“学位就是学位”:理解澳大利亚高参与度体系中职业院校的学士学位

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Susan Webb, E. Knight, S. Hodge
{"title":"“学位就是学位”:理解澳大利亚高参与度体系中职业院校的学士学位","authors":"Susan Webb, E. Knight, S. Hodge","doi":"10.1080/14480220.2021.1883839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tertiary sector in Australia is undergoing profound change especially at the intersection between higher education and vocational education, with the role and contribution of vocational education subject to intense debate in this high participation system (Monash Commission, 2018). In this turbulent environment, traditional providers of higher education, such as universities, and vocational education and training colleges are working in new ways to increase access and participation to high skills by developing provision that spans the vocational and higher education divide (Webb et al., 2017). New providers, such as TAFES, are entering and innovating in the field of higher education. However, there is little research that looks at vocational institution provision of bachelor’s degrees and explores what it means for higher education, for vocational education, for equity for students and for preparing people for changing labour markets. In this Special Issue of the International Journal of Training Research, the papers’ authors have all been connected in some way with the Australian Research Council funded Discovery Project (DP170101885) ‘Vocational Institutions, Undergraduate Degrees: Distinction or Inequality’, a three-year national case study investigating every TAFE institution across Australia that had received approval to offer its own bachelor degrees. The project created a space for academics and practitioners to reflect on the nature of vocational and higher education when they came together to explore the practices of a novel form of the long-standing and esteemed bachelor’s degree qualification (Huggins et al., 2003). In Australia, following the ending of the National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) competitive grants scheme and the National VET Equity Advisory Council (NVEAC) grants system, the last ten years have seen a dearth of original, competitive, uncontracted research in Australia about vocational education. To our knowledge, the research discussed in this special issue has been derived from one of a very small number of ARC Discovery Projects which has had a vocational education focus and, it was only the second Australian Research Council funded project focusing explicitly on vocational education provision and institutions after Professor Erica Smith’s Linkage project (ARC – LP140100044) alongside this Journal’s editor Roger Harris and other colleagues. The wider context for this issue is that the education field in Australia has had a longstanding minor position in terms of the award of research funding (Graham & Buckley, 2014). Moreover, in recent years there have been further falls in the success of education as a broader discipline in the competitive Australian Research Council funding schemes (Sullivan & Tippett, 2020). Over the last decade there has been a 5% success rate for projects with the field of research 13 (Education) compared to the average for all FoR INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRAINING RESEARCH 2020, VOL. 18, NO. 2, 93–100 https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1883839","PeriodicalId":56351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Training Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"93 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14480220.2021.1883839","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘A degree is a degree’: understanding vocational institution’s bachelor degrees in Australia’s high participation system\",\"authors\":\"Susan Webb, E. Knight, S. Hodge\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14480220.2021.1883839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The tertiary sector in Australia is undergoing profound change especially at the intersection between higher education and vocational education, with the role and contribution of vocational education subject to intense debate in this high participation system (Monash Commission, 2018). In this turbulent environment, traditional providers of higher education, such as universities, and vocational education and training colleges are working in new ways to increase access and participation to high skills by developing provision that spans the vocational and higher education divide (Webb et al., 2017). New providers, such as TAFES, are entering and innovating in the field of higher education. However, there is little research that looks at vocational institution provision of bachelor’s degrees and explores what it means for higher education, for vocational education, for equity for students and for preparing people for changing labour markets. In this Special Issue of the International Journal of Training Research, the papers’ authors have all been connected in some way with the Australian Research Council funded Discovery Project (DP170101885) ‘Vocational Institutions, Undergraduate Degrees: Distinction or Inequality’, a three-year national case study investigating every TAFE institution across Australia that had received approval to offer its own bachelor degrees. The project created a space for academics and practitioners to reflect on the nature of vocational and higher education when they came together to explore the practices of a novel form of the long-standing and esteemed bachelor’s degree qualification (Huggins et al., 2003). In Australia, following the ending of the National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) competitive grants scheme and the National VET Equity Advisory Council (NVEAC) grants system, the last ten years have seen a dearth of original, competitive, uncontracted research in Australia about vocational education. To our knowledge, the research discussed in this special issue has been derived from one of a very small number of ARC Discovery Projects which has had a vocational education focus and, it was only the second Australian Research Council funded project focusing explicitly on vocational education provision and institutions after Professor Erica Smith’s Linkage project (ARC – LP140100044) alongside this Journal’s editor Roger Harris and other colleagues. The wider context for this issue is that the education field in Australia has had a longstanding minor position in terms of the award of research funding (Graham & Buckley, 2014). Moreover, in recent years there have been further falls in the success of education as a broader discipline in the competitive Australian Research Council funding schemes (Sullivan & Tippett, 2020). Over the last decade there has been a 5% success rate for projects with the field of research 13 (Education) compared to the average for all FoR INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRAINING RESEARCH 2020, VOL. 18, NO. 2, 93–100 https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1883839\",\"PeriodicalId\":56351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Training Research\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"93 - 100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14480220.2021.1883839\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Training Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1883839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Training Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1883839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

澳大利亚的第三产业正在发生深刻的变化,特别是在高等教育和职业教育的交叉点,职业教育的作用和贡献在这个高参与度的系统中受到激烈的争论(莫纳什委员会,2018)。在这种动荡的环境中,传统的高等教育提供者,如大学、职业教育和培训学院,正在以新的方式开展工作,通过制定跨越职业和高等教育鸿沟的规定,增加高技能的获取和参与(Webb等人,2017)。新的提供者,如tafe,正在进入和创新高等教育领域。然而,很少有研究关注职业院校提供的学士学位,并探讨它对高等教育、职业教育、学生公平以及为不断变化的劳动力市场做好准备意味着什么。在本期《国际培训研究杂志》的特刊中,论文的作者都以某种方式与澳大利亚研究委员会资助的发现项目(DP170101885)“职业院校,本科学位:区别或不平等”联系在一起,这是一个为期三年的国家案例研究,调查了澳大利亚所有获得批准提供自己学士学位的TAFE机构。该项目为学者和从业者创造了一个空间,让他们在一起探索一种长期存在且受人尊敬的新形式的学士学位资格的实践时,反思职业和高等教育的本质(Huggins et al., 2003)。在澳大利亚,随着国家职业教育研究中心(NCVER)竞争性拨款计划和国家职业教育公平咨询委员会(NVEAC)拨款制度的结束,过去十年来,澳大利亚缺乏关于职业教育的原创、竞争性、非合同研究。据我们所知,本期特刊中讨论的研究来自于为数不多的以职业教育为重点的ARC发现项目之一,这是继Erica Smith教授的联动项目(ARC - LP140100044)以及本刊编辑Roger Harris和其他同事之后,澳大利亚研究委员会资助的第二个明确关注职业教育提供和机构的项目。这个问题的更广泛的背景是,澳大利亚的教育领域在研究经费的奖励方面长期处于次要地位(Graham & Buckley, 2014)。此外,近年来,在竞争激烈的澳大利亚研究委员会资助计划中,教育作为一门更广泛的学科的成功率进一步下降(Sullivan & Tippett, 2020)。在过去十年中,与所有研究领域(教育)的平均成功率相比,研究领域13的项目成功率为5%。国际培训研究杂志2020,VOL. 18, NO. 5。2,93 - 100 https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1883839
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘A degree is a degree’: understanding vocational institution’s bachelor degrees in Australia’s high participation system
The tertiary sector in Australia is undergoing profound change especially at the intersection between higher education and vocational education, with the role and contribution of vocational education subject to intense debate in this high participation system (Monash Commission, 2018). In this turbulent environment, traditional providers of higher education, such as universities, and vocational education and training colleges are working in new ways to increase access and participation to high skills by developing provision that spans the vocational and higher education divide (Webb et al., 2017). New providers, such as TAFES, are entering and innovating in the field of higher education. However, there is little research that looks at vocational institution provision of bachelor’s degrees and explores what it means for higher education, for vocational education, for equity for students and for preparing people for changing labour markets. In this Special Issue of the International Journal of Training Research, the papers’ authors have all been connected in some way with the Australian Research Council funded Discovery Project (DP170101885) ‘Vocational Institutions, Undergraduate Degrees: Distinction or Inequality’, a three-year national case study investigating every TAFE institution across Australia that had received approval to offer its own bachelor degrees. The project created a space for academics and practitioners to reflect on the nature of vocational and higher education when they came together to explore the practices of a novel form of the long-standing and esteemed bachelor’s degree qualification (Huggins et al., 2003). In Australia, following the ending of the National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) competitive grants scheme and the National VET Equity Advisory Council (NVEAC) grants system, the last ten years have seen a dearth of original, competitive, uncontracted research in Australia about vocational education. To our knowledge, the research discussed in this special issue has been derived from one of a very small number of ARC Discovery Projects which has had a vocational education focus and, it was only the second Australian Research Council funded project focusing explicitly on vocational education provision and institutions after Professor Erica Smith’s Linkage project (ARC – LP140100044) alongside this Journal’s editor Roger Harris and other colleagues. The wider context for this issue is that the education field in Australia has had a longstanding minor position in terms of the award of research funding (Graham & Buckley, 2014). Moreover, in recent years there have been further falls in the success of education as a broader discipline in the competitive Australian Research Council funding schemes (Sullivan & Tippett, 2020). Over the last decade there has been a 5% success rate for projects with the field of research 13 (Education) compared to the average for all FoR INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRAINING RESEARCH 2020, VOL. 18, NO. 2, 93–100 https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1883839
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Training Research
International Journal of Training Research EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信