{"title":"使用对比层次将结构相似性形式化为L3语音中的i邻近","authors":"J. Archibald","doi":"10.1075/lab.22051.arc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper I argue that cross-linguistic similarity in third language acquisition is determined by a structural\n hierarchy of contrastive phonological features. Such an approach allows us formalize a predictive notion of I-proximity which also\n provides an explanatory model of L2, and L3 phonological knowledge (represented in an integrated I-grammar). The metrics of\n phonological similarity (i.e., structural not acoustic) are analogous to morphosyntactic similarity in that both morphosyntactic\n and phonological approaches can compare the outcomes of parsing the L3 input by the L1 hierarchy and by the L2 hierarchy. From\n this starting point I propose a conservative, incremental learning theory to guide subsequent reconstruction of the L3 grammar.\n Under this model, it can be argued that phonology is part of Faculty of Language Narrow (FLN). The (gradient) phonetic material\n comes from outside the FLN but the linguistic computational system converts it to discrete abstract elements that can be\n manipulated by the learner.","PeriodicalId":48664,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using a contrastive hierarchy to formalize structural similarity as I-proximity in L3 phonology\",\"authors\":\"J. Archibald\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lab.22051.arc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this paper I argue that cross-linguistic similarity in third language acquisition is determined by a structural\\n hierarchy of contrastive phonological features. Such an approach allows us formalize a predictive notion of I-proximity which also\\n provides an explanatory model of L2, and L3 phonological knowledge (represented in an integrated I-grammar). The metrics of\\n phonological similarity (i.e., structural not acoustic) are analogous to morphosyntactic similarity in that both morphosyntactic\\n and phonological approaches can compare the outcomes of parsing the L3 input by the L1 hierarchy and by the L2 hierarchy. From\\n this starting point I propose a conservative, incremental learning theory to guide subsequent reconstruction of the L3 grammar.\\n Under this model, it can be argued that phonology is part of Faculty of Language Narrow (FLN). The (gradient) phonetic material\\n comes from outside the FLN but the linguistic computational system converts it to discrete abstract elements that can be\\n manipulated by the learner.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22051.arc\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22051.arc","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using a contrastive hierarchy to formalize structural similarity as I-proximity in L3 phonology
In this paper I argue that cross-linguistic similarity in third language acquisition is determined by a structural
hierarchy of contrastive phonological features. Such an approach allows us formalize a predictive notion of I-proximity which also
provides an explanatory model of L2, and L3 phonological knowledge (represented in an integrated I-grammar). The metrics of
phonological similarity (i.e., structural not acoustic) are analogous to morphosyntactic similarity in that both morphosyntactic
and phonological approaches can compare the outcomes of parsing the L3 input by the L1 hierarchy and by the L2 hierarchy. From
this starting point I propose a conservative, incremental learning theory to guide subsequent reconstruction of the L3 grammar.
Under this model, it can be argued that phonology is part of Faculty of Language Narrow (FLN). The (gradient) phonetic material
comes from outside the FLN but the linguistic computational system converts it to discrete abstract elements that can be
manipulated by the learner.
期刊介绍:
LAB provides an outlet for cutting-edge, contemporary studies on bilingualism. LAB assumes a broad definition of bilingualism, including: adult L2 acquisition, simultaneous child bilingualism, child L2 acquisition, adult heritage speaker competence, L1 attrition in L2/Ln environments, and adult L3/Ln acquisition. LAB solicits high quality articles of original research assuming any cognitive science approach to understanding the mental representation of bilingual language competence and performance, including cognitive linguistics, emergentism/connectionism, generative theories, psycholinguistic and processing accounts, and covering typical and atypical populations.