数学建模中的元认知:元认知个体策略、元认知群体策略与建模能力的关系

IF 2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Katrin Vorhölter
{"title":"数学建模中的元认知:元认知个体策略、元认知群体策略与建模能力的关系","authors":"Katrin Vorhölter","doi":"10.1080/10986065.2021.2012740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There are several conceptualizations of modeling competencies, including among others on the one hand so-called sub-competencies, which are required to progress from one step of a modeling process to the next, and metacognitive individual and group strategies. However, the relationship between metacognitive strategies and modeling sub-competencies remains unclear, as does the influence of metacognitive strategies on the development of modeling competencies. The current paper presents the results of a study conducted with 170 students in grades nine and ten. This intervention study concerns the relationships between metacognitive strategies and the development of these strategies and modeling sub-competencies over the course of the study. The results illustrate that metacognitive individual strategies are highly correlated with each other, and metacognitive group strategies are highly correlated with each other, but metacognitive individual strategies are not correlated with metacognitive group strategies. Analysis of the development of metacognitive strategies and modeling sub-competencies within the intervention study reveals that not all of these developed as expected. Additionally, the factors of metacognitive strategies that were measured within the study allow for limited conclusions about the development of students’ modeling sub-competencies. These results have implications for further research.","PeriodicalId":46800,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Thinking and Learning","volume":"25 1","pages":"317 - 334"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metacognition in mathematical modeling: the connection between metacognitive individual strategies, metacognitive group strategies and modeling competencies\",\"authors\":\"Katrin Vorhölter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10986065.2021.2012740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT There are several conceptualizations of modeling competencies, including among others on the one hand so-called sub-competencies, which are required to progress from one step of a modeling process to the next, and metacognitive individual and group strategies. However, the relationship between metacognitive strategies and modeling sub-competencies remains unclear, as does the influence of metacognitive strategies on the development of modeling competencies. The current paper presents the results of a study conducted with 170 students in grades nine and ten. This intervention study concerns the relationships between metacognitive strategies and the development of these strategies and modeling sub-competencies over the course of the study. The results illustrate that metacognitive individual strategies are highly correlated with each other, and metacognitive group strategies are highly correlated with each other, but metacognitive individual strategies are not correlated with metacognitive group strategies. Analysis of the development of metacognitive strategies and modeling sub-competencies within the intervention study reveals that not all of these developed as expected. Additionally, the factors of metacognitive strategies that were measured within the study allow for limited conclusions about the development of students’ modeling sub-competencies. These results have implications for further research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematical Thinking and Learning\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"317 - 334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematical Thinking and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.2012740\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Thinking and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.2012740","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要能力建模有几个概念,一方面包括从建模过程的一个步骤到下一个步骤所需的所谓子能力,以及元认知个人和群体策略。然而,元认知策略与建模子能力之间的关系尚不清楚,元认知战略对建模能力发展的影响也不清楚。本文介绍了一项对170名九年级和十年级学生进行的研究结果。这项干预研究关注元认知策略与这些策略的发展之间的关系,并在研究过程中对子能力进行建模。结果表明,元认知个体策略与元认知群体策略之间具有高度相关性,但元认知个体战略与元认知团体策略之间不存在相关性。对干预研究中元认知策略的发展和子能力建模的分析表明,并非所有这些都如预期的那样发展。此外,在研究中测量的元认知策略因素允许对学生建模子能力的发展得出有限的结论。这些结果对进一步的研究具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Metacognition in mathematical modeling: the connection between metacognitive individual strategies, metacognitive group strategies and modeling competencies
ABSTRACT There are several conceptualizations of modeling competencies, including among others on the one hand so-called sub-competencies, which are required to progress from one step of a modeling process to the next, and metacognitive individual and group strategies. However, the relationship between metacognitive strategies and modeling sub-competencies remains unclear, as does the influence of metacognitive strategies on the development of modeling competencies. The current paper presents the results of a study conducted with 170 students in grades nine and ten. This intervention study concerns the relationships between metacognitive strategies and the development of these strategies and modeling sub-competencies over the course of the study. The results illustrate that metacognitive individual strategies are highly correlated with each other, and metacognitive group strategies are highly correlated with each other, but metacognitive individual strategies are not correlated with metacognitive group strategies. Analysis of the development of metacognitive strategies and modeling sub-competencies within the intervention study reveals that not all of these developed as expected. Additionally, the factors of metacognitive strategies that were measured within the study allow for limited conclusions about the development of students’ modeling sub-competencies. These results have implications for further research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematical Thinking and Learning
Mathematical Thinking and Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信