将STEM教师专业知识概念化用于ELs教学:主题和学科素养PD对内容知识和实践的初步影响

IF 1.7 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Zenaida Aguirre‐Muñoz, Magdalena Pando
{"title":"将STEM教师专业知识概念化用于ELs教学:主题和学科素养PD对内容知识和实践的初步影响","authors":"Zenaida Aguirre‐Muñoz, Magdalena Pando","doi":"10.1080/15235882.2021.1970654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper advances the conceptualization of STEM teacher professional knowledge reflecting the specialized knowledge needed to support English learner (EL) language development during science and mathematics instruction. What distinguishes this model is the integration of conceptual understanding, a key feature of subject matter knowledge, with disciplinary literacy knowledge (DLK). Several models have been proposed to capture the knowledge, skills, and dispositions of effective teachers. However, few studies have empirically investigated the model’s utility in producing effective EL instruction. Two professional development (PD) approaches were tested. One approach explicitly focused on developing subject matter knowledge and the second approach focused on developing pedagogical knowledge without an explicit attention to subject matter knowledge. Both approaches included PD on DLK. Outcome variables included teacher math and science content knowledge and instructional quality. Findings show overall science content knowledge score increased for both PD approaches, but no significant differences in overall math content knowledge score were found. This pattern suggests that for elementary teachers, prolonged PD can improve teacher science knowledge. Significant increases in instructional quality were found only for teachers who received PD with an explicit focus subject matter. PD focused on pedagogical knowledge did not improve overall teaching quality. Implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46530,"journal":{"name":"Bilingual Research Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"335 - 359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualizing STEM teacher professional knowledge for teaching ELs: Initial impact of subject matter and disciplinary literacy PD on content knowledge and practice\",\"authors\":\"Zenaida Aguirre‐Muñoz, Magdalena Pando\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15235882.2021.1970654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper advances the conceptualization of STEM teacher professional knowledge reflecting the specialized knowledge needed to support English learner (EL) language development during science and mathematics instruction. What distinguishes this model is the integration of conceptual understanding, a key feature of subject matter knowledge, with disciplinary literacy knowledge (DLK). Several models have been proposed to capture the knowledge, skills, and dispositions of effective teachers. However, few studies have empirically investigated the model’s utility in producing effective EL instruction. Two professional development (PD) approaches were tested. One approach explicitly focused on developing subject matter knowledge and the second approach focused on developing pedagogical knowledge without an explicit attention to subject matter knowledge. Both approaches included PD on DLK. Outcome variables included teacher math and science content knowledge and instructional quality. Findings show overall science content knowledge score increased for both PD approaches, but no significant differences in overall math content knowledge score were found. This pattern suggests that for elementary teachers, prolonged PD can improve teacher science knowledge. Significant increases in instructional quality were found only for teachers who received PD with an explicit focus subject matter. PD focused on pedagogical knowledge did not improve overall teaching quality. Implications are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bilingual Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"335 - 359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bilingual Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2021.1970654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingual Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2021.1970654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文提出了STEM教师专业知识的概念,反映了在科学和数学教学中支持英语学习者语言发展所需的专业知识。这种模式的区别在于将概念理解(主题知识的一个关键特征)与学科素养知识(DLK)相结合。已经提出了几个模型来捕捉有效教师的知识、技能和性格。然而,很少有研究对该模型在有效的英语教学中的效用进行实证研究。测试了两种专业发展(PD)方法。一种方法明确地侧重于发展学科知识,另一种方法侧重于发展教学知识,而不明确地关注学科知识。两种方法都包括DLK上的PD。结果变量包括教师的数学和科学内容知识和教学质量。结果显示,两种PD方法的科学知识总分均有所提高,但数学知识总分无显著差异。这一模式表明,对于小学教师来说,延长PD可以提高教师的科学知识。只有接受了明确关注主题的PD的教师,教学质量才有显著提高。注重教学知识的PD并没有提高整体教学质量。讨论了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptualizing STEM teacher professional knowledge for teaching ELs: Initial impact of subject matter and disciplinary literacy PD on content knowledge and practice
ABSTRACT This paper advances the conceptualization of STEM teacher professional knowledge reflecting the specialized knowledge needed to support English learner (EL) language development during science and mathematics instruction. What distinguishes this model is the integration of conceptual understanding, a key feature of subject matter knowledge, with disciplinary literacy knowledge (DLK). Several models have been proposed to capture the knowledge, skills, and dispositions of effective teachers. However, few studies have empirically investigated the model’s utility in producing effective EL instruction. Two professional development (PD) approaches were tested. One approach explicitly focused on developing subject matter knowledge and the second approach focused on developing pedagogical knowledge without an explicit attention to subject matter knowledge. Both approaches included PD on DLK. Outcome variables included teacher math and science content knowledge and instructional quality. Findings show overall science content knowledge score increased for both PD approaches, but no significant differences in overall math content knowledge score were found. This pattern suggests that for elementary teachers, prolonged PD can improve teacher science knowledge. Significant increases in instructional quality were found only for teachers who received PD with an explicit focus subject matter. PD focused on pedagogical knowledge did not improve overall teaching quality. Implications are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Bilingual Research Journal is the National Association for Bilingual Education’s premier scholarly, peer-reviewed research publication. Bilingual Research Journal delivers in-depth coverage of education theory and practice, dealing with bilingual education, bilingualism, and language policies in education. Topics include: -Assessment- Biliteracy- Indigenous languages- Language planning- Language politics- Multilingualism- Pedagogical approaches- Policy analysis- Instructional research- Language planning- Second language acquisition. The journal has a strong interest in matters related to the education of language minority children and youth in the United States, grades PreK-12, but articles focusing on other countries are often included if they have implications for bilingual education in the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信