利益相关者价值和利润混合对合作的影响:你不能既有蛋糕又吃蛋糕

IF 7.5 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Katinka J.P. Quintelier , Marlene Vock
{"title":"利益相关者价值和利润混合对合作的影响:你不能既有蛋糕又吃蛋糕","authors":"Katinka J.P. Quintelier ,&nbsp;Marlene Vock","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2022.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Increasingly, for-profit firms commit to creating value for stakeholders. But what are the consequences of mixing stakeholder value and profit? In this article, we draw on insights into moral psychology to explain that a firm's commitments to stakeholder value and to profit both influence individual stakeholders' cooperation, albeit in opposite directions. We predict that mixed firms – committed to both stakeholder value and profit – are perceived as less other-regarding, and, therefore, elicit less cooperation, than stakeholder-oriented firms – balancing the interests of a broad range of stakeholders. In two series of vignette experiments, we find that this is the case for mixed firms switching between profit and stakeholder value, <em>and</em> for mixed firms simultaneously increasing profit and stakeholder value. By investigating mixed firms, this article expands the descriptive scope of stakeholder theory. By applying knowledge from moral psychology, and experimental methods, this work advances the micro-foundations of stakeholder theory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":"42 2","pages":"Pages 255-265"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322001761/pdfft?md5=35d2d717d808173d3d445c07ac6b4c71&pid=1-s2.0-S0263237322001761-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of mixing stakeholder value and profit on cooperation: You can't have your cake and eat it too\",\"authors\":\"Katinka J.P. Quintelier ,&nbsp;Marlene Vock\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.emj.2022.12.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Increasingly, for-profit firms commit to creating value for stakeholders. But what are the consequences of mixing stakeholder value and profit? In this article, we draw on insights into moral psychology to explain that a firm's commitments to stakeholder value and to profit both influence individual stakeholders' cooperation, albeit in opposite directions. We predict that mixed firms – committed to both stakeholder value and profit – are perceived as less other-regarding, and, therefore, elicit less cooperation, than stakeholder-oriented firms – balancing the interests of a broad range of stakeholders. In two series of vignette experiments, we find that this is the case for mixed firms switching between profit and stakeholder value, <em>and</em> for mixed firms simultaneously increasing profit and stakeholder value. By investigating mixed firms, this article expands the descriptive scope of stakeholder theory. By applying knowledge from moral psychology, and experimental methods, this work advances the micro-foundations of stakeholder theory.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"42 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 255-265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322001761/pdfft?md5=35d2d717d808173d3d445c07ac6b4c71&pid=1-s2.0-S0263237322001761-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322001761\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322001761","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的营利性公司致力于为利益相关者创造价值。但是,将利益相关者的价值和利润混为一谈会产生什么后果呢?在本文中,我们借鉴了道德心理学的观点,解释了企业对利益相关者价值和利润的承诺都会影响个体利益相关者的合作,尽管方向相反。我们预测,与以利益相关者为导向的公司(兼顾广泛利益相关者的利益)相比,混合型公司(同时致力于利益相关者的价值和利润)被认为较少顾及他人,因此,引发的合作也较少。在两个系列的小实验中,我们发现,在利润和利益相关者价值之间切换的混合型企业,以及同时提高利润和利益相关者价值的混合型企业,情况都是如此。通过研究混合企业,本文拓展了利益相关者理论的描述范围。通过应用道德心理学知识和实验方法,这项工作推进了利益相关者理论的微观基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of mixing stakeholder value and profit on cooperation: You can't have your cake and eat it too

Increasingly, for-profit firms commit to creating value for stakeholders. But what are the consequences of mixing stakeholder value and profit? In this article, we draw on insights into moral psychology to explain that a firm's commitments to stakeholder value and to profit both influence individual stakeholders' cooperation, albeit in opposite directions. We predict that mixed firms – committed to both stakeholder value and profit – are perceived as less other-regarding, and, therefore, elicit less cooperation, than stakeholder-oriented firms – balancing the interests of a broad range of stakeholders. In two series of vignette experiments, we find that this is the case for mixed firms switching between profit and stakeholder value, and for mixed firms simultaneously increasing profit and stakeholder value. By investigating mixed firms, this article expands the descriptive scope of stakeholder theory. By applying knowledge from moral psychology, and experimental methods, this work advances the micro-foundations of stakeholder theory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信