通过STEM和STEAM教育认识自然美学

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Basaran, M. Erol
{"title":"通过STEM和STEAM教育认识自然美学","authors":"M. Basaran, M. Erol","doi":"10.1080/02635143.2021.1908248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background In the study conducted with primary school students, the differences between STEM and STEAM activities and environmental awareness and environmental aesthetics were examined. Purpose This study aims to examine the effects of traditional methods, STEM, and STEAM-based activities on primary school fourth-grade students’ environmental awareness. Besides, the extent to which an aesthetic view predicts environmental awareness was also examined. Sample In the study, practices were carried out on six fourth grade classes located in the state primary schools in Başakşehir district of Istanbul province, which were selected using the random cluster sampling method. Design and methods In the study, a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group was used. At the end of the applications, the Environmental Awareness Scale and the Aesthetic View Scale developed by the researchers were applied to the students. As a result of the research, it has been observed that STEM and STEAM-based applications are effective in gaining both environmental awareness and aesthetic perspective, but the traditional method is effective in gaining environmental awareness, but not in gaining an aesthetic view. Results According to ANOVA results to determine which application is more effective in gaining environmental awareness and aesthetic perspective, STEM applications are more effective than traditional applications, and STEAM applications are more effective than both traditional and STEM applications. In the regression analysis, it was seen that the aesthetic view explained 22% of the variation in environmental awareness. Conclusions According to the results of the study, conveying only environmental knowledge to the students in environmental education may be insufficient to reach the intended goal. To raise environmentally sensitive students, it can be said that in environmental education, attention should be paid to gaining affective behaviours and giving students an aesthetic view and cognitive behaviour.","PeriodicalId":46656,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science & Technological Education","volume":"41 1","pages":"326 - 342"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02635143.2021.1908248","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognizing aesthetics in nature with STEM and STEAM education\",\"authors\":\"M. Basaran, M. Erol\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02635143.2021.1908248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background In the study conducted with primary school students, the differences between STEM and STEAM activities and environmental awareness and environmental aesthetics were examined. Purpose This study aims to examine the effects of traditional methods, STEM, and STEAM-based activities on primary school fourth-grade students’ environmental awareness. Besides, the extent to which an aesthetic view predicts environmental awareness was also examined. Sample In the study, practices were carried out on six fourth grade classes located in the state primary schools in Başakşehir district of Istanbul province, which were selected using the random cluster sampling method. Design and methods In the study, a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group was used. At the end of the applications, the Environmental Awareness Scale and the Aesthetic View Scale developed by the researchers were applied to the students. As a result of the research, it has been observed that STEM and STEAM-based applications are effective in gaining both environmental awareness and aesthetic perspective, but the traditional method is effective in gaining environmental awareness, but not in gaining an aesthetic view. Results According to ANOVA results to determine which application is more effective in gaining environmental awareness and aesthetic perspective, STEM applications are more effective than traditional applications, and STEAM applications are more effective than both traditional and STEM applications. In the regression analysis, it was seen that the aesthetic view explained 22% of the variation in environmental awareness. Conclusions According to the results of the study, conveying only environmental knowledge to the students in environmental education may be insufficient to reach the intended goal. To raise environmentally sensitive students, it can be said that in environmental education, attention should be paid to gaining affective behaviours and giving students an aesthetic view and cognitive behaviour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Science & Technological Education\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"326 - 342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02635143.2021.1908248\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Science & Technological Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1908248\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science & Technological Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1908248","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要背景在对小学生进行的研究中,考察了STEM和STEAM活动与环境意识和环境美学之间的差异。目的本研究旨在检验传统方法、STEM和基于STEAM的活动对小学四年级学生环境意识的影响。此外,还考察了美学观点对环境意识的预测程度。样本在这项研究中,对伊斯坦布尔省巴沙克希尔区公立小学的六个四年级班级进行了实践,这些班级是使用随机整群抽样方法选出的。设计和方法本研究采用准实验设计,前测后测对照组。在应用的最后,将研究人员开发的环境意识量表和审美观量表应用于学生。研究结果表明,基于STEM和STEAM的应用能够有效地获得环境意识和美学视角,但传统方法能够有效地获取环境意识,但不能获得美学视角。结果根据方差分析结果,确定哪种应用程序在获得环境意识和美学观点方面更有效,STEM应用程序比传统应用程序更有效,而STEAM应用程序比常规和STEM应用都更有效。在回归分析中,可以看出美学观点解释了22%的环境意识变化。结论根据研究结果,在环境教育中仅向学生传达环境知识可能不足以达到预期目标。要培养对环境敏感的学生,可以说在环境教育中应该注意获得情感行为,给予学生审美观和认知行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recognizing aesthetics in nature with STEM and STEAM education
ABSTRACT Background In the study conducted with primary school students, the differences between STEM and STEAM activities and environmental awareness and environmental aesthetics were examined. Purpose This study aims to examine the effects of traditional methods, STEM, and STEAM-based activities on primary school fourth-grade students’ environmental awareness. Besides, the extent to which an aesthetic view predicts environmental awareness was also examined. Sample In the study, practices were carried out on six fourth grade classes located in the state primary schools in Başakşehir district of Istanbul province, which were selected using the random cluster sampling method. Design and methods In the study, a quasi-experimental design with a pretest-posttest control group was used. At the end of the applications, the Environmental Awareness Scale and the Aesthetic View Scale developed by the researchers were applied to the students. As a result of the research, it has been observed that STEM and STEAM-based applications are effective in gaining both environmental awareness and aesthetic perspective, but the traditional method is effective in gaining environmental awareness, but not in gaining an aesthetic view. Results According to ANOVA results to determine which application is more effective in gaining environmental awareness and aesthetic perspective, STEM applications are more effective than traditional applications, and STEAM applications are more effective than both traditional and STEM applications. In the regression analysis, it was seen that the aesthetic view explained 22% of the variation in environmental awareness. Conclusions According to the results of the study, conveying only environmental knowledge to the students in environmental education may be insufficient to reach the intended goal. To raise environmentally sensitive students, it can be said that in environmental education, attention should be paid to gaining affective behaviours and giving students an aesthetic view and cognitive behaviour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Science & Technological Education
Research in Science & Technological Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信