美国家长对儿童自闭症专业人士媒体指导的看法

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
M. Alper
{"title":"美国家长对儿童自闭症专业人士媒体指导的看法","authors":"M. Alper","doi":"10.1080/17482798.2020.1736111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Screen media guidelines for children set by medical organizations (e.g., the American Academy of Pediatrics) play a significant role in public discourse regarding media and parenting. Physician mediation theory, an adaptation of parental mediation theory, suggests that physician-patient discussion about media content (e.g., online searches) directly shapes patient engagement with said content. Little attention has been paid though as to how guidance about children’s media use is delivered to parents by pediatric clinical professionals and its utility from the perspective of diverse families. Interviews and home observations were conducted with families of 26 children ages 3–13 on the autism spectrum. Two main social contexts for media guidance were identified: advising on children’s media use 1) as part of therapy and 2) as recreation. Prior research indicates that physician mediation takes three forms: positive (encouraging media use), negative (discouraging), and redirective (suggesting alternatives). Within the two contexts, positive physician mediation was more prominent in therapeutic than recreational contexts. Poor and working-class families also tended to report media guidance less than upper- and middle-class families, partly due to barriers in accessing clinical care. Implications are discussed for improving physician mediation theory as well as enhancing caregiver-clinician communication about children’s media use.","PeriodicalId":46908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children and Media","volume":"15 1","pages":"165 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17482798.2020.1736111","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"U.S. parent perspectives on media guidance from pediatric autism professionals\",\"authors\":\"M. Alper\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17482798.2020.1736111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Screen media guidelines for children set by medical organizations (e.g., the American Academy of Pediatrics) play a significant role in public discourse regarding media and parenting. Physician mediation theory, an adaptation of parental mediation theory, suggests that physician-patient discussion about media content (e.g., online searches) directly shapes patient engagement with said content. Little attention has been paid though as to how guidance about children’s media use is delivered to parents by pediatric clinical professionals and its utility from the perspective of diverse families. Interviews and home observations were conducted with families of 26 children ages 3–13 on the autism spectrum. Two main social contexts for media guidance were identified: advising on children’s media use 1) as part of therapy and 2) as recreation. Prior research indicates that physician mediation takes three forms: positive (encouraging media use), negative (discouraging), and redirective (suggesting alternatives). Within the two contexts, positive physician mediation was more prominent in therapeutic than recreational contexts. Poor and working-class families also tended to report media guidance less than upper- and middle-class families, partly due to barriers in accessing clinical care. Implications are discussed for improving physician mediation theory as well as enhancing caregiver-clinician communication about children’s media use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Children and Media\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"165 - 182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17482798.2020.1736111\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Children and Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1736111\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children and Media","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1736111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

由医疗机构(如美国儿科学会)制定的儿童屏幕媒体指南在有关媒体和育儿的公共话语中发挥着重要作用。医生调解理论是对父母调解理论的一种改编,它认为医患之间关于媒体内容(例如,在线搜索)的讨论直接影响了患者对所述内容的参与。然而,很少有人关注儿科临床专业人员如何向家长提供有关儿童媒体使用的指导,以及从不同家庭的角度来看其效用。对26个年龄在3-13岁的自闭症儿童的家庭进行了访谈和家庭观察。媒体指导的两个主要社会背景被确定:对儿童媒体使用的建议:1)作为治疗的一部分,2)作为娱乐。先前的研究表明,医生调解有三种形式:积极的(鼓励媒体使用),消极的(劝阻)和重新指导(建议替代方案)。在这两种情境中,积极的医生调解在治疗情境中比在娱乐情境中更为突出。贫困和工薪阶层家庭也倾向于比中上层家庭更少地报告媒体指导,部分原因是在获得临床护理方面存在障碍。本研究对改善医师调解理论及加强护理人员与临床医师在儿童媒体使用方面的沟通具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
U.S. parent perspectives on media guidance from pediatric autism professionals
ABSTRACT Screen media guidelines for children set by medical organizations (e.g., the American Academy of Pediatrics) play a significant role in public discourse regarding media and parenting. Physician mediation theory, an adaptation of parental mediation theory, suggests that physician-patient discussion about media content (e.g., online searches) directly shapes patient engagement with said content. Little attention has been paid though as to how guidance about children’s media use is delivered to parents by pediatric clinical professionals and its utility from the perspective of diverse families. Interviews and home observations were conducted with families of 26 children ages 3–13 on the autism spectrum. Two main social contexts for media guidance were identified: advising on children’s media use 1) as part of therapy and 2) as recreation. Prior research indicates that physician mediation takes three forms: positive (encouraging media use), negative (discouraging), and redirective (suggesting alternatives). Within the two contexts, positive physician mediation was more prominent in therapeutic than recreational contexts. Poor and working-class families also tended to report media guidance less than upper- and middle-class families, partly due to barriers in accessing clinical care. Implications are discussed for improving physician mediation theory as well as enhancing caregiver-clinician communication about children’s media use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信