内布拉斯加州视障学生写作教学实践调查

IF 0.6 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Michael A. Hebert, Mackenzie E. Savaiano
{"title":"内布拉斯加州视障学生写作教学实践调查","authors":"Michael A. Hebert, Mackenzie E. Savaiano","doi":"10.1080/09362835.2020.1850450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper describes a survey of teachers of students with visual impairments (TVIs) in Nebraska. Questions addressed their preparation to teach writing, writing practices, and beliefs about writing instruction. Twenty-four of 60 TVIs in Nebraska responded to the survey, and 19 answered all questions. Teachers were split on their preparation to teach writing (50% indicated receiving adequate training), but slightly to moderately agreed that they knew how to use writing to support their students’ needs. The TVIs unanimously agreed that all writing purposes (e.g., for fun, to demonstrate knowledge, for daily living activities) are appropriate for students who are functionally blind, students who have low vision, and students with multiple disabilities or deaf-blindness. However, they were split on whether writing instruction was their responsibility (47.8% agreed, 52.2% disagreed) and varied in the use of writing practices across different groups of students (e.g., 74% of TVIs felt writing to inform was appropriate for students who are functionally blind, whereas only 42% and 11% felt this was appropriate for students with low vision and multiple-disabilities, respectively). The implications of this study are limited due to the small number of participants, but the results represent 40% of the total number of Nebraska TVIs.","PeriodicalId":46668,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality","volume":"29 1","pages":"294 - 309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2020.1850450","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A survey of the writing instructional practices of Nebraska teachers of students with visual impairments\",\"authors\":\"Michael A. Hebert, Mackenzie E. Savaiano\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09362835.2020.1850450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper describes a survey of teachers of students with visual impairments (TVIs) in Nebraska. Questions addressed their preparation to teach writing, writing practices, and beliefs about writing instruction. Twenty-four of 60 TVIs in Nebraska responded to the survey, and 19 answered all questions. Teachers were split on their preparation to teach writing (50% indicated receiving adequate training), but slightly to moderately agreed that they knew how to use writing to support their students’ needs. The TVIs unanimously agreed that all writing purposes (e.g., for fun, to demonstrate knowledge, for daily living activities) are appropriate for students who are functionally blind, students who have low vision, and students with multiple disabilities or deaf-blindness. However, they were split on whether writing instruction was their responsibility (47.8% agreed, 52.2% disagreed) and varied in the use of writing practices across different groups of students (e.g., 74% of TVIs felt writing to inform was appropriate for students who are functionally blind, whereas only 42% and 11% felt this was appropriate for students with low vision and multiple-disabilities, respectively). The implications of this study are limited due to the small number of participants, but the results represent 40% of the total number of Nebraska TVIs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exceptionality\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"294 - 309\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2020.1850450\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exceptionality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1850450\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1850450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文介绍了一项针对内布拉斯加州视障学生教师的调查。问题涉及他们的写作教学准备、写作实践和写作教学信念。内布拉斯加州60家电视台中有24家对调查做出了回应,19家回答了所有问题。教师们在教授写作的准备工作上存在分歧(50%的教师表示接受了充分的培训),但略至中度的教师认为他们知道如何使用写作来满足学生的需求。TVI一致认为,所有写作目的(如娱乐、展示知识、日常生活活动)都适合功能性失明的学生、视力低下的学生以及多重残疾或聋哑学生。然而他们对写作教学是否是他们的责任存在分歧(47.8%的人同意,52.2%的人不同意),不同学生群体在写作实践的使用上也存在差异(例如,74%的TVI认为写作告知适合功能性失明的学生,而只有42%和11%的TVI分别认为这适合视力低下和多重残疾的学生)。由于参与者人数较少,这项研究的意义有限,但研究结果占内布拉斯加州TVI总数的40%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A survey of the writing instructional practices of Nebraska teachers of students with visual impairments
ABSTRACT This paper describes a survey of teachers of students with visual impairments (TVIs) in Nebraska. Questions addressed their preparation to teach writing, writing practices, and beliefs about writing instruction. Twenty-four of 60 TVIs in Nebraska responded to the survey, and 19 answered all questions. Teachers were split on their preparation to teach writing (50% indicated receiving adequate training), but slightly to moderately agreed that they knew how to use writing to support their students’ needs. The TVIs unanimously agreed that all writing purposes (e.g., for fun, to demonstrate knowledge, for daily living activities) are appropriate for students who are functionally blind, students who have low vision, and students with multiple disabilities or deaf-blindness. However, they were split on whether writing instruction was their responsibility (47.8% agreed, 52.2% disagreed) and varied in the use of writing practices across different groups of students (e.g., 74% of TVIs felt writing to inform was appropriate for students who are functionally blind, whereas only 42% and 11% felt this was appropriate for students with low vision and multiple-disabilities, respectively). The implications of this study are limited due to the small number of participants, but the results represent 40% of the total number of Nebraska TVIs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Exceptionality
Exceptionality EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信