获得反馈接受:领导成员依恋类型与心理安全

IF 8.2 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Manuel London , Judith Volmer , Jetmir Zyberaj , Avraham N. Kluger
{"title":"获得反馈接受:领导成员依恋类型与心理安全","authors":"Manuel London ,&nbsp;Judith Volmer ,&nbsp;Jetmir Zyberaj ,&nbsp;Avraham N. Kluger","doi":"10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This conceptual article develops a model of how attachment style affects how leaders give feedback and members' react to it. Drawing on attachment theory, we propose that leaders whose trait attachment style is grounded in a desire for security are likely to deliver feedback that is constructive—that is, specific, frequent, timely, behavioral, and future-focused expressed in a way that establishes psychological safety. Leaders who have an anxious attachment style do not want to give members unfavorable feedback that may cause a negative reaction. Leaders who avoid attachment are likely to present little feedback or present unfavorable feedback in a manner that is not constructive—potentially blunt and ego-threatening. Our model also predicts that team members' trait attachment style influences their feedback acceptance mediated by their feelings of psychological safety, with secure attachment style members benefiting most from constructive feedback. Further, we consider how the match (or mismatch) in attachment style between the leader and member influences their reactions to each other as the leader offers feedback and the member reacts. This has implications for assessing the fit between the leader's and team member's attachment styles and designing HR interventions for more constructive feedback and positive reactions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48145,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Management Review","volume":"33 2","pages":"Article 100953"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gaining feedback acceptance: Leader-member attachment style and psychological safety\",\"authors\":\"Manuel London ,&nbsp;Judith Volmer ,&nbsp;Jetmir Zyberaj ,&nbsp;Avraham N. Kluger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This conceptual article develops a model of how attachment style affects how leaders give feedback and members' react to it. Drawing on attachment theory, we propose that leaders whose trait attachment style is grounded in a desire for security are likely to deliver feedback that is constructive—that is, specific, frequent, timely, behavioral, and future-focused expressed in a way that establishes psychological safety. Leaders who have an anxious attachment style do not want to give members unfavorable feedback that may cause a negative reaction. Leaders who avoid attachment are likely to present little feedback or present unfavorable feedback in a manner that is not constructive—potentially blunt and ego-threatening. Our model also predicts that team members' trait attachment style influences their feedback acceptance mediated by their feelings of psychological safety, with secure attachment style members benefiting most from constructive feedback. Further, we consider how the match (or mismatch) in attachment style between the leader and member influences their reactions to each other as the leader offers feedback and the member reacts. This has implications for assessing the fit between the leader's and team member's attachment styles and designing HR interventions for more constructive feedback and positive reactions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Resource Management Review\",\"volume\":\"33 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100953\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Resource Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053482223000013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053482223000013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇概念性的文章发展了一个依恋类型如何影响领导者给予反馈和成员对反馈的反应的模型。根据依恋理论,我们提出,依恋类型建立在对安全的渴望基础上的领导者可能会提供建设性的反馈——也就是说,以一种建立心理安全的方式表达的具体、频繁、及时、行为性和面向未来的反馈。拥有焦虑型依恋类型的领导者不希望给成员不利的反馈,这可能会引起消极的反应。避免依恋的领导者可能很少给出反馈,或者以一种没有建设性的方式给出不利的反馈——潜在的直率和自我威胁。我们的模型还预测了团队成员特质依恋类型影响其心理安全感介导的反馈接受程度,其中安全型依恋类型成员从建设性反馈中获益最多。此外,我们考虑了领导者和成员在依恋风格上的匹配(或不匹配)如何影响他们对彼此的反应,因为领导者提供反馈,成员做出反应。这对评估领导者和团队成员的依恋风格之间的契合度以及设计人力资源干预措施以获得更具建设性的反馈和积极的反应具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gaining feedback acceptance: Leader-member attachment style and psychological safety

This conceptual article develops a model of how attachment style affects how leaders give feedback and members' react to it. Drawing on attachment theory, we propose that leaders whose trait attachment style is grounded in a desire for security are likely to deliver feedback that is constructive—that is, specific, frequent, timely, behavioral, and future-focused expressed in a way that establishes psychological safety. Leaders who have an anxious attachment style do not want to give members unfavorable feedback that may cause a negative reaction. Leaders who avoid attachment are likely to present little feedback or present unfavorable feedback in a manner that is not constructive—potentially blunt and ego-threatening. Our model also predicts that team members' trait attachment style influences their feedback acceptance mediated by their feelings of psychological safety, with secure attachment style members benefiting most from constructive feedback. Further, we consider how the match (or mismatch) in attachment style between the leader and member influences their reactions to each other as the leader offers feedback and the member reacts. This has implications for assessing the fit between the leader's and team member's attachment styles and designing HR interventions for more constructive feedback and positive reactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Human Resource Management Review (HRMR) is a quarterly academic journal dedicated to publishing scholarly conceptual and theoretical articles in the field of human resource management and related disciplines such as industrial/organizational psychology, human capital, labor relations, and organizational behavior. HRMR encourages manuscripts that address micro-, macro-, or multi-level phenomena concerning the function and processes of human resource management. The journal publishes articles that offer fresh insights to inspire future theory development and empirical research. Critical evaluations of existing concepts, theories, models, and frameworks are also encouraged, as well as quantitative meta-analytical reviews that contribute to conceptual and theoretical understanding. Subject areas appropriate for HRMR include (but are not limited to) Strategic Human Resource Management, International Human Resource Management, the nature and role of the human resource function in organizations, any specific Human Resource function or activity (e.g., Job Analysis, Job Design, Workforce Planning, Recruitment, Selection and Placement, Performance and Talent Management, Reward Systems, Training, Development, Careers, Safety and Health, Diversity, Fairness, Discrimination, Employment Law, Employee Relations, Labor Relations, Workforce Metrics, HR Analytics, HRM and Technology, Social issues and HRM, Separation and Retention), topics that influence or are influenced by human resource management activities (e.g., Climate, Culture, Change, Leadership and Power, Groups and Teams, Employee Attitudes and Behavior, Individual, team, and/or Organizational Performance), and HRM Research Methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信