefit from currency fluctuations. The analysis shows how the optimal sourcing policy changes with increasing degrees of exchange-rate volatility. Second, while earlier publications classify cost as an order qualifier, we find that characterization of a dominant sourcing strategy is more nuanced under exchange rate uncertainty. In particular, a buyer might not reserve capacity at a supplier who has a lower (expected) cost and choose to work only with a supplier who has a higher unit expected cost. Third, the article shows that risk aversion reduces the likelihood of single sourcing, specifically offshore sourcing, and increases the likelihood of dual sourcing. Fourth, the study demonstrates that financial hedging can eliminate the negative consequences of risk aversion and make the policy findings more pronounced.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DECISION SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"257-276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/deci.12541\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DECISION SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12541\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文研究了汇率和需求不确定性下企业的产能保留和采购决策。在存在汇率和需求不确定性的情况下,公司最初从一个国内供应商和一个国际供应商处储备产能。在观察汇率之后,公司决定在需求不确定的情况下用于采购的产能。本文做出了四个贡献。首先,它确定了采购活动的一组最佳容量保留策略:一个在岸、两个离岸和两个双重采购策略。第一种双源政策是一种防御行动,公司在两个源之间分配有限的产能。第二种双重采购政策是一种机会主义做法,因为它以产能过剩投资为特点,以便从货币波动中获益。分析显示了最优采购政策如何随着汇率波动程度的增加而变化。其次,虽然早期的出版物将成本分类为订单限定条件,但我们发现在汇率不确定性下,主导采购策略的特征更加微妙。特别是,买方可能不会在具有较低(预期)成本的供应商处保留产能,而选择只与具有较高单位预期成本的供应商合作。第三,风险规避降低了单一采购的可能性,特别是离岸采购,并增加了双重采购的可能性。第四,研究表明,金融套期保值可以消除风险规避的负面影响,使政策发现更加明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capacity reservation and sourcing under exchange-rate uncertainty

We study a firm's capacity reservation and sourcing decisions under exchange-rate and demand uncertainty. The firm initially reserves capacity from one domestic and one international supplier in the presence of exchange-rate and demand uncertainty. After observing exchange rates, the firm determines the amount of capacity to utilize for sourcing under demand uncertainty. The article makes four contributions. First, it identifies the set of optimal capacity reservation policies for sourcing activities: One onshore, two offshore, and two dual sourcing policies. The first dual sourcing policy is a defensive action where the firm rations limited capacity between the two sources. The second dual sourcing policy is an opportunistic approach as it features excess capacity investment in order to benefit from currency fluctuations. The analysis shows how the optimal sourcing policy changes with increasing degrees of exchange-rate volatility. Second, while earlier publications classify cost as an order qualifier, we find that characterization of a dominant sourcing strategy is more nuanced under exchange rate uncertainty. In particular, a buyer might not reserve capacity at a supplier who has a lower (expected) cost and choose to work only with a supplier who has a higher unit expected cost. Third, the article shows that risk aversion reduces the likelihood of single sourcing, specifically offshore sourcing, and increases the likelihood of dual sourcing. Fourth, the study demonstrates that financial hedging can eliminate the negative consequences of risk aversion and make the policy findings more pronounced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DECISION SCIENCES
DECISION SCIENCES MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信