韩国教师对有残疾风险学生的识别和干预的看法

IF 0.6 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Woori Kim, Jiyeon Kim, Sylvia Linan-Thompson
{"title":"韩国教师对有残疾风险学生的识别和干预的看法","authors":"Woori Kim, Jiyeon Kim, Sylvia Linan-Thompson","doi":"10.1080/09362835.2020.1772066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study investigated teachers’ experiences and perspectives on the identification of and educational support for students at risk for disabilities. Three focus groups with general education teachers and four with special education teachers were conducted. The interview data were analyzed using grounded theory methodology. The results, based on axial coding, revealed the core phenomenon to be the cycle of referral, identification, and intervention. The contextual conditions that sustained the cycle were: (a) parental denial, (b) families with low SES or vulnerability, (c) the negative effects of labeling, (d) general education teachers’ workload, (e) ambiguity of special education teachers’ role, and (f) poor collaboration between general and special education teachers. The key factors required to switch to the positive cycle were teachers’ responsibility and competence. The action strategies to facilitate the identification and intervention processes were summarized as implementation of: (a) valid and reliable identification procedures, (b) schoolwide preventative intervention system, and (c) comprehensive family support.","PeriodicalId":46668,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality","volume":"29 1","pages":"359 - 374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2020.1772066","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers’ Perspectives on the Identification of and Intervention for Students at Risk for Disabilities in South Korea\",\"authors\":\"Woori Kim, Jiyeon Kim, Sylvia Linan-Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09362835.2020.1772066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study investigated teachers’ experiences and perspectives on the identification of and educational support for students at risk for disabilities. Three focus groups with general education teachers and four with special education teachers were conducted. The interview data were analyzed using grounded theory methodology. The results, based on axial coding, revealed the core phenomenon to be the cycle of referral, identification, and intervention. The contextual conditions that sustained the cycle were: (a) parental denial, (b) families with low SES or vulnerability, (c) the negative effects of labeling, (d) general education teachers’ workload, (e) ambiguity of special education teachers’ role, and (f) poor collaboration between general and special education teachers. The key factors required to switch to the positive cycle were teachers’ responsibility and competence. The action strategies to facilitate the identification and intervention processes were summarized as implementation of: (a) valid and reliable identification procedures, (b) schoolwide preventative intervention system, and (c) comprehensive family support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exceptionality\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"359 - 374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2020.1772066\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exceptionality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1772066\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1772066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究调查了教师在残疾风险学生的识别和教育支持方面的经验和观点。进行了三个普通教育教师焦点小组和四个特殊教育教师焦点小组。访谈数据采用扎根理论方法进行分析。结果,基于轴向编码,揭示了核心现象是转诊,识别和干预的循环。维持这一循环的环境条件是:(a)父母的拒绝,(b)低社会经济地位或脆弱的家庭,(c)标签的负面影响,(d)普通教育教师的工作量,(e)特殊教育教师角色的模糊性,以及(f)普通教育教师和特殊教育教师之间的合作不足。教师的责任心和能力是实现良性循环的关键因素。促进识别和干预过程的行动策略总结为:(a)有效和可靠的识别程序,(b)全校预防性干预系统,以及(c)全面的家庭支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teachers’ Perspectives on the Identification of and Intervention for Students at Risk for Disabilities in South Korea
ABSTRACT This study investigated teachers’ experiences and perspectives on the identification of and educational support for students at risk for disabilities. Three focus groups with general education teachers and four with special education teachers were conducted. The interview data were analyzed using grounded theory methodology. The results, based on axial coding, revealed the core phenomenon to be the cycle of referral, identification, and intervention. The contextual conditions that sustained the cycle were: (a) parental denial, (b) families with low SES or vulnerability, (c) the negative effects of labeling, (d) general education teachers’ workload, (e) ambiguity of special education teachers’ role, and (f) poor collaboration between general and special education teachers. The key factors required to switch to the positive cycle were teachers’ responsibility and competence. The action strategies to facilitate the identification and intervention processes were summarized as implementation of: (a) valid and reliable identification procedures, (b) schoolwide preventative intervention system, and (c) comprehensive family support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Exceptionality
Exceptionality EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信